|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:13 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
|
The problem is lawmakers attempting to rectify problems that they do not understand. They dont understand the technology, and thus make huge errors in the way they word bills..so they end up having massive impact. This is just like that law passed in a couple of states that basically makes it illegal to have a firewall on your computer...hardware or software. It's ignorant.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:23 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,517
|
Erm... Did they really do that? That's frickin nuts man...
GJ
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:27 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,517
|
But anyway yes you are right. A lot of these guys probably still don't know how to program their VCR's (a lot of them probably think the damn things are the work of the devil no doubt) let alone understand the implications of computer technology.
Why the hell should they be allowed free a free run to do as they please to the legislative process?
GJ
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 10:17 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,427
|
Quote:
Originally posted by raid517
Erm... Did they really do that? That's frickin nuts man...
GJ
|
And to think you would vote against the people trying to protect our freedoms... 
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 10:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,517
|
The guy proposing that bill is a Republican man.
GJ
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 10:30 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
|
Well, the thing with the firewall was only in certain states, not a federal thing...I'm not even sure if it passed or not. Thankfully, this bill will probably not pass.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 06:44 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,427
|
That guy must be a RINO or something.....
In general Dems are for more control, bigger gov.. And repubs. are for smaller gov. less control-- in general anyway..
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 07:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,539
|
Quote:
|
Litman said that under the Induce Act, products like ReplayTV, peer-to-peer networks and even the humble VCR could be outlawed because they can potentially be used to infringe copyrights. Web sites such as Tucows that host peer-to-peer clients like the Morpheus software are also at risk for "inducing" infringement, Litman warned
|
notice potentially
just like alcohol can potentially kill, but they don't ban that
just like a car can potentially be kill someone, but they don't ban them
just like a gun can potentially be used for murder, but they don't ban them
they have no idea what they are passing laws about, they need qualified neutral technicians to explain what these products do
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:13 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
|
Quote:
Originally posted by raid517
The guy proposing that bill is a Republican man.
GJ
|
No no...he may be a republican, but the operative term in this case would be "moron".
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:18 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
E Pluribus Unum
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,203
|
Quote:
Originally posted by raid517
The guy proposing that bill is a Republican man.
GJ
|
The attack on our personal liberties in small ways like this is in no way monopolized by one party. To suggest otherwise, as you're doing, is silly.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:25 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,517
|
Well I don't happen to think it's silly at all. Sorry.
And we are talking about the incumbent party in power.
If it was some kind of power sharing deal as has been discussed in other threads then maybe we can talk about some kind of collective responsibility. Until then, no.
GJ
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:38 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
|
Trying to contort these events to somehow justify that it is republicans invading our personal liberties is moronic, and stereotypical.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 09:53 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,517
|
Well like I said, the guys a republican. Pretty much every RIAA, MPAA loving bill in recent years have been introduced by republicans. The Patriot act and Guantanamo (aka locking people up without charge) are all Republican inspired entities (despite whoever for their own personal political gain later claimed to support them). All the recent legislation allowing the authorities almost unlimited access to your phones and your PCs are republican sponsored policies.
In many ways far from removing government from people's lives, this government has decided that its role is to have it's nose firmly rammed up peoples butts.
Ultimately I don't really care. It doesn't affect anyone in my country. And if it ever did, then I would probably feel inspired to go out and get a gun and make my dissatisfaction quite plain.
But hey, you believe what you want.
GJ
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2004, 10:12 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
|
You attacked ZD when he made the comment about dems/libs having a more "swinging" (as he put it) lifestyle, you claimed he was making generalizations...which he was. As are you, now. I am a republican...I support the guantanamo bay policies for reasons I'm not going to discuss now..but that doesnt mean that people that believe about the same things as me are solely responsible for the disolval of citizens personal liberty. That is a very childish and shortsighted assumption.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|