|
| Notices |
DriverHeaven is currently recruiting for the AWOMO Beta Test / Elite Op Team. AWOMO is a digital download service for games, and we're looking to expand the beta team. If you're interested. Sign up as a member here at DriverHeaven and then head HERE to submit your details. Thanks
For more info on AWOMO visit their site HERE
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Jul 16, 2005, 10:18 AM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,772
Rep Power: 0
|
China Says It's Prepared to use Nukes Against US
China says it is willing to use nuclear weapons against the US if it is attacked by the US in a confrontation over Taiwan.
General Zhu Chenghu, a Major General in the Peoples Liberation Army, stated that if America tries to aid Taiwan by drawing missiles and other "position-guided ammunition" that it will "have to respond with nuclear weapons".
"If the Americans are determined to interfere [then] we will be determined to respond," Zhu stated in the article. He also stated that Americans will have to be prepared that "hundreds of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."
Source
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 10:28 AM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,501
Rep Power: 47

|
Bah, nothing surprising... Superpower wars! Been a while!
You do understand this will be a 3rd world war... It's just like that ze end of ze world flash clip... Not good!  Time will tell (I hope I get spared  )
----> Nukes were the worst creation ever. 
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 10:46 AM
|
#3
|
|
VETUS INFLATIO
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Red Lodge UK
Posts: 15,923
|
old news brother, we have been playing cat and mouse with their conventional subs and aircraft for sometime...
The cold war may have ended in Europe but the Chinese military has been preparing for their own terrible end of the world war for a long time....
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 11:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
Obamaman
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gefle, Sweden
Posts: 3,202
Rep Power: 39

|
Why would a general say that he's not prepared to use the weapons he has in defense of his country? A general doing so would be replaced anywhere.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 11:17 AM
|
#5
|
|
To live is to fight!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: A Dojo
Posts: 399
Rep Power: 0
|
They would be foolish to do so, and we for doing anything to temp them so. Nuclear weapons were indeed a foolish creation, but as with all weapons, they never fathomed what may occur in the future due to them.
One way or another, there will be someone stupid enough to think their actual use would be beneficial, since I am sure they in the end along with whatever country they belong to will cease to exist.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 11:34 AM
|
#6
|
|
Watching
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The void
Posts: 4,704
Rep Power: 0
|
China's so small (in physical size not population)... if they send nukes @ US - the US will be able to flatten the whole bloomin country - they'd be idiots to use nukes
We need a real life superman 4 lol
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 11:50 AM
|
#7
|
|
Driver Heaven's MVP
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 860
Rep Power: 0
|
We all know that this is how it's going to end, whether we like it or not.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/flash/endofworld.html
Last edited by Xx#1BallerxX; Jul 16, 2005 at 12:16 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 11:53 AM
|
#8
|
|
To live is to fight!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: A Dojo
Posts: 399
Rep Power: 0
|
Yeah I remember that, good stuff
Australia- WTF? lol
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 12:04 PM
|
#9
|
|
DH's #1 Hustla and Pimp
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Dirty Dot
Posts: 6,948
Rep Power: 50

|
them chinese are tricking us guys! they have more than that up their sleeve, just look at how good they are at ripping us off! lol
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 12:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,501
Rep Power: 47

|
tastyweat... what the hell are you saying?
China 9,326,410 sq km, (3,600,947 sq miles)
United States 9.166,600 sq km, (3,539,242 sq miles)
They are bigger... 
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 12:18 PM
|
#11
|
|
Driver Heaven's MVP
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 860
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sandok
tastyweat... what the hell are you saying?
China 9,326,410 sq km, (3,600,947 sq miles)
United States 9.166,600 sq km, (3,539,242 sq miles)
They are bigger... 
|
LOL.......he doesn't make any sense at all. lol.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 12:24 PM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wu Han, Hu Bei, P.R.China
Posts: 1,236
Rep Power: 0
|
That general didn't say he would attack USA City. Defence≠Offensive: He meant if US come to the territory of China or China's Tai Wan, China probably launch nuck to the territory.
Your title is "...against..." Is that you wanna against China, or you say so about the topic?
Edit: No matter what media reports, most of Chinese people love peace, and I think most of American people also...
Last edited by classic_leon; Jul 16, 2005 at 12:34 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 01:54 PM
|
#13
|
|
Watching
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The void
Posts: 4,704
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sandok
tastyweat... what the hell are you saying?
