|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jul 3, 2003, 02:45 AM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 16
|
3.5 the beginning of the end for ati.
Anyone see the huge quality loss with 3.5s. Everyone’s all yippidy doo over a 100point increase in 3d2k3, but u know where that came from. if they took out all optimizations yet u have a higher score, where u think the performance comes from. ati's turning into nvidia. the stupid 3dmark wars are ruining ati’s rep, and advantage over nvidia (quailty). Quality’s why iv stuck with ati all these years.
Have u ever compared the quality of a original radeon 32mb with aa and af on with old drivers like 2.5 the quality difference is amazing 10x better. With every driver release it seems they found a couple new ways to lower quality for performance. who cares about a couple stupid meaningless 3dmark points. i bought my 9700pro for its quality, i paid that extra for its aa/af performance. You’ve all become so obsessed with your 3dmark score that you’ll download every driver hack and tweak lowering ur quality for that extra point, now atis getting in the action. We are at the point now that’s its just a blurry jagged mess.
Textures are all blurry, lost its vibrant colors ( washed out like nvidia) and lost its sharp and crispness. i also found objects render at closer distances now. ex. in battlefield when ur flying u can see hills render, morph gain shape.
People just stop encouraging them by saying how great these new drivers are cuz u gained ur stupid little 5 points in 3dmark. 3dmark has become the most bias performance displayer out there. Please ati stick to ur roots that’s what’s kept u alive all this time? U guys have never had the performance lead in 3d gaming but people kept buying. Cuz ur a quality product in every since of the word. I’v been an ati customer since ati rage. Iv owned gf 2 and 3 and brought them both back cuz it was like night and day when it came to quality, and smoothness. ATIs 30fps felt like nvidias 50.
stop letting these stupid 3dmark wars ruin your cards!
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 03:04 AM
|
#2
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
And you are?
A) out of your mind
B) a computer noob
C) a Troll ( most likely)

|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 03:07 AM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
Originally posted by HawK
And you are?
A) out of your mind
B) a computer noob
C) a Troll ( most likely)
|
Hawk you forgot...
D) All of the above
I think its "D"

|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 04:19 AM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
|
well amsties, first off welcome to driverheaven
but I too would have to STRONGLY disagree with your post. I mean IQ has never been better on my r9700 pro! I don't even bench 2k1 or 2k3 anymore just play games so I couldn't tell you how newer drivers affect my bench scores but I can tell you how they improve my game IQ.
maybe you've gotten some conflicts there on your pc or something?? maybe try drivercleaner and a clean driver install because it simply is not as you posted above....
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 05:33 AM
|
#5
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
I did notice a drop in quality from the 3.4's to the 3.5's. Really. Actually, I went back to the 3.4's because I think they look better. I could tell a huge difference in RTCW ET- with everything maxed in game and 4xAA and 16xAF w/quality sliders set to highest in driver.
The IQ DID go down, just a little- I could tell. I don't even bench my cards anymore- Not for top score, just for a reference from one driver / system change to the next. I might run driver cleaner again and reinstall the 3.5's to see if it was a glitch- but I did it twice already. I think the 3.4's look a tad bit better.
To go as far as the original post?- I dunno- I think IQ is still a main concern with ATI- I think the speed gains for AA that were had with the new 3.5 cat's came from somewhere though- and it's always an IQ vs. speed ratio, no matter how you slice it. I understand the concern, but let's see what happens with the next driver before we crucify ATI.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 05:57 AM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
|
or just use omegas 
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 06:43 AM
|
#7
|
|
Still watching...
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orihuela (Spain)
Posts: 1,557
|
Omegas rulez, hope the new release come soon...
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 07:56 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
Quote:
Originally posted by shuki
or just use omegas
|
Or a better monitor
So many times i see great rig's with almost anything you could ever wish for..
on a old 14/15" thing (not even worth to call it a monitor)
reminds me of those who bought a very expensive Stereosytem
and some cheap loudspeakers at *fill in cheap store*
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 08:00 AM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17
|
I will not feed the trolls
I will not feed the trolls
I will not feed the trolls
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 08:23 AM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
really ? i gained 400 2001se 3dmarks and 300 2003 3dmarks!!!
u on crack?
