[Warpy]

Pls Rate SP2 over SP1.

[Judas]

my gaud, the improvements over SP1 and over the Orginal is outstanding.

However, i must stress that the only way in my opinion to experience the way the Service Packs were designed, is to install a fresh SLIPSTREAMED version, installing a service pack AFTER finishing an installation of windows tends to give everyone problems, or cause unwanted issues REGUARDLESS of how you do it or what you do it on.

[Zelig]

What Judas said.

However, I mostly disabled all the new stuff that came with SP2, so from memory, I honestly can't recall anything different, other than internal security stuff, (and the boot screen ) that's different now that I have SP2.

[Dom]

SP2, quite obviously.

[Sargentwhitey]

I haven't upgraded yet, mainly because the first 7 times I tried it, it worked horribly. But now that I have a new XP Pro install I should probably try it again.

[The_Neon_Cowboy]

Why do people keep asking this? ROFL

It's like asking should i update my 1/9/1998 drivers to 2/1/2005 ones LOL

a close to 450-500mb update full version, unpacked, includeing massive improvents and even some long horn code.... many say it the way xp should have been realeased in the 1st place

[CDsDontBurn]

lol.....the only reason why i chose sp2 was because all the updates that you need to d/l if you only have sp1 are already in sp2 . All the other services that sp2 comes with, i disable just like i did w/sp1 .

[md5]

SP2, of course

As Neon said, it's how XP should have been released in the first place

[franguinho]

hah nobody picked sp1 so far...

[NuTz]

another vote for sp2 here

[pr0digal jenius]

sp2 fer shizzle!

[>GSXR<mrbusa]

this is a no brainer,SP2 all the way.i never had one problem with any rcs or final releases.i could never figure out what all the fuss was.later