|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Sep 26, 2002, 01:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 283
 |
40.71 Offical Beta Det
It's available @ nVidia & I'll post my impression of it after I've run it on some benches & games.
 JAV GBA! |
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2002, 02:22 PM
|
#2 |
|
Colour Commentator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 5,619
|
Quick impression of 9x/me ones
The EXACT same 3dm2k1se score for me as the 40.41 set, DroneZ is +1 for min FPS & +4 for average as compared to the 30.82 set. (I think that's about the same as the 40.41 set)
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2002, 02:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Flash Banner Hater
|
Anyone got NVRotate working in Win9x ?
Is a non-Win9x feature? A non-Geforce 2MX feature? Or hidden deeper than I'm looking. I do NOT like the new panel layout one bit! At first impression, these do very little for old generation cards - though speed was probaly maxed out for them several versions ago, I really wanted NvRotate! |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2002, 03:02 PM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California, USA
Posts: 283
|
Dig,
40.41? You mean the same as the 40.52? This 40.71 sux on my system. Slowest driver I ever used! The GQ is good, but fps for me is awful! 20-25% lower on everything I tried it on. I re-installed the 28.32, 30.82 Omega & the 40.52 just to make sure. Yep, 40.71 is sllloooowwww. Lost 100fps in GLExcess! 1/2'd my score there.  Back to the 40.52 where I can get 30fps(min) in my games & not 22fps (40.71) at the exact same settings. The 40.71 may be good for GF4 Ti's (I read it ~is) but for me > the worst nVidia driver I ever tried. JAV GBA! I think there is some software emulation going on & my lil CPU can't do it & that is killing my fps. The 40.52 looks just as good tho'. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2002, 02:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 60
|
40.72 is now at nvidia
|
|
|
|
