|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Jan 26, 2008, 01:54 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
|
Abortion
On this 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, I would like to share my views on the issue of abortion.
Life begins at the point of conception. No one can deny that after a human being is conceived it will develop into the very same being as those debating this issue. What astounds me is that those who favor abortion went through an identical development stage as the being they are condemning to death. Would these very same people agree that a similiar choice should have been made about their own existence? Abortion today is used primarily as a birth control of convenience because people are too self-centered to take precautions. They prefer their own pleasurable self-indulgence over the care and sanctity of the life they created. What ever happened to taking responsibility for one's actions in this country? Is it too much to ask a woman who has conceived to place the child into adoption? Nine months of discomfort is nothing compared to life in prison for voluntary manslaughter! Does the father of the child have a say in this? And what about the constitution of the United States? Are not all people conceived in this country deserving of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? I believe abortion is a crime against humanity and should be outlawed. We need to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision and get back to cherishing life in this country. For a country that murders it's children cannot be far from self destruction.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 02:24 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
In the Octagon
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,635
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
On this 35th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, I would like to share my views on the issue of abortion.
Life begins at the point of conception. No one can deny that after a human being is conceived it will develop into the very same being as those debating this issue. What astounds me is that those who favor abortion went through an identical development stage as the being they are condemning to death. Would these very same people agree that a similiar choice should have been made about their own existence? Abortion today is used primarily as a birth control of convenience because people are too self-centered to take precautions. They prefer their own pleasurable self-indulgence over the care and sanctity of the life they created. What ever happened to taking responsibility for one's actions in this country? Is it too much to ask a woman who has conceived to place the child into adoption? Nine months of discomfort is nothing compared to life in prison for voluntary manslaughter! Does the father of the child have a say in this? And what about the constitution of the United States? Are not all people conceived in this country deserving of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? I believe abortion is a crime against humanity and should be outlawed. We need to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision and get back to cherishing life in this country. For a country that murders it's children cannot be far from self destruction.
|
Question for you Joe (and anyone else who is Anti-Abortion),
If Abortion is murder and murder is a punishable crime then what should the punishment for women who have abortions be? Should they be put in jail for life or given the death penalty? I await your response.
__________________

Coming after July 19th:
Fedor vs Sylvia, Arlovski vs Rothwell, A.Silva vs Irvin, Barnett vs Rizzo.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 02:50 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Mars
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,885
|
Well, I suppose I'll go ahead and share my views on your views, in that case...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Life begins at the point of conception.
|
It's difficult to be consistent with this point of view. What about life that is created without conception, or identical twins, when do their lives start?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
No one can deny that after a human being is conceived it will develop into the very same being as those debating this issue.
|
If kept in the proper environment, and cared for appropriately, an embryo after conception has the potential to develop into a human being. The exact same statement can be made of a human egg, before fertilization. If kept in the proper environment, and cared for appropriately, a human egg has the potential to develop into a human being.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
What astounds me is that those who favor abortion went through an identical development stage as the being they are condemning to death.
|
People don't favour abortion, they favour the right of a woman to choose what she wants to do with her body.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Would these very same people agree that a similiar choice should have been made about their own existence?
|
No, but most people have brain activity. Tapeworms have more neural activity than embryos do before a certain point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Abortion today is used primarily as a birth control of convenience because people are too self-centered to take precautions.
|
A good reason to advocate other methods of birth control.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
They prefer their own pleasurable self-indulgence over the care and sanctity of the life they created.
|
People create skin cells all the time, do skin cells deserve care and sanctity as well?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Is it too much to ask a woman who has conceived to place the child into adoption?
|
It is too much to force a woman to carry what is effectively a parasite in her body against her will.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Nine months of discomfort is nothing compared to life in prison for voluntary manslaughter!
|
Good thing abortion is legal in the developed world, and women who get them aren't going to prison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Does the father of the child have a say in this?
|
No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
And what about the constitution of the United States?
|
Not applicable to most of the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
Are not all people conceived in this country deserving of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
|
People, yes, however, fetuses are not people. Similar to how an egg isn't a chicken.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
I believe abortion is a crime against humanity and should be outlawed.
|
Crimes against humanity are defined as attacks against civilian populations. Fetuses are not part of any civilian population.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOEBIALEK
For a country that murders it's children cannot be far from self destruction.
|
Right, because clearly North America, Europe and Asia are all on the brink of destruction when compared Africa, South America and the Middle East.
__________________
--
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 03:09 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
In the Octagon
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,635
|
I would also like to know if you are against abortion in the cases where a woman has been raped, has a medical condition and giving birth would kill her, has a disease or drug addiction which would cause birth difficulties to the child.
In these cases it would be the womans choice and perhaps if her life is in danger the family or doctors choice.
__________________

