1024X768 0AA 0AF	1024X768 0AA 0AF
1280X960 4AA 8AF	1280X960 4AA 8AF
1600X1200 0AA 0AF	1600X1200 0AA 0AF
1600X1200 4AA 8AF	1600X1200 4AA 8AF

 

The results from UT2003 are quite interesting. Where as in 3D mark Nvidia was showing much less of a hit in AA/AF than the Radeon when both are applied in UT2003 the Radeon has much less of a performance hit. 1600x1200 is a good example of this. Without AA/AF the FX is showing 142.8fps in flyby, the Radeon 131.5fps. When AA/AF is enabled at 4x and 8x the FX falls 74.4fps (52%), the Radeon falls 60.4fps (45%). Both cards remained completely playable as you can see from the results, the Radeon however has that little extra performance at maximum settings.

Next: Aquamark & EF2