Zeitgeist Movie. - Page 3

OldBuzzard · Mar 13, 2008, 08:54 PM

I'd tell you, but they are watching, and I don't want them to come looking for me

[hobo]eclipse · Mar 13, 2008, 09:07 PM

shit buzzard, yer prolly one of them

mental picture: oldbuzzard at his workstation:

"oooh, oooh big boss man with a badge larger than mine, look over here at the Americans talking about liberty, sound money, sensible foreign policies and leaders who look out for the best interest of the people instead of just seeing them as consumers, what are we gonna do with em, huh? huh? plz, plz let me push the button!?!?"

OmegaRED · Mar 13, 2008, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by power_drain

Im sorry if I didnt actually bring up issues within the doc, but I am extremly lazy, and I have talked about this documentary plenty of times. The 911 conspiracy, part two, even showed me video evidence, proving that there were bombs.. it showed smoke comming out of the windows before it even collapsed, signalling a bomb. Not just in one place, but in many places. This is all I need to know that the government has lied to me,

I already know you are lazy because anyone with the motivation to find the truth would know there were NO BOMBS in the towers and they fell because some fucking fanatics flew planes into them. Perhaps you think those planes were holographic images...goddamn you've got a lot of nerve calling me ignorant when the controlled demolition theory has been squashed a million times.

Quote:

but using those kind of examples are going to do nothing but lower your credibility.

Why don't you shut up already and go read those links Buzzard posted. It should clue you in that a skinhead was handing this video there's nothing but bullshit in it.

Quote:

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

Journal Of Debunking* 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage

And, if reading makes your head hurt...here's a video from NOVA on PBS

Why the Towers Fell PBS 9/11 Documentary

Judas · Mar 14, 2008, 10:18 AM

i'd like to know how jet feul.. in confined areas can reach such temperatures to do the damage it did in the short time..

i'd also like to know what the rapid gunshot sounds were before the places even hit....

i'd like to know how metal that is saposed to have twisted or sheered... managed to end up with the perfectly angled cut they ended up with, i'd also like to know how motel steel remained molten steel for so long...

i'd also like to know exactly how a building, that had already conceived of airplane hits, and have made thebuilding able to withstand such hits, managed it.....

How does a "terrorist" that took pilot lessons and failed measerably ... even according to the teacher that delt directly with the "suspected" terrorist.... stating that he couldn't fly a plane stright if his life depended on it.. managed to hit such a wildly hard to hit target so perfectly.

How are some of these people so easily identifiable.. but others not.... for people having been "saposedly" crashed... singed and covered in a molten steel for long periods of time.. how the hell are they able to identify them and find thier personal goods so easily... while people on the top and lower floors basically noneexcistant...

the list goes on..

and video i've found and anything of read that has been put up for debunking... has usually turned up just as badly if not worse one sided then the conspiry..

Anyone can say that it's been debunked a million times. .but it also has turned around that the debunking theory has turned up short yet again...

I'd also like to know how a building, with that amount of reinforcement could possibly fall free fall, i've yet to see any building... doesn't matter the scale.... freefall that quickly.... hell even some of the demolitions don't fall that quickly..... nor does it make sense how some other buildings happen to fall so quickly...

or where the video recordings that WERE there.... to see some of the details.. happen to be locked up by the government... explain to me... how can you possibly debunk that kind of evidence.... wtf would be the purpose of such an act... wouldn't it be just easier to throw us the tape.. watch it? The longer they hold onto it, the longer it's likely to be edited....

Theres alot of damn good reasons for them to do this... non of which should be justifiable...

but to simply say... "no non of this is possible, non of this would ever have happened in that manner...." is no different then some of the parents thinking thier children are angels... while they go do drastic and unimagineable.... things....

Scale it... you get enough people together... to work out the details.. and have the time... you can do anything at all.. even the impossible, or what was thought as impossible... and the less other people know about it.. the better....

Omega.. i really think your dreaming up a wonderful world.... i wish i could live in your reality....

OmegaRED · Mar 14, 2008, 02:09 PM

I'd like to know how people could be so stupid as to believe the government planted truckloads of explosives in the towers...and no one noticed. And to what purpose? Iraq? Bush was going to Iraq with or without 9/11 all he needed to say was WMD's and it was a done deal.

Judas · Mar 14, 2008, 03:17 PM

you don't need truckloads.. and it's not hard to get anything through any form of security or through the doors of any building wearing the right equipment or having the right name tags....

i don't know how stupid people could be to consider that government to be as corrupt free as they think they are......

**Vikingod** · Mar 14, 2008, 03:46 PM

Judas, you crack me up. I bet the walls of your house are covered in magazine clippings with highlighted sections connected with multicolored yarn and thumb-tacks. I'm not sure you live in any reality, let alone Omega's. Every question you asked has been answered, or can be answered, by some understanding of the forces at work. I also suggest you pick up a book regarding the design and construction of the Trade Towers. Then again, I guess it's easier to watch a movie about some wacky conspiracy theory and take what they say for granted.