China 9,326,410 sq km, (3,600,947 sq miles)
United States 9.166,600 sq km, (3,539,242 sq miles)
They are bigger... 
|
huh... i alway thought china was small and puny 
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 01:56 PM
|
#14
|
|
is having a sexy party
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 1,780
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by classic_leon
That general didn't say he would attack USA City. Defence≠Offensive: He meant if US come to the territory of China or China's Tai Wan, China probably launch nuck to the territory.
Your title is "...against..." Is that you wanna against China, or you say so about the topic?
Edit: No matter what media reports, most of Chinese people love peace, and I think most of American people also...
|
well they might like peace, but when it comes to nuking other countries, i dont think the people really get a say in wat the goverment does. damn communist bastards! 
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 03:47 PM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Warpy
China says it is willing to use nuclear weapons against the US if it is attacked by the US in a confrontation over Taiwan.
General Zhu Chenghu, a Major General in the Peoples Liberation Army, stated that if America tries to aid Taiwan by drawing missiles and other "position-guided ammunition" that it will "have to respond with nuclear weapons".
"If the Americans are determined to interfere [then] we will be determined to respond," Zhu stated in the article. He also stated that Americans will have to be prepared that "hundreds of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."
Source
|
..And the Chinese will have to prepare for thier entrie country becomeing a parkeing
lot with a population of zero Uninhabitable for hundreds of years.. Is taiwan really
worth the death of every man woman and child in china for them??? What good will
it do them to have taiwan if thier all dead?  Becouse now becouse of that threat
if they lauch anything our way there will likely be a full nuclar responce long before
before the 1st bomb hits. I guess it would sove thier population problems.
Btw the words of the general was not the openion of the government and he
later reniged on that warning backing away from the threat he made. Sounded
like something a Hitler would say. The cinese are carefully backing away from the
threat. Ment to scare amaricans into submission. Sort of like terorism.
We need to get some US and UN forces and arms down there to assist taiwan ASAP
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 05:30 PM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 311
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Neon_Cowboy
We need to get some US and UN forces and arms down there to assist taiwan ASAP
|
I know at one time we constantly maintained one of our Pacific battle groups near Taiwan, just incase China decided to do something, I doubt that policy has changed. As far as us protecting Taiwan from China, we have pledged to protect them as our allies, and I doubt this threat will change that.
We will also never nuke the general populace of China, it would be unnecessay, if we take out there military installations (no small number of casualties granted) that would be enough.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 05:41 PM
|
#17
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,728
|
TW, i think you were thinking of japan
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 06:35 PM
|
#18
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,516
Rep Power: 57
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Neon_Cowboy
..And the Chinese will have to prepare for thier entrie country becomeing a parkeing
lot with a population of zero Uninhabitable for hundreds of years.. Is taiwan really
worth the death of every man woman and child in china for them??? What good will
it do them to have taiwan if thier all dead?  Becouse now becouse of that threat
if they lauch anything our way there will likely be a full nuclar responce long before
before the 1st bomb hits. I guess it would sove thier population problems.
Btw the words of the general was not the openion of the government and he
later reniged on that warning backing away from the threat he made. Sounded
like something a Hitler would say. The cinese are carefully backing away from the
threat. Ment to scare amaricans into submission. Sort of like terorism.
We need to get some US and UN forces and arms down there to assist taiwan ASAP
|
The last thing this country needs is another war in another country. No one wins in Nuclear strikes, and it wouldn't just be limited to just China & USA. If you really want to hurt China totally stop all business with them. Don't allow any of their products in this country. We depend on low cost but I'd rather buy stuff from Europe (or here), and pay more. I guess Walmart would have to close then. BTW, I thought China already annexed Taiwan anyway? Once again USA World Police to the rescue, we really need to stop doing that shit.
Last edited by Necrosis; Jul 16, 2005 at 07:01 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 06:58 PM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 553
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Necrosis
The last thing this country needs is another war in another country. No one wins in Nuclear strikes, and it wouldn't just be limited to just China & USA. If you really want to hurt China totally stop all business with them. Don't allow any of their products in this country. We depend on free goods but I'd rather buy stuff from Europe (or here), and pay more. I guess Walmart would have to close then. BTW, I thought China already annexed Taiwan anyway? Once again USA World Police to the rescue, we really need to stop doing that shit.
|
I agree with you, you kill the trade with China and they will fall. No more badly made items that break on the first day or blow up in your face.. yay
America, F**k Yeah!
