
|
1. Introduction | 2. Benchmarking(1) | 3. Benchmarking(2) | 4. Benchmarking(3) | 5. Image Quality | 6. O/C & Conclusion | |
| ATI 9800 Pro 256 mb review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Overclocking:
Overclocking the card is very simple, all that is required is a simple movement of the slider for either core or memory speed. Using Radclocker the maximum stable speeds with no artifacting were 427Mhz Core and 375Mhz Memory. An increase of 47mhz (11%) on the core and 25mhz (7%) on the RAM. (Because the Radeon uses DDR RAM the actual total increase to the memory speed is 50mhz from 700mhz to 750mhz). Comparing the overclock of the 128mb and 256mb cards shows that the potential overclock on both is almost identical. Both increased by 11% core and 7% memory.
The above results show an increase of 9% with both settings.
UT’s results with no AA or AF show a small increase in Flyby however when 6xAA and 16xAF are used the flyby difference is 12fps, a 10% increase in performance. Conclusion: As the tests show the Radeon 9800 Pro 256mb does provide faster performance than its 128mb counterpart. From an image quality perspective you will see no change in normal use; both cards have very high image quality in 3D and 2D when performing the same tasks. For the performance user the 256mb card is equally as overclockable as the 128mb version. Pricing for the cards in the USA shows about $60 of a difference at newegg.com. In the UK komplett.co.uk show a £90 difference between the two.
If money was no object
taking all of the above into consideration, if I was to buy one of the
cards today I would chose the ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 256mb.
1. Introduction | 2. Benchmarking(1) | 3. Benchmarking(2) | 4. Benchmarking(3) | 5. Image Quality | 6. O/C & Conclusion | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||