|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Sep 25, 2004, 12:21 PM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The People's Republic of Cambridge
Posts: 60
 |
3dmark03 and cat. 4.9
Has anyone had any weird results from the 4.9s and 3dmark? I just built a new p4 system, with a 3.0E, 512MB of ll RAM, on an Asus p4p800-e deluxe board, and I'm getting lower scores with the 4.9 cat's now than I did with my old p4 1.8GHz Dell. I'm using the same card, a Radeon 9700 Pro, so I think the score would be much higher. It was about 4600 on the Dell, and now with my new Asus-based system, I'm only getting around 4200. I don't notice any real performance problems, except Doom 3's a bit choppy sometimes (I attribute that to my lack of RAM), so I don't really care. I was just wondering if anyone else is getting bogus results like that.
-Moskwa |
|
|
|
Sep 25, 2004, 02:35 PM
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
|
IIRC the 4.9's are not as good in 3dmark03 as the 4.8's were. also '03 is mainly geared towards your graphics card, if you try 3dmark2001se i'm sure you'll notice a much larger jump in numbers.
--edit-- welcome to DH  |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2004, 07:04 PM
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 68
|
I got only slightly lower in 3dMark03 going from 4.8 to 4.9
4.8 = 2446 avg Omega's based on 4.8 = 2440 4.9 = 2442 avg BUT, doing the CPU test in 3dMark03, I got the following 4.8 = 404 avg omega's based on 4.8 = 401 avg 4.9 = 465-468 avg Thats a 15% increase. Weird! |
|
|
|