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 07:20 PM
|
#20
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yoda133113
I know at one time we constantly maintained one of our Pacific battle groups near Taiwan, just incase China decided to do something, I doubt that policy has changed. As far as us protecting Taiwan from China, we have pledged to protect them as our allies, and I doubt this threat will change that.
We will also never nuke the general populace of China, it would be unnecessay, if we take out there military installations (no small number of casualties granted) that would be enough.
|
If the use chemical or nuclear on us on US soil, we will respond with nukes thats
a given. If it a tradional fight of couse no WMD would be needed or used.
Chinas goverment aslo has said the gernals openion is not thier policy but they
would goto traditional war with the US over it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Necrosis
The last thing this country needs is another war in another country. No one wins in Nuclear strikes, and it wouldn't just be limited to just China & USA. If you really want to hurt China totally stop all business with them. Don't allow any of their products in this country. We depend on low cost but I'd rather buy stuff from Europe (or here), and pay more. I guess Walmart would have to close then. BTW, I thought China already annexed Taiwan anyway? Once again USA World Police to the rescue, we really need to stop doing that shit.
|
You guys don't get it. I'm not advocating a 1st strike but simply stateing what will be done in responce to such an attack on US soil. nukes would be fired from silos all over the us as well as suberminces and carriers and our soilos located over seas.
There would be no debate about this they lauch we launch it not a debatable sitatuion. Thier talking about hundreds of cities being destoyed not some tatical bombing or millitary targest. Thier refering to killing massies of our civillians/citizens wich is just short of terroirm just to jest such a thing. Thier threadting to kill masses of amercans if we interfere with thier acts of aression and ocupation of a independant nation. It kinda like the jehadists that threaten to kill americals if we interfere and don't stop aiding isreal. Sounds afully close...
taiwan been sperated since 1949 from china but china has been in denial wants them back, along with thier thier resouces, and thier now global technoligical importance. We simply
can not allow it as in our and the taiwans intrests are both served by them remaining
independant.
If there is UN invovlement the China is pretty screw'd...
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Jul 16, 2005 at 07:26 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 07:39 PM
|
#21
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 311
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Neon_Cowboy
If the use chemical or nuclear on us on US soil, we will respond with nukes thats a given. If it a tradional fight of couse no WMD would be needed or used.
|
I recognize that, i'm saying that we would nuke the areas that need nuking, not just turn the country into a parking lot, nuking their bases would kill the surrounding cities, but would leave most people alive, and end a war (no military, no war)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by necrosis
I thought China already annexed Taiwan anyway? Once again USA World Police to the rescue, we really need to stop doing that shit.
|
No it would be the USA protecting an allie that we have sworn in the past to protect, if China invaded another of our allies I would expect the same response from us, that we protect them as best we can.
Last edited by yoda133113; Jul 16, 2005 at 07:44 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 07:40 PM
|
#22
|
|
Back in London
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 1,794
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tastyweat
China's so small (in physical size not population)... if they send nukes @ US - the US will be able to flatten the whole bloomin country - they'd be idiots to use nukes
We need a real life superman 4 lol
|
china is as big as the USA...
china will flatten then US = more people... a lot more determined people... plus the US is weak compared to the US economically and has no chance in a major world war.. china will overrun the middle east, not attack europe just defend the oil... the US and europe will be dry.
china is the new superpower.. but as we can see again most americans have the funny ideal they are the biggest country, the richest, the best of, etc... when its so not...
china
total: 9,596,960 sq km
land: 9,326,410 sq km
water: 270,550 sq km
1,306,313,812 people
purchasing power parity - $7.262 trillion (2004 est.) -- thanks to slave labour (nearly) but would you want to pay twice teh amount for ur ipod, or trainers etc? no? well thats why they have a lowish gdp
usa
total: 9,631,418 sq km
land: 9,161,923 sq km
water: 469,495 sq km
295,734,134 people
purchasing power parity - $11.75 trillion (2004 est.)
europe
3,976,372 sq km
456,953,258 (July 2005 est.) people
purchasing power parity - $11.65 trillion (2004 est.)
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2005, 08:40 PM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Infinity
Posts: 3,682
Rep Power: 0
|
Lets the games begin...
United States is occupying how many countries? China is occupying how many countries?
United States has how many troops ready to fight? *cough cough* China has how many trrops ready to fight and die!?
I know whos side i will be on....
|
|
|
|