Coming after July 19th:
Fedor vs Sylvia, Arlovski vs Rothwell, A.Silva vs Irvin, Barnett vs Rizzo.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 03:32 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 3,595
|
I think the laws as is - are about as 'fair' as they ever could be..
Consider this situation...
A woman mis-caries - is she now suspect of murder? Perhaps negligent homicide?
Or...
What about rape victims - do you *really* think that child would be loved like one conceived with a loved one? Hell, I seen first hand, hatred for the father aimed at the child after a divorce - that kid, is in prison at 17 years old.
What 'typically' happens to kids from rape? Any studies on this? I have doubts that the majority become 'valued citizens', but are more likely 'problems for society' - making yet more un-wanted children and perpetuating the 'dysfunctional' family lineage.
To that point - if abortions become illegal... how many guys will be charged with Rape just so the woman can be allowed an abortion (assuming the above exception would be available)
Do *you* want to be the one wrongly accused of rape (DNA tests confirm it) - when it was consentual...??? How many times has this already happen from scared girls too afraid to admit to mommy and daddy -'I made a mistake and a baby'.
Making abortions illegal would, imho, likely cause bigger issues like the above that would be more devastating to a *known* life - than an unknown life (miscarried, suffering from un-treatable disease etc..) - aka embryo.
making abortions illegal will also cause blackmarket abortions more popular...
Look at all the problems *that* would expose us all too.
"The FBI raids an illegal abortion clinic, 3 waiting patients were killed from crossfire during the raid"
Where would the ramifications of this law end?
To me - 'life' as defined currently seems most fair and logical for both sides of this argument.
Quote:
|
No one can deny that after a human being is conceived it will develop into the very same being as those debating this issue.
|
1) my parents were smart enough to not make a baby they could not take care of - what about those kids that; sure they breath air - thus, 'alive' - but are latch key kids, never get attention from over-worked parents, basically raise them selves - is this more fair? not to me.
2) Its also argued that; what if medicine can predict if an embryo will develop with some un-treatable disease or condition, is it 'moral' to abort that embryo?
On one hand, there are likely mothers out there that would be able to handle the extra care needed for that child - but I also know, there are many who could not. Do you abort then? But thats another debate I suppose.. ??
All in all I think abortion is, and should be, a personal decision and should be based on *their* beliefs and *their* circumstances alone.
Too many laws already besides - its already getting to be; a need in public schools to teach all the laws in this country - like reading or math.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 03:36 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
In the Octagon
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,635
|
Not for nothing, but I noticed JOEBIALEK posts these standard opinion pieces word for word in various forums then doesn't post again. He's little more than a bot. While I don't think that's against the rules here it does waste everyones time, this is a debate forum and if you're not gonna stick around for a debate this thread should be locked/deleted.
View topic - Abortion - PE.com Forums
BestSyndication Forums :: View topic - Abortion
Abortion - AudioReview Forums
Abortion - Wisconsin Forums at theBubbler
It goes on and on... just type "JOEBIALEK abortion" in Google you'll see he's done this hundreds of times.
__________________

Coming after July 19th:
Fedor vs Sylvia, Arlovski vs Rothwell, A.Silva vs Irvin, Barnett vs Rizzo.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 03:54 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,631
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaRED
... if you're not gonna stick around for a debate this thread should be locked/deleted.
|
normally i'd agree - but I would like to leave this thread here to let the members of driverheaven to discuss their view on the issue
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 04:01 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
In the Octagon
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,635
|
I disagree, if a real member wants to make a thread about abortion they will do so.
Leaving this thread up just wastes all of our time as we're responding to him and he's a hit and run spammer.
__________________

Coming after July 19th:
Fedor vs Sylvia, Arlovski vs Rothwell, A.Silva vs Irvin, Barnett vs Rizzo.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 04:12 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,631
|
i don't mean for everyone to respond to the OP, but to respond to each other - that's the spirit of this forum, open debate by all
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 04:25 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Mars
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaRED
|
I noticed the same, but he's been a member here for a while, and actually has responded to other posters.
__________________
--
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 04:34 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
In the Octagon
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,635
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zelig
I noticed the same, but he's been a member here for a while, and actually has responded to other posters.
|
All he said was "good points" months later. He's a bot or something man.
Quote:
|
i don't mean for everyone to respond to the OP, but to respond to each other - that's the spirit of this forum, open debate by all
|
So far we're all in agreement, so where's the debate?
__________________

Coming after July 19th:
Fedor vs Sylvia, Arlovski vs Rothwell, A.Silva vs Irvin, Barnett vs Rizzo.
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 05:31 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,631
|
like you said, so far, it's been less than three hours since the thread was posted
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2008, 05:34 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 17,562
|
i was going to make a post earlier, but they are pretty much in-line with what Maddogg6 have said.
|
|
|
|