|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Dec 12, 2007, 08:56 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
DH SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 15,735
|
Windows Vista SP1 RC1 Public
Please discuss the Vista SP1 public release here.
|
|
|
Dec 12, 2007, 09:20 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Hezbollah supporter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gefle, Sweden
Posts: 3,059
|
I'll dodge this since all important fixes that are in SP1 should already be out as individual updates, but it would still be interesting to hear from anyone with first hand experience. Go little guinea pigs, go!

|
|
|
Dec 12, 2007, 09:43 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 330
|
Isnt there something about having to completely uninstall this once the final SP1 is released I seem to remember reading?
Has anyone tried this yet?
I've patched as the weeks go by automatically bit not sure about a non final service pack...
__________________
AMD64 X2 4800+ / ATI X1950XTX / Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe
Corsair TWINX2048-3200C2 / Zalman 9550 / PCP&C 510 SLI
3 x Maxtor DM10 250GB SATA NCQ / NEC 2500A DVDR
|
|
|
Dec 12, 2007, 10:18 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
DH SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 15,735
|
Yes, you will need to uninstall the RC before the final release.
|
|
|
Dec 12, 2007, 10:19 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 330
|
I assume you mean RC 
|
|
|
Dec 12, 2007, 11:32 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,691
|
I think I'll sit this one out. Can't believe they put it in windows update too.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaltC
Ignorance isn't just bliss, it's also a Mac. (OK, forgive me...  )
|
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 12:46 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
i heard SP1 RC is now supporting 4GB RAM in 32-bit (or x86-based) version of Vista just like Windows Server 2008 RC1 32-bit Standard Edition.
i need to make a correction to that.
Physical memory available to Windows is still at 3.5 GB max, but the amount of installed memory in Computer Properties dialog box is 4.00 GB
Last edited by PangingJr; Dec 13, 2007 at 12:59 AM.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 01:27 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 6,009
|
wished that they would fix it so that vid memory is adressed seperately from sytem mem. would make getting 4 gigs worthwhile then.
though i wonder if vista still has some of the little hickups xp has with 4 gig installed...
__________________
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 02:18 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
clean install of Vista on 4GB RAM computer never be a problem to me.
and on my own experience and my own computers with 4 GB RAM, as far as i can see, there is no problem at all with using 4 GB under Vista 32-bit (there should not be problem with the 64-bit editions of Vista). however, i personally never use a vid card with its own memory of more than 256 MB yet, so i'm not sure if there will be any problem with system that has 512 MB and 1 GB of vid memory, well, i just don't think there will be a problem with that.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 02:24 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 22,798
|
the only issues i've come across with 32bit OS + more then 3gb of ram is the lack of being able to actually address that extra ram typically due to the more recent 256mb minimum on video cards and the fact that 1gb cards are coming into play now....
Now in some circumstances... depending on the boards in use.. and the chipset as well, i've seen some machines litterly just fall appart under windows XP Pro SP2, system becomes unresponcive sometimes, or weird errors start popping up... List goes on.
If you use the PAE extension, the amount of overhead to address the extra space is pretty horrific. Typically a BAD idea if your doing some pretty insanely memory bandwidth related tasks, games included.... it's not a wise idea.... from my experience though.
What i don't get is why anyone needs Vista 32bit... or 32bit aside from older machines that don't have 64bit capabilities.
A New Machine built today, SHOULDN'T have vista 32bit installed onto it IMO, i haven't installed a single 32bit verison of windows since vista launched aside from my own testing and the machines incapable of 64bit.
__________________
Quote:
On the matter of communism, and it's front organizations should not obscure the issues. ~Adolf Hitler
Our enemy is a radical network of terrorist, and every government that supports them. ~George W. Bush An evil excists that threatens every man, woman, and child, of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland. ~George W. Bush & Adolf Hitler
Look in the mirror occasionally, unless you reflect on what has occured in the past, scale those historical moments and forgotten moments to todays current situations, you are bound, in every inconceiveable and unwanted way, to repeat that which you may have swore to never do, and never support. We must awaken, and we must do so now and in mass. ~*pm me for whom*
|
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 02:59 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
well, i think, most of today computer system are x86-64 and capable of using 64-bit editions of Windows. but most of new computers with 1-2GB are built and sold today's will still be having Windows x86-based OS.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 04:38 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
4870X2 Anyone??
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,058
|
Using SP1 RC1..... alot of noticeable "day to day" improvements in terms of responsiveness and whatnot. Gaming, nothing really out of the ordinary.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 05:09 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,076
|
As I'm not having any particularly bothersome problems, I think I'll skip this 'evaluation' copy and wait it out. I do keep things updated via the Update site anyway.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 05:44 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
just finished 3 clean install of Vista's, each system require about 15-20 minutes for the installation of Windows and a reactivation (by phone call),
then each system has SP1 RC installed, the installation of the SP took some time to finish, then all 3 Vista copies requires a internet activation (again).
i've been using SP1 beta for quite abit of time and i found nothing broken, so i feel comfortable to use this RC build.
|
|
|
Dec 13, 2007, 07:36 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,076
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PangingJr
just finished 3 clean install of Vista's, each system require about 15-20 minutes for the installation of Windows and a reactivation (by phone call),
then each system has SP1 RC installed, the installation of the SP took some time to finish, then all 3 Vista copies requires a internet activation (again).
i've been using SP1 beta for quite abit of time and i found nothing broken, so i feel comfortable to use this RC build.
|
So, do you find there to be any real pressing reason/s to install this now?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
|
| |