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 08:37 AM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 79
|
That's probably the only post he'll ever make. I agree that the CAT 3.5s do degrade in IQ with regards to a few games, etc. Added to the fact that they are just really buggy (DDC issue, NWNs issues, OpenGL issues, etc, etc, etc). Maybe that's why it's taking Omega so long to get out a release based on the 3.5s.  (Heh, the topic title is funny...beginning of the end....lol, some people)
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 09:00 AM
|
#12
|
|
Colour Commentator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 5,619
|
Don't be too quick to condemn the man for questioning ATi, you never know what you may find out.... 
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 09:08 AM
|
#13
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 129
|
Maybe he picked the wrong topic name but as you can see more than one person in one way or another agrees with him as far as quality goes. His first post and what do you do you jump his butt right away, good thing nothing he posted was inflammatory or I'd really hate to see what you do to him, it was just his opinion and one that is shared by a couple of others. You hawk and vengeance ought to be ashamed of yourselfs, way to welcome the new guy. I believe the Answer D fits both of you for your oh so nice welcome. And I wouldn't blame him if it was his last post, what do you expect?
nice article digitalwanderer...
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 09:09 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4
|
He's ABSOLUTLY right!
Hi you Gaming Folks!
I'm using 3D Studio Max and I can just say:
amsties IS right! And no troll, 'couse I'm no troll, too.
But I'm having exactly the same Problem.
I changed my grafix card from the 8500 to the 9700 Pro.
Yes, there is a performance boost! Yes, the 9700 Pro is a great gaming card!
BUT...
With the 8500 Smoothvision realy worked! With the 9700 Pro is doesn't.
With the 8500 the wireframes within 3D Max realy looked like a higher screen resolution. With the 9700 Pro (btw. the SAME driver Version 3.2) it changes to a blurry NVidia something, I can't work with anymore.
This forced me to turn off the Smoothvision.
 ==> STOPP kinking him and show US a solution!
btw. it's NOT the omega driver, becouse it's the ATI driver code that's still not working as proposed.
Malfkas
(sorry for the spelling)
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 11:14 AM
|
#15
|
|
Avril Fan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in colombia, okok, bogotá city :p
Posts: 1,252
|
I dont think 3.5 CAT will be the start of the end for ATI, I mean, we have seen bad drivers for ATI, really BAD ones
besides, that it doesnt work perfectly for u doesnt mean it wont work on others PC
edit: another think yeah the quality did went backwards since 3.0 cats are out, but hey Its faster now, so no complain ;p
hope u can solve ur problems
ATI RULEZ !!!
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 11:36 AM
|
#16
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
Re: 3.5 the beginning of the end for ati.
Quote:
Originally posted by amsties
Anyone see the huge quality loss with 3.5s. Everyone’s all yippidy doo over a 100point increase in 3d2k3, but u know where that came from. if they took out all optimizations yet u have a higher score, where u think the performance comes from. ati's turning into nvidia. the stupid 3dmark wars are ruining ati’s rep, and advantage over nvidia (quailty). Quality’s why iv stuck with ati all these years.
Have u ever compared the quality of a original radeon 32mb with aa and af on with old drivers like 2.5 the quality difference is amazing 10x better. With every driver release it seems they found a couple new ways to lower quality for performance. who cares about a couple stupid meaningless 3dmark points. i bought my 9700pro for its quality, i paid that extra for its aa/af performance. You’ve all become so obsessed with your 3dmark score that you’ll download every driver hack and tweak lowering ur quality for that extra point, now atis getting in the action. We are at the point now that’s its just a blurry jagged mess.
Textures are all blurry, lost its vibrant colors ( washed out like nvidia) and lost its sharp and crispness. i also found objects render at closer distances now. ex. in battlefield when ur flying u can see hills render, morph gain shape.
People just stop encouraging them by saying how great these new drivers are cuz u gained ur stupid little 5 points in 3dmark. 3dmark has become the most bias performance displayer out there. Please ati stick to ur roots that’s what’s kept u alive all this time? U guys have never had the performance lead in 3d gaming but people kept buying. Cuz ur a quality product in every since of the word. I’v been an ati customer since ati rage. Iv owned gf 2 and 3 and brought them both back cuz it was like night and day when it came to quality, and smoothness. ATIs 30fps felt like nvidias 50.
stop letting these stupid 3dmark wars ruin your cards!
|
I pretty much agree with you. 3dMark is synthetic. People get WAY too hyped over this. Although I don't believe that ATi is turning into nVidia.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 11:53 AM
|
#17
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: C-Towne, GA
Posts: 11
|
if you gimps(read:shorter, stumpier trolls with no life who have timers programmed in C# set for when the driver ihits the net) would stop bitching about FPS ATI could focus on quality. 24 FPS is all your eyes need to percieve "fluid" motion...so shut the fuck up about "oh now, quake dropped from 185 to 170, ATI SUCKS!"
