|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Dec 19, 2007, 06:10 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: 3rd Captial of Canada, Igloo City
Posts: 4,653
|
For most of my music - foobar2000 running in 24bit kernel stream mode.
For almost everything else, be it unsupported music format that foobar doesn't recognize, or movie files I use Media Player Classic, Cowon jetAudio, or PowerDVD Ultra.
__________________

>>  <<
|
|
|
Dec 19, 2007, 06:11 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
Giggity!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ___
Posts: 4,273
|
winamp for music
I can't believe itunes is ahead, it's fecking horrible 
no accounting for taste I suppose.. 
|
|
|
Dec 20, 2007, 12:32 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,356
|
I have finally found a Nullsoft Tray Control equivalent for foobar today (foo_AdvancedControl) and from now on it will use foobar instead of Winamp. And I think it I'm beginning to to like the foobar GUI 
|
|
|
Dec 21, 2007, 09:24 AM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
|
Foobar2000 for the win.
__________________
the cake is a pie?
|
|
|
Dec 25, 2007, 04:56 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: around
Posts: 792
|
No foobar2000? I hear it's pretty popular among the audiophiles. Btw, Winamp here. I like the new skin in version 5.5. I used to use LayerONE skin to get the same functionality.
|
|
|
Dec 27, 2007, 03:11 AM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: dirty Jer-Z
Posts: 14
|
Vlc
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2007, 09:49 AM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
DH's #1 Hustla and Pimp
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Dirty Dot
Posts: 6,854
|
wmp11 for anything and everything. winamp is useless now, the old theory of it using less ram is useless as wmp11 uses less, wmp classic is way way too basic. itunes is a piece of crap, high cpu/mem usage, clunky and so slow in terms of performance on all computers i've used it on. wmp11 organizes my liabary for media center nicely and is well integrated into windows.
__________________
Extended Specs:Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Music | Logitech Z-5500 THX 5.1 Surround Sound Speakers | 2 Lite-On 20x S-ATA Burners | ATI TV Wonder Elite | Cooler Master Mystique (Black) w/ Side Window | Logitech G7 Mouse | Logitech MX5000 Bluetooth Keyboard
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2008, 11:33 AM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fredericton.nb.ca
Posts: 64
|
Music I use AIMP2
media and videos I use KMplayer
|
|
|
Jan 3, 2008, 08:41 AM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 11
|
winamp mp3, subedit divx/mpeg
|
|
|
Jan 3, 2008, 02:31 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
S.N.A.F.U.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: at home
Posts: 959
|
I use The Core Media Player for everything basicly. Movie files that won't play with CMP (very few - almost none) I play with PowerDVD
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his hearth be broken. But then, does he ever truly live?
|
|
|
Jan 3, 2008, 03:41 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Berros Canyon, Nipomo, CA
Posts: 52
|
I use Lime Light because, well... I made it. The current public version isn't all that great, but the next one will have a lot more.
|
|
|
Jan 3, 2008, 04:07 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Epic Phail at Lief
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,739
|
Media Player through and through 
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2008, 04:24 AM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 27
|
Foobar2000. Less CPU, better sound quality and low memory usage. 
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2008, 07:36 AM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thiagodm
Foobar2000. Less CPU, better sound quality and low memory usage. 
|
Compared to what? Winamp for example: CPU, RAM and disk space usage is the same as foobar. The sound quality is arguable because it's a subjective feeling. I personally don't hear any difference between winamp and foobar.
|
|
|
Jan 6, 2008, 11:31 AM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington,Texas
Posts: 4
|
I like VLC Player
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
| |