|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Jan 9, 2005, 06:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
 |
My AquaMark Score and My Overclock Scores!
My AquaMark Score is here:http://up1.fastuploads.info/Aquascore.JPG
Is this a good overclock speed? My system specs are as follows: Sapphire x800 Pro 256 MB (Overclocked to 535 Core and 580 Memory using ATI Tool running my gpu fans at 100% and my card is 38 degrees C and reaches 48 in regular gaming, although I have gotten to 66 degrees in ATI Tool on the little spinning cube I dont know why that cube stresses the card so much, but it does) BTW im running the unIAN driver set, works very well. 2.8 GHZ P4 80 GB Maxtor harddrive 1,024 MB Ram Audigy 2 sound card - latest drivers Please give me all your opinions Thanks!  |
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 06:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Infinity
Posts: 3,682
|
for a x800 pro id say those scores are not good. i got just under 40,000 on my 9600xt 128mg, using omegas. Try omegas drivers and see if u get a better score. Temps look pretty low....except that 66
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 06:50 PM
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
ok?.....so are the omegas going to make my game faster.....no, all they do is up my benchmark scores...
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 07:12 PM
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 08:46 PM
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 120
|
disregard that misinformed comment by battleaxe, ur score is pretty good, I have seen people with similar or better configurations than yours score much less in aquamark and other benchmarks; the unians are an excellent set and if u dont have any issues in games, u dont need to shift to the omegas as performance is almost similar a few fps here and there, also the radlinker has been giving lots of problems , so why break something that is running so well!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 08:51 PM
|
#6 | |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 09:30 PM
|
#7 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
|
battleaxe how did you get 40k on your 9600xt?? I only get 30K and the best I have seen so far is 34k or so.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9, 2005, 10:25 PM
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
he probably set all his setting to the lowest possible setting lol
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12, 2005, 01:59 PM
|
#9 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10
|
I also have an X800Pro. Clocked to 520/540 I get something like 77,890 or there abouts.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12, 2005, 05:17 PM
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
|
Dude.....you need to give your system specs, you probably have a higer processer than me....It doesnt all depend on you video card!
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12, 2005, 07:19 PM
|
#11 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10
|
Here ya go brandon
MSI K8N Neo2 Ultra AMD64 Winchester 3200+ o.c to 2475 (9x275) 1 gig (2x512) PC4200 Adata Hyperam in Dual Channel 1:1 (275mhz) Saphire X800Pro Vivo (Soft-modded to XT, 16 pipes) 520/540 74g Raptor for O/S and Games 160g Maxtor SATA for data Antec P160 w/ 3x120mm case fans 500w Fortron Blue Storm I was using the latest Omega's on Performance settings with default AquaMark settings. I will run it again now that I am at home an get a screenie. Post it when I am done. BRB |
|
|
|
|
Jan 12, 2005, 07:50 PM
|
#12 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10
|
Well, I went and ran it again. I have to admit I was a little off on what I said I had run, a bit high. I had combined the last few digits from my 3DMark2001 score with the first fews digits from AquaMark. This run, 77,111, can be viewed here: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=83910213 . It is a bit slower than my highest, 77,333, which can be viewed here: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=218128474 . Sorry for miss-stating my score, it is hell getting old and confusing things.
|
|
|
|