Find drivers with the best quality....play your damned games and shut up.
Maybe ATI will be nice and make your smoothvision work, or maybe they'll realize your all assholes and tell you to sit on yer thumb and lean. DAMN.
I hate you all, and yes, this will be my last post here, thank god. you are all a bunch of whiny assholes who bitch about eveyrthing. you want better drivers....write them. you want them to stop cheating on the benchmarks..STOP RELYING ON BENCHMARKS
Ok...I'm out..forever...hav fun...and I hope all of you bunr in hell along with those video cards you cook trying to push a few more pixels
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 11:58 AM
|
#18
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
Hey, kw4ntum.................Um, check out the name of this website. It's primary topic IS drivers. Yes, I agree, some people do whine a lot, but what do you expect when that is this forum's primary discussion.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 12:15 PM
|
#19
|
|
F*&k The Police
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, US
Posts: 2,103
|
I dont like these catalyst3.5's - I'm gonna go back to my trustworthy Omega 2.4.43 today, since they run much better with the 9500 > 9700 hack.
But then again I CANT WAIT TILL OMEGA COMES OUT WITH HIS SET OF 3.5'S
-tek 
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:05 PM
|
#20
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kw4ntuM
if you gimps(read:shorter, stumpier trolls with no life ..... would stop bitching about FPS ATI could focus on quality. 24 FPS is all your eyes need to percieve "fluid" motion...so shut the fuck up about "oh now, quake dropped from 185 to 170, ATI SUCKS!"
....play your damned games and shut up.
or maybe they'll realize your all assholes and tell you to sit on yer thumb and lean. DAMN.
I hate you all, and yes, this will be my last post here, thank god. you are all a bunch of whiny assholes who bitch about eveyrthing. STOP RELYING ON BENCHMARKS
Ok...I'm out..forever.....and I hope all of you bunr in hell along with those video cards you cook trying to push a few more pixels
|
WTF is wrong with people- 
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:07 PM
|
#21
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
Gotta love ignorance.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:09 PM
|
#22
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 721
|
This Kunttum, Quantum, guy is a real prize.  Hey, man, just cause you're short, bald, and are a 35 year old virgin, don't take out your pent-up
rage on people in a forum man. Didn't your mother raise you better than that? 
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:22 PM
|
#23
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
HEY, BMG... Cut it with the flaming.... This is not the flame warzone.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:30 PM
|
#24
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
|
any further off topic posts or flaming here will result in thread closure. Gentlemen, please behave out here. If not, please take it to the flame warzone. Now go on, don't spoil the thread any further guys.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:35 PM
|
#25
|
|
Rolling the Hard Six
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lock Haven, PA
Posts: 765
|
Quote:
if you gimps(read:shorter, stumpier trolls with no life ..... would stop bitching about FPS ATI could focus on quality. 24 FPS is all your eyes need to percieve "fluid" motion...so shut the fuck up about "oh now, quake dropped from 185 to 170, ATI SUCKS!"
....play your damned games and shut up.
or maybe they'll realize your all assholes and tell you to sit on yer thumb and lean. DAMN.
I hate you all, and yes, this will be my last post here, thank god. you are all a bunch of whiny assholes who bitch about eveyrthing. STOP RELYING ON BENCHMARKS
Ok...I'm out..forever.....and I hope all of you bunr in hell along with those video cards you cook trying to push a few more pixels
|
Just a few things to point out here, I forget what your name was. You talk about how ATI should stop listening to people and told those people to shove it. If they were to do that they'd alienate the only reason they're a company, consumers. Without us, they don't have a company. Same thing with Nvidia, if they don't listen to what we have to say we'll go to another, albeit worse company for our hardware. So I do believe you are the one who should be sticking your thumb where the sun doesn't shine. And while you're at it, you might want to consider putting your foot in your mouth and looking at reason before you post. And who cares if you leave? You've had what, seven posts ever? I know I haven't had many more but the point is that Zardon doesn't need you here, he's got 33,000 other people here posting non-gay things. Now, about us "bunr"ing our video cards. Look at yourself ass, in your signature it says you're overclocking your card. That's like making fun of a mentally handicapped person and then being late for your remedial learning class. Grow up people.
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2003, 01:40 PM
|
#26
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
|
can thank studbagel9 for lack of self control for this lock...
|
|
|
|
|
|