|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Jun 17, 2003, 03:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1
 |
nVidia Omega drivers - quality Vs performance
Hi everybody, I´ve downloaded yesterday the new Nvidia Omega Drivers for Win2k/XP v1.4403 and when I started to install it appears to choose either quality or performance, I´ve choosed quality.
My question is if there is a diference from one to another? I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 64 MB. I still did not had time to test the drivers but they seem to improve a little the performance of the card, but I almost just play Enemy Territory. |
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2003, 11:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 2,559
|
Hi Neo and welcome to the board!
 Personally, I always choose performance option but if you're getting decent framerates then just keep things as they are! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2003, 04:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 66
|
Quality - gives you a MUCH better IQ than original det, worth a try!
Performance - looks just like the det, a bit faster maybe. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2003, 10:33 PM
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Brussels Belgium
Posts: 31
|
Omega 1.4403 Quality available?
Hello,
Are you sure that the Quality version is available? This was in the following post Nvidia Omega Drivers 1.4403 for Win2k/XP "Update: * Important: Due to a seriuos problem I had with these drivers, they will work in "Performance" mode only, even if you select "Quality" during installation, they will be updated as soon as I can fix it." I did install the Performance version and I wait for the Quality version but I think this is not yet released. BTW I do like the Performance version, it is a great job Omegadrive! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2003, 11:57 PM
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 66
|
Go for the 43.45, it has the quality option and is the better choice anyway...
|
|
|
|
