Maddogg6

In Bushes press conference - he mentioned forging ahead with more free trade pacts with S. American Countries (Panama, Columbia were mentioned specifically)

Theres obviously very little accountability in what comes into our country.
Theres the pet food from china - and now possibly tooth paste too...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18841928/

If it were US origin - this mess would be all cleared up by now - but working with China is proving be difficult, if not impossible to demand any accountability.

Maybe a class action law suit on the WTO is in order.??
And why aren't they stepping up in putting pressure on getting this cleared up - they orginize the Chineese treaty - then leave us out cold when shit hits the fan...wtf.

And now Bush pushing for S.American treaties too.
Whats next for us when free trade with countries that have a history of being ran by cartels and drugs being the #1 money making export.

I dont see free trade being good for ANYONE but the developing country (who offers exploitable labor), big business (ready to take advantage of that said labor) and politicians who most likely received $$$ for convincing Americans free trade is a good idea.

Or Am I missing some positive attribute to all this... please explain.

(cant say I love the idea of another communist country as a super power either in light of the events recently with poisoned products imported from there)

Judas

Free trade?

don't know, but the "free" trade that the US has been doing to canada is costing canada millions and not a dime for the US... just take a gander at the softwood lumber bullshit. and that's just one thing...

I'm all for free trade within reason.... under certain specific rules, and making damn sure everyone abides by them.

__________________

Maddogg6

Oh great now canadians are turning anti-american too (j/k - sorta, I think... ) - I never heard about this, and it looks pretty complicated (I guess it has something to do with lumber being subsidized or something - I wont pretend to understand it all...??)

Who do we hold accountable in these matters - please don't say a 'world court' - thats just another layer of politics to profit from all this crap.

Is accountability no longer in fashion now?
(Bush & Sadam having WMD- oops, Chineese Import poison - oops, this complicated lumber deal you mention)
pfff wtf.

Ive never felt so much like a lowly peasant in all my life as I do now.

Zelig

A good summary of the softwood lumber disptue.

Free trade is good for everyone involved, provided that everyone follows the rules.

__________________
--

Judas

i think the ones accountable should be held amongst themselfs, (in the lumber ordeal, it'd be canadian and american), but i also think that in the case of the long dispute, with nothing being done, that a neutral party should be brought to lay down the law one way or another, someone with zero influence among either side, Course this would be ideal, everyone seems to want to lean one way or another for whatever reasons unfortuneatly.

The lumber BS is just one of many fiascos, another would be how canada has screwed it's own farmers over even conceiveable dark place.... Even when the Free trade works in our favor, canada has turned it around, it works both ways i guess,

For example, if a farmer wish to sell it's produce, they should be able to sell it where ever, including across the boarder, right, this makes sense correct? Yet Canada has imposed some rediluious laws that have ended up nailing the farmers that had attempted to do this, eventually putting them out of business as they "didn't follow" the apparently unmentioned rules. wtf?

At which point, it's been discussed everywhere that someone should be shot

__________________

Maddogg6

Yeah - I seen that - Im still a bit puzzled - as Im sure it involves understanding int'l trade law... (I mean, if Canada IS 'dumping' - then I see why its in dispute - But I also heard along time ago the Japaneese wre 'dumping' their cars in the US as well - but I don't think any countervailing duties were imposed on them - Toyota seems to be doing just fine...?? -

Again, I won't pretend to understand legal aspects about all this, except my perceptions (I'll admit *may* be way off) it sure seems few 'citizens' benefit as much as big business and politicians.

And, that last part (I bolded) requires accountability - which seems to be non-existent.

So - I'll re-clarify - IS it good? - not *can* it be good? Sounds like yet another example of why its bad - even for the US - if it created tensions with an otherwise friendly neighbor/nation - its not good for me in the long run.


OK - yet another example of how free trade has been used to screw innocent people.

Sounding more and more like, becuase there is no accountability - free trade is NOT good - for either sides 'citizens' now. - But sounds like the politicians are A OK with all this. huh? Bush is, at least, pushing to expand this idea into S.America too.

Judas

Well i think free trade is good yet, but the there seems to be political agendas and goverment control over specifics of what is considered to be freely traded or not. Imposing restrictions where the agreements made for free trade would normally allow it for no apparent reasons, or bills being made up and passed without a second thought when they harm either the partner to trade with OR themselves.

I think most of the issues are government oriented though.

__________________

Maddogg6

Agreed, But, will we ever escape this reality - ??? People in power historically have had agendas and thus abused their powers.

My blood pressure could sure stand to hear an example of the 'good' right about now - lol - any examples?

Judas

... it's hard to find examples, as the only things we see in the media and available over the net usually is all the bads.. none of the goods.... just take into consideration that if you haven't heard anything bad about the free trade on any specific day, then apparently that day went well.

__________________

temeteus82

Free trade = US will lift embargo against Cuba

__________________
How you can help DriverHeaven by using Digg!

Maddogg6

hehe - the ol 'no news is good news' position.... I wonder if thats what got us here? - I keep trying to see the benefit *I* get from free trade with china.
PC componants maybe a little cheaper now - but at the cost of 8000 people loosing a beloved pet from poisoned food thats just whats been investigated, I have little doubt theres been other older pets that the owners just assumed were 'natural cause' - or could not afford to have an autopsy done on their pet.
And now (potentially, but its looking like a 'most likely') tooth paste.

Is saving a few extra bucks on a mobo and ram - worth it?

That wont happen till gitmo is closed/abandoned. - so, prolly never.

OmegaRED

Not a subject I'm well versed in but Free Trade has been bad for Canada so I'll infer the effects of free trade benefit countries with stronger economic and political power or countries with cheap labour.

__________________

Zelig

Other than the softwood lumber mess, how has NAFTA, in general, been bad for Canada?

__________________
--

OmegaRED

I don't specifically but the general feeling in Canada is that we get the short end of the stick in any trade agreements with The USA or Mexico. Aside from the lumber issue I believe fishing is also a large problem but I can't say I keep tabs on this sort of stuff (as the trade problems are east coast or west coast, I'm neither).

__________________

Yousaif

A question was asked earlier: Is Free Trade good? Not *can* it be good, but is it good?

My answer to that question is that as soon as I see real free trade happen, I will be able to make a judgement on it. I would be more inclined to say the Fair Trade is a good thing, but even that is rare.

It could be a good thing, like if countries remove the import duties on American produce and other goods and make sure that they get inspected and moved through customs in a timely fashion. But, that said, there is protectionism going on in every corner of the world.

The EU puts tarriffs on goods that are produced outside of the EU to protect their own industries. Apparently the US is trying its best to protect lumber harvesting. Japan puts tarriffs on goods that come in from outside, all in the name of getting people to buy their own products.

I used to be a major free trade advocate. This would mean no tarriffs anywhere and letting the manufacturers