|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Oct 25, 2007, 05:59 AM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
Is Anyone Still Using Windows 9x?
If so, which specific version?
I'm just curious. 
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 02:31 PM
|
#2
|
|
Flash Banner Hater
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,962
|
Got a 98SE box I keep threatening to revive if I can find space.
Actually, 98SE is kind of the breakpoint, the newest version with really good "old" compatibility (most "95" stuff should run), and still just about in the support range of newer programs, though slowly slipping away.
Thing is, Windows ME is no more forward compatible, and significantly worse in backward.
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 02:56 PM
|
#3
|
|
Mars
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,927
|
Nope.
I've got a vmware image of 98se that I can boot up for compatibility purposes, but I use it very rarely anymore.
I'd never use 9x as a main OS on any PC.
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 03:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,020
|
i haven't run win9x in such a long time, i've even forgotten the commands for it! and the only thing i use cmd for in winXP is for ipconfig settings, lol.
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 04:14 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Real captial of Canada: Toronto
Posts: 4,742
|
Don't use it myself, but I have clients that do. None on new hardware, btw (almost impossible to run 98SE on new Intel hardware... dunno about AMD though). In fact, I just got through repairing one. Stupid client tried installing a USB device that f'd everything to hell.
I tell you... compare 98SE to anything that has come after it, and you just have to sit back and wonder where Microsoft f'd up. 98SE loads fast, runs fast, launches apps fast, and shuts down fast on minimal hardware. Vista can't even do this on a system 3 - 4 generations newer than this computer I just got through working on unless you run on a machine that's setup for RAID 0 on 10-15k drives, has 4GB of stupidly fast DDR2, and is running a quad core or better CPU.
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 04:40 PM
|
#6
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,020
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipstaff
Don't use it myself, but I have clients that do. None on new hardware, btw (almost impossible to run 98SE on new Intel hardware... dunno about AMD though). In fact, I just got through repairing one. Stupid client tried installing a USB device that f'd everything to hell.
I tell you... compare 98SE to anything that has come after it, and you just have to sit back and wonder where Microsoft f'd up. 98SE loads fast, runs fast, launches apps fast, and shuts down fast on minimal hardware. Vista can't even do this on a system 3 - 4 generations newer than this computer I just got through working on unless you run on a machine that's setup for RAID 0 on 10-15k drives, has 4GB of stupidly fast DDR2, and is running a quad core or better CPU.
|
now, imagine win98se on such a machine 
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 04:59 PM
|
#7
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
not sure...
but on the vista machines i've been setting up..
i hit the power button (for it to auto shutdown)..... and walk away.. before i make it usually to the door, it's already off...
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2007, 08:14 PM
|
#8
|
|
Mars
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipstaff
I tell you... compare 98SE to anything that has come after it, and you just have to sit back and wonder where Microsoft f'd up. 98SE loads fast, runs fast, launches apps fast, and shuts down fast on minimal hardware.
|
Yeah, but only on a fresh boot, and a fresh install.
Personally, any marginal hardware isn't going to be gaming anyway, so it's getting some variation of linux, I can't stand dealing with 9x.
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 06:37 AM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,396
|
I do not use 9x, but two of my "clients" do. Win98SE on one machine and Win95 on the another. I did a reinstall of the 95 machine a few days ago because of a HDD problem - I have never seen so much dust before...
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 09:22 AM
|
#10
|
|
DH's Asteroids' Dominator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK and Hellas, mostly
Posts: 4,921
|
I would like to install windows 98se but I can't since I have Windows XP and trialware of Vistal already installed.
VirtualPC can help but not for applications that require more than 4MBs of poor graphics card.
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 10:58 AM
|
#11
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
actually the other day, someone brought me in a computer with windows 3.11
and nearly a year ago... i was brought in a computer with basically a beautified verison of DOS
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 12:48 PM
|
#12
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,020
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
actually the other day, someone brought me in a computer with windows 3.11
and nearly a year ago... i was brought in a computer with basically a beautified verison of DOS
|
isn't that what windows 3.11 is? a glorified DOS 
Last edited by CDsDontBurn; Oct 26, 2007 at 01:20 PM.
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 02:00 PM
|
#13
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
not sure.. but windows 98 initiall had active desktop that would litterly kill the system emediately....
|
|
|
Oct 26, 2007, 02:47 PM
|
#14
|
|
DH's Asteroids' Dominator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK and Hellas, mostly
Posts: 4,921
|
Oh man, I remember after installing windows and you would get the active desktop and with the greek version you would get some greek sites but none of them would work. Great move...
