• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Software / Tools > Windows Vista Forum

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Jul 24, 2007, 11:20 AM   #1
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 427
josh2thad is on a distinguished road

What does Windows Vista Rate you???

josh2thad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 03:22 PM   #2
Mars
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,925
Zelig will become famous soon enoughZelig will become famous soon enough
System Specs



My primary drive was about 80% full, and heavily fragmented when this was done. I'm currently clearing out the drive of data, will retry when it's done, I'm curious if it will be enough to make any difference to the score.
Zelig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 03:59 PM   #3
Chilling... :)
 
Erroneus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 12,532
Erroneus will become famous soon enoughErroneus will become famous soon enough
System Specs

5,7 at CPU, 5,9 (highest) at the rest.
Erroneus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2007, 04:09 PM   #4
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 883
Brutality will become famous soon enough

3.9
Brutality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 01:22 AM   #5
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 427
josh2thad is on a distinguished road

what brand, speed and timings of ram are you guys that are getting 5.9's getting

Im usiung ADATA DDR 800 4-4-4-14 @ 890MHz
josh2thad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 03:36 AM   #6
Chilling... :)
 
Erroneus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 12,532
Erroneus will become famous soon enoughErroneus will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Kingston 2 GB PC5300 (666) @ 6600 (825) , low timing though, these rams are really meant for OC'ing, but does a fine job anyway.

Timings: 5-7-7-20

Weird though you are getting lower score on your ram, you are running faster speeds and on better latency then me and with the same 965p chipset, maybe my DS4 rev 3.3 is better at mem speeds then yours what? S3? DS3?
Erroneus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 03:51 AM   #7
Epic Phail at Lief
 
Mousey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,411
Mousey has a spectacular aura aboutMousey has a spectacular aura about
System Specs

i got 4.1 but i don't use vista anymore, i just got so pissed at it's incredible memory usage (500mb + when it's idle you know) and when you've got 1gb it's not enough.
i'm gonna stick with XP until vista is completely sorted, mebbe another year or 2 yet
Mousey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 05:42 AM   #8
Mars
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,925
Zelig will become famous soon enoughZelig will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh2thad View Post
what brand, speed and timings of ram are you guys that are getting 5.9's getting

Im usiung ADATA DDR 800 4-4-4-14 @ 890MHz
Heh, I'm using OCZ DDR1 PC3200 3-3-2-8-2T @ 254 (509) MHz.
Zelig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2007, 08:14 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,964
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

Gaming graphics: 5





Last edited by PangingJr; Jul 26, 2007 at 12:41 PM.
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2007, 02:25 PM   #10
Xtreme
 
Lowfat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 3,472
Lowfat will become famous soon enough

5.6 because of my HDD, 320GB Seagate 7200.10. Everything else is 5.9.
Lowfat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2007, 03:24 PM   #11
DH Team Leader
 
temeteus82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Posts: 5,554
temeteus82 is a name known to alltemeteus82 is a name known to alltemeteus82 is a name known to alltemeteus82 is a name known to alltemeteus82 is a name known to alltemeteus82 is a name known to all
System Specs

4.2 in total
temeteus82 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2, 2007, 03:25 PM   #12
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,284
Al_Vampyre will become famous soon enough
System Specs

5.0 for me...
Al_Vampyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2007, 12:13 AM   #13
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 27
jdc0589 is on a distinguished road

5.7 for me... but I think something may be fishy as the processor is my weak link....which is a 3.0Ghz E6850 Core 2 Duo, no overclocking. everything else is 5.9
jdc0589 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2007, 01:56 AM   #14
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 427
josh2thad is on a distinguished road

hmm my Cpu is a 5.8 @ 3.3Ghz
josh2thad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2007, 02:06 AM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,964
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

i think anything above 5 indicates your system processor is good enough.
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2007, 07:00 PM   #16
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 27
jdc0589 is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh2thad View Post
hmm my Cpu is a 5.8 @ 3.3Ghz
I overclocked mine to 3.2 which yielded the same 5.7
Maybe the extra .1ghz is the difference.
jdc0589 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 01:35 AM   #17
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Just Learnin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,266
Just Learnin' will become famous soon enoughJust Learnin' will become famous soon enough
System Specs