The problem I have with conspiracies such as this, is they are derived by people with no base knowledge of the subject matter. It's just people thinking something up and coming to broad conclusions, or worse, getting something factual, and misenterpreting to suit they're own needs.

OldBuzzard · Mar 14, 2008, 04:06 PM

Viking...it's pointless to argue with these people.

Logic means nothing to them.

Facts mean nothing to them.

Physics mean nothing to them.

The believe it becuse they WANT to believe it, and nothing is going to stand in their way.

Judas · Mar 14, 2008, 04:10 PM

Thing is i don't have any of either...

i don't think up weird conspiracies..... far fetched or not.... i watch both.. without bias.... and i typically try and find evidence for myself to see who is indeed telling the truth... Or half truths.. or complete full out lies... partial lies... mixed with truth... or if some of these people are just throwing thier own personal figures into the mix...

Frankly i don't beleive anyone... No one seems to be completely honest with anything.. at all..... Alot of people seem to be full out and out blind to the possibilities of the other side having some of it's theories and facts or infactual evidence/proof...information straight.. and vice versa....

And quite often... 90% of the anything that was indeed filmed... is either cut out, or thrown together to proove the point in thier favor anyways.

I don't watch zeitgiest and go "wtf, why don't people understand this.."

I watched zeitgiest and consider what it had to offer for information, and i'll add it to my already growing bit of "possibly usefull or maybe useless" list of information, a reference of sorts.

I also watched the entire 4 hours of the "frontiers of construction" of the those 2 towers... the most interesting part of all was the design including both private and commercial airplane hits... as well as possibly larger future designs..... it's quite a brilliant idea that they came up with, not to mention the REAL and at the time of building footage.

Now i'm not saying that some of the stuff that has happened wasn't possible... it's just highly unlikely... for the stuff to unfold EXACTLY as it did, 2 airplanes hitting a building of thier size, and bringing them down as they did, doesn't make sense at all...

When demolition people can stare in aww at the way they fell.... i wonder how many of them looked in horror not at the fact they were falling, but how they were falling and how utterly nearly impossible for not only one, but both of them to fall as they did...

The pancake theory has been brought up and thrown down countless times... i simply refuse to accept that as a possibility.. as the factors that play into it... doesn't make any sense even with the video proof that is available...

How many demolitions has thier been around the world with large buildings.. not even of this size... brought down via imploding? Lots, how many, even with the proffesionals around the world.... have brought down a building only to find it hadn't imploded as it should have.. even with ALL the charges going off correctly and the works......

It's interesting... none the less.....

It's not that i don't beleive that the buildings came down as they did just because 2 planes hit it and fire and all that other crap happened... it's just that i find with my own current judgement.... that it's at the bottom of the "chances" scale vs the other possibilities evident.

And everyone has thier own reality.....

Judas · Mar 14, 2008, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldBuzzard

Viking...it's pointless to argue with these people.

Logic means nothing to them.

Facts mean nothing to them.

Physics mean nothing to them.

The believe it becuse they WANT to believe it, and nothing is going to stand in their way.

So a few links to a few dozen "official" or non official or whatever website.. dictates facts/physics/logic?

Either way i look at it, both sides are idiots... if someone has to tell you what is, or you have to read it, watch it, or whatever.. and you can't be bothered to sit back and actually stew over it all, and possibly not even make up your mind about something.... i find that your just as bad as the other....

I'd like to prove some of these things for myself... but i can't atm..... maybe never.. don't know...

[hobo]eclipse · Mar 14, 2008, 04:20 PM

+1 Judas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vikingod

The problem I have with conspiracies such as this, is they are derived by people with no base knowledge of the subject matter.

that is a flat out false statement

seems 9/11 may be the biggest "zeitgeist" of them all, because no one wants to talk of anything other than it

OmegaRED · Mar 14, 2008, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldBuzzard

Viking...it's pointless to argue with these people.

Logic means nothing to them.

Facts mean nothing to them.

Physics mean nothing to them.

The believe it becuse they WANT to believe it, and nothing is going to stand in their way.

Ain't that the truth. I blame pot smoking college students for 90% of the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

It's such an insult to the memory of all the people who died on 9/11 and even to the threat of terrorism itself to persist in such delusions as these conspiracies suggest. People don't want to believe in terrorism they'd prefer shadowy governmental figures who will never be discovered...maybe it helps their dumbasses sleep at night

Judas · Mar 14, 2008, 05:50 PM

That's complete bullshit omega...

The search for truth is an honorable trait..... reguardless of what it could end up meaning..

pulling the "insult to those that died" crap is a horrible example of how far some people go to discredit someone else.

Seriously i can't beleive you just did that, that indeed IS an insult to the entire human race imo....

And the twin towers was only meerly an example.... one of which unfortuneately everyone seems to want to DWELL on.....