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 12:28 AM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
|
I use win98 but in vmware. Not anymore as a main OS
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 01:23 AM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
actually the other day, someone brought me in a computer with windows 3.11
and nearly a year ago... i was brought in a computer with basically a beautified verison of DOS
|
Remember the 'joy' of swapping Floppy Disks during the installation of 3.1 and 3.11? 
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 01:35 AM
|
#17
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
YES
bloody hell i hated the floppy disks with windows 3.11 and worse yet was a floppy install of 95....
It just as horrible as an initial install of the 6 floppies for xp pro when there was no bootable cdrom available.
And worse case yet, is getting to the point of nearly completion, and one of the floppies apparently died.... my gaud that really tears you up.. specially if the floppy creator doesn't let you choose a specific floppy...
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 01:49 AM
|
#18
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
YES
bloody hell i hated the floppy disks with windows 3.11 and worse yet was a floppy install of 95....
It just as horrible as an initial install of the 6 floppies for xp pro when there was no bootable cdrom available.
And worse case yet, is getting to the point of nearly completion, and one of the floppies apparently died.... my gaud that really tears you up.. specially if the floppy creator doesn't let you choose a specific floppy...
|
Man, I can't remember how many times I had to rap a 'stuck' floppy disk on the edge of the desk to get it to work again. And, then you had to hope against hope that it WOULD work after that abuse.
I'm trying to remember the largest number of floppies I ever had to use to install a program. I think it was something like 11 disks but, that might be a low estimate. I still have a HUGE collection stored away in the closet somewhere.
It was this 'joy of the floppy disk' that prompted me to lay out $400 Smackaroos for my very first PC CD ROM drive. LOL!
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 01:51 AM
|
#19
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
Thing is, i install a copy of 3.11 for the first time back in 2003-2004......
I've tried abusing dead floppy disks (what do you have to lose lol)... and i've never got one to start "working" again ...ever... and i've gone through countless floppies. Used a pile of bios updating....
alas, i'm really happy i got his 8gb OCZ Rally2 Flash drive.... flipping suckers fast as hell.
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 01:55 AM
|
#20
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
Thing is, i install a copy of 3.11 for the first time back in 2003-2004......
I've tried abusing dead floppy disks (what do you have to lose lol)... and i've never got one to start "working" again ...ever... and i've gone through countless floppies. Used a pile of bios updating....
alas, i'm really happy i got his 8gb OCZ Rally2 Flash drive.... flipping suckers fast as hell.
|
Are you THAT far behind the times in Canada?  (j/k)
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 02:19 AM
|
#21
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,664
|
no
someone needed a computer setup with it so they could run a very old program..... which only worked under 3.11 and was in no way manageable under 95 or nt.....
|
|
|
Nov 21, 2007, 05:28 AM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,980
|
Win 98 may still popular in some group of people who have less chances of getting a better computer system with a more capable hardware.
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2007, 01:15 AM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: t0r0nt0
Posts: 574
|
my 2k (see sig) was a 98 untill july2006 (when the registry/os completely failed & refused to boot for no reason at all)
now that was a load of power for a 98
i got dosbox installed cuz of some old games.. & one of my fav demoscene things does not run on any NT (& runs like crap in dosbox)
i should probably look into vmware or msvpc
|
|
|
May 13, 2008, 10:25 PM
|
#24
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio U.S.A.
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyre Straits
Man, I can't remember how many times I had to rap a 'stuck' floppy disk on the edge of the desk to get it to work again. And, then you had to hope against hope that it WOULD work after that abuse.
I'm trying to remember the largest number of floppies I ever had to use to install a program. I think it was something like 11 disks but, that might be a low estimate. I still have a HUGE collection stored away in the closet somewhere.
It was this 'joy of the floppy disk' that prompted me to lay out $400 Smackaroos for my very first PC CD ROM drive. LOL!
|
Microsoft Office for 3.11 was like 26 disks or some sort.... nightmareish
Back in the day I used to have to install DOS, then 3.1, then 3.11 upgrade, configure it then install office..... I had disks everywhere.
Back to topic... I have an old Gateway PIII 700 that I have 98se on... just to have it. For what it is, she runs fine. Leftover parts deserves a leftover OS. Hey I can still record a few tracks on it in the basement.
|
|
|
|