5.8

Just Learnin' is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:41 AM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,964
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Learnin' View Post
5.8
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2007, 07:26 AM   #19
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
perryleros is on a distinguished road

Strange Things can happen :D

Well i have :
CPU: Intel E6850
Motherboard: Asus P5K Deluxe WiFi/AP
RAM: 2x1gb 4-4-4-12 Cellshock
VGA: XFX GeForce 8800GTS 320mb
HDD: WD Raptor 36Gb for primary and 2 x 300Gb WD Caviars for storage

I got all 5.9 except cpu which was 5.6 when i installed vista.
I overclocked cpu to 3.6Ghz and ran test again. I got 5.8 on CPU and same on the rest.
The strange thing is that i lowered CPU to stock speed and ran test again.. I now get 5.8 CPU at stock speed... WTF? i ran the test 4-5 times, shut down pc , restarted etc.. same results.
Here are some pics:

Stock speed after installing windows for 1st time:
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/9...tanewpcfh6.jpg

Overclocked to 3.6Ghz:
http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/1...36vistauq1.jpg

After returning to stock speed:
http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/6855/wtfqr1.jpg


Can someone give me a reasonable explanation?

PS. I underclocked cpu to 2ghz and tried again.. stil 5.8 it must have stuck there for good lol

Last edited by perryleros; Aug 27, 2007 at 08:10 AM.
perryleros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2007, 08:02 AM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,964
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

Quote:
Originally Posted by perryleros View Post

I overclocked cpu to 3.6Ghz and ran test again. I got 5.8 on CPU and same on the rest.
The strange thing is that i lowered CPU to stock speed and ran test again.. I now get 5.8 CPU at stock speed... WTF? i ran the test 4-5 times, shut down pc , restarted etc.. same results.
the same thing happen to everyone who i know and who did that.

the test tool is still not perfect (it's just a bit better than the BETA's time) at this time, and it's not smart enough to adjust your CPU score downward.
or it's smart enough to know you are playing with the CPU score using the same CPU but you just overclocked it more. but, fact is, i really don't know, lol.

Last edited by PangingJr; Aug 27, 2007 at 08:17 AM.
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2007, 02:11 PM   #21
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 427
josh2thad is on a distinguished road

My Cpu is a 5.8 When clocked @ either 3.2 ( i use daily) or when its clock to 3.4 when i benchmarked it.
josh2thad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2007, 02:56 PM   #22
Burned
 
Zardon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,643
Zardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his statusZardon is godlike in his status

5.9
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2007, 03:23 PM   #23
DH News MOD
 
MIG-31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 32,483
MIG-31 is just super!MIG-31 is just super!MIG-31 is just super!MIG-31 is just super!MIG-31 is just super!MIG-31 is just super!
System Specs

Strange one for me to be honest.

First install on my previous pc was 4.1

Second install on my new pc (listed toward the left) was 5.4.Since then my windows vista install fuXed up,and was forced to reinstall.(windows Vista Home Premium Upgrade).I need to install xp before vista will accept my cd key.

After a second install i am getting a score of 5.3.. After a full defrag of the main HDD my score has upped to 5.4.
MIG-31 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2007, 03:18 AM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,964
PangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura aboutPangingJr has a spectacular aura about

Quote:
Originally Posted by perryleros View Post
PS. I underclocked cpu to 2ghz and tried again.. stil 5.8 it must have stuck there for good lol
yep, i guess so.
PangingJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2007, 06:19 PM   #25
At Your Service...
 
swimtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,657
swimtech is a jewel in the roughswimtech is a jewel in the roughswimtech is a jewel in the roughswimtech is a jewel in the rough
System Specs

1.7, PC100 SDRam you know...

The 9600XT video card rates 3.0 and 3.9 for Aero and gaming though after installing Catalyst 7.7 - woot???

swimtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2007, 08:09 PM   #26
Howlin at the moon
 
Lelisevis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunderland, UK
Posts: 1,469
Lelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of lightLelisevis is a glorious beacon of light
System Specs

5.9's across the board with this setup.

5.4 with my previous AMD system but that was down to processor, everything else was 5.9
Lelisevis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2007, 02:00 AM   #27
DriverHeaven Senior Member