|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Opinions About The New 42.xx Dets
Ok people i started this thread so we can get some input on the new Driver set named 42.xx.
My opinion: I didnt see any difference compared to the 41.09s I seriously hope that this version isnt only a "bug fix" of the 41s.(better DX9 support) I didnt notice the slight performance change or in the quality department for that mater. I would also like some input on the 32.20s too cause i downloaded them but didnt get a chance to try em out yet. "this message will self destruct in 5 seconds"........4....3....2.... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok i just tried the 32.20s and found these results.
I think this set would be one of the best of the 3x.xx series. I saw performance that compared to the 41.09 in games 1 and 3 of 3dmark201 sec. But when it came to game 2 and 4 it went down to the 3x.xx performance but then most of us know that the 4x.xx drivers are better performing in Game 4 especially. I'm not sure but i think these would be good to try out on older cards gf256/gf2 etc. Again i tried them on DX9 so maybe someone could try them on a DX8.1 setup (if theres still someone that hasnt updated ) Here are some 3dmarks: 32.20: Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 142.6 FPS Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 56.7 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 138.8 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 74.8 FPS Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 138.4 FPS Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 65.5 FPS Game 4 Nature 54.1 FPS //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Here compared to the 41.09s: Note :the second score in each game is the 41.09s 3DMark Score (3D marks) 9220 9979 Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail (FPS) 142.6 143.5 .................................................. ..... Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail (FPS) 56.7 56.2 .................................................. ..... Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail (FPS) 138.8 166.7 .................................................. .......... Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail (FPS) 74.8 84.8 .................................................. ............. Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail (FPS) 138.4 138.8 .................................................. .......... Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail (FPS) 65.5 65.0 .................................................. .......... Game 4 - Nature (FPS) 54.1 68.5 .................................................. ........... As i wrote before you can see how close they performed to the 41.09s in the 2 games. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Now here is the comparison of the 32.20 to the 41.40s that i got my alltime best score. Again the second number is the the 41.40 score 3DMark Score (3D marks) 9220 10065 .................................................. ........... Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail (FPS) 142.6 148.3 .................................................. ...................... Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail (FPS) 56.7 57.7 .................................................. ........................ Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail (FPS) 138.8 168.3 .................................................. .................................. Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail (FPS) 74.8 84.9 .................................................. .................................... Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail (FPS) 138.4 142.5 .................................................. .......................................... Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail (FPS) 65.5 66.7 .................................................. .................................... Game 4 - Nature (FPS) 54.1 64.4 .................................................. ...................................... As you can see in my case my better driver has been the 41.40 that im going to switch to as soon as i finnish this post...hehehe |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just ran a new bench(a few actually) but came up with this:
Allthough i did O/C my fsb to hell and thius with a locked 2100+. check it out ![]() Microsoft Windows 2000 DirectX Version 9.0 Mobo Manufacturer Chaintech Mobo chipset Via VT8366-8233/5 AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x CPU AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1898 MHz FSB 146 MHz Memory 256 MB Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 Driver Version 6.14.01.4201 Video Memory 64 MB Program Version 3DMark2001 SE Resolution 1024x768 32bit Texture Format Compressed FSAA Disabled Z-Buffer Depth 24bit Frame Buffer Double Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L Test Results 3DMark Score "10080 3D marks " Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 146.9 FPS Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 56.6 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 167.1 FPS Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 85.2 FPS Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 141.3 FPS Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 65.8 FPS Game 4 Nature 68.8 FPS And dont forget that this is a Gf3 Ti500 64meg by MSI |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Yeah, back to the 41.09..... Personally since I bought nVidia I enjoy getting drivers.... But what is most annoying that most of the drivers don't seem to do much. And even besides that some of the drivers perform worse than previos drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 2,559
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Quote:
I've gone from the 41.09's also and apart from a slight drop in 3dmark I can see no noticable difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I frankly don't care about a 5-200 point drop in 3dmark.....as long as my games run fine and look fine. simple as that. It just when there isn't compatibility that I have to change drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 2,559
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Quote:
I agree entirely! My games don't look any different either way so I guess I'll stick with the 42.01 for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I don't notice much difference with these drivers (had the 41.09's installed), except for this game. My FPS went from about 310 to about 120! Am on a Ti4200, Win XP Home, and XP1700+ Oh well, back to the 41.09's......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Number Nine
|
Personally the 42.01 drivers work better than the 41.09, 41.04 scored my highest 3DMark 2001SE total but overall I am going to stay with the 41.09 because my games look sweet !!!!!
Serious Sam The Second Encounter with the new Beta 1.50 patch is soo smooth. I installed Clive Barker's Undying and it looks amazing for an older title. Gonna check out Max Payne next... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
42.01?
another detonators that hangs with MECHWARRIOR 4: Mercenaries.... It seems that no 4x.xx will run ok with a GeForce 4400.... why? anyway... I`m using Det 32.20 no problems in any game... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|