|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:09 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
Catalyst 5.10 beta?!?!?!
LINK REMOVED
Of interest is the addition of the RV515 RV520, and RV530 DEV_IDs
---PJ
Last edited by pr0digal jenius; Sep 26, 2005 at 03:15 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:12 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,223
|
according to bable fish its the demo drivers used for the R5XX cards, but this guys modded them also.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:16 PM
|
#3
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
removed the link, as leaked betas aren't in any way beneficial to the community, and seldom work without a hitch anyways.
Good find though 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:17 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,501
|
Ah the french... Crazy people!
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
Ummm, what about the 5.8 beta leak? DH had it before ATI had it on their site.
Besides, where does it say leaked betas are not allowed to be posted?
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,223
|
that wasnt a beta leak. DH and ATI work together very closely and we were given the 5.8s and 5.9s 24hrs before the general public.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:29 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
Also, why can't the link stay if there is a disclaimer? Can I post the all the PCI vendor stuff?
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:29 PM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Seems fake, anyways I wouldn't advise even bothering with that set
NGO brought the thing to my attention,
they also say its some soft of fake / hackjob
I don't think station drivers is dumb enough to post real ones
since the last time ATI severed them with a cease and desist
ordersince then they've hosted alot of "fakes"
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 26, 2005 at 03:37 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:31 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Neon_Cowboy
Seem fake, I wouldn't advise even bothering with these
|
Have you seen the INF files or file versions? No, you haven't.
You have no argument.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:45 PM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LLivingLarge
Have you seen the INF files or file versions? No, you haven't.
You have no argument.
|
You also wrong I've downloaded them, I haven't installed
them but I've unpacked them, and expaneded the driver
files manually. Looked at the INF's etc....
Discused this with other people who say the SAME
THING that it appears to be a fake / hack job or some sort
I wouldn't trust them...
Even if these file were real you shouldn't be useing them
it would be complely at your own risk and with out any
support what so ever.
They have tangled with ATI's legal department before
with posting betas. something tells me they don't want
to revisit that again... 
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 26, 2005 at 03:55 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:51 PM
|
#11
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
guys, chill out...this isn't the FWZ, no need to get hostile about anything
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 03:52 PM
|
#12
|
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 743
|
Stick to the real drivers people, you dont want that leaked nonsense. Like I said before if monthly isnt good enough speak up so I can do post CATALYST weekly ;-)
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 04:02 PM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 606
|
Hey Terry,
Daily fix would be better for some.................. 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 04:08 PM
|
#14
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
then they'd need to change the driver suite from Catalyst to Heroine 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 04:14 PM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pr0digal jenius
then they'd need to change the driver suite from Catalyst to Heroine 
|
Then in the "goodies pack" they could supply "cyber needles" 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 04:58 PM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,223
|
i dont think any one would complain about weekly releases...
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 05:04 PM
|
#17
|
|
Bouncing off the Walls
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Ford Galaxy
Posts: 725
|
I would worry about weekly releases... just seems too exessive in the way of too much time would be spent on releasing vs. fixing. Let the poor guys at ATI work and once a month is fine  atleast for me ... otherwise poor modders... could you imagin modding and testing weekly?!!?? OHH HELL NO!
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 05:05 PM
|
#18
|
|
DH Administrator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 4,552
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by another-user
i dont think any one would complain about weekly releases...
|
Only the driver engineer guys would complain haha.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 06:28 PM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by another-user
i dont think any one would complain about weekly releases...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by craig5320
Only the driver engineer guys would complain haha.
|
Along with the users them selfs, ATI support, you name it 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 06:36 PM
|
#20
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 130
|
How about just hourly
Just email em to us LOL
Second though why not just let us all work at ATi so we can get them as soon as they are done compiling 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 06:50 PM
|
#21
|
|
Frozen in Carbonite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,406
|
We don't want to over work them. They need to have a life too.  I'm happy with monthly updates myself. 
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:01 PM
|
#22
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
The only reason why Nvidia can pump out beta drivers every other day is because they actually have an OFFICIAL message board, significantly larger number of fan sites, and users anxious to test.
Edit: Substantial amount of OEM drivers from card makers and system builders is another reason.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:03 PM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 40
|
Wow Catalyst Maker maybe im dreaming but can it be that this leaked one has AVC H.264 acceleration i can play High Profile 1080p without stuttering now on a 2.4 Ghz machine and that via Mplayer it seems to accelerate the surface impressive  and that on a Radeon 9800 pro r360.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:06 PM
|
#24
|
|
-=[DHzer0point Team]=-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 174
|
Terry, I would love a weekly or BI-Weekly driver.
Im half tempted to install these (fake) 5.10 drivers as well.... ever since after driver version 5.6, atleast me useing a radeon 9800 pro 128meg video card, have had issues with Dawn of War getting stuttering so bad on any settings that it appears to stop and go. Along with that, BOS 'Bet on Soldier' also sees a issue with useing drivers past 5.6 with there game for some ATI users. The explosion in the demo useually takes me out (VPU reset to crash).
BTW- I wouldnt advise useing these drivers at all untill I give them a run through. Me having a old 9800 pro im kinda hopeing it burns up so that I have a reason to buy a R520.
PS: These drivers are build dated for the 7th. The offical drivers are 9/1 or 9/2. So in theory, these could be like 5 days newer than the officals. One thing that I found odd was that the INF file that is with this was marked for today, the 26th at 12:36pm.
This basicaly means that they modified the inf today probably to add all video cards that are not the new R500 set.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:07 PM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CATALYST maker
Stick to the real drivers people, you dont want that leaked nonsense. Like I said before if monthly isnt good enough speak up so I can do post CATALYST weekly ;-)
|
Why would you call something that in one way or another came from the company that pays you, "nonsense". Leaked or not, ATI commissions their creation, 3rd party or directly.
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:09 PM
|
#26
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
|
(If posting this is not okay, please delete it...)
Here's the PCI Vendor ID list.
"RV515 Series" = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7142
"RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7146
"RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_714E
"RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7140
"RV515 Series Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7160
"RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7162
"RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7166
"RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_716E
"RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7109
"RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710B
"RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710C
"RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7108
"RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710A
"RV520 Series Secondary" = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7120
"RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7129
"RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712A
"RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712C
"RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7128
"RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712B
"RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C6
"RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E6
"RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C2
"RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E2
"RV530" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71CE
"RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71EE
"RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C0
"RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E0
Voici quelques informations du package;
Date du driver; 06/09/2005
WHQL: non
Officiel: non
Sous:Windows 2000/Xp
Pour Chipset: Radeon Serie
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 07:15 PM
|
#27
|
|
-=[DHzer0point Team]=-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 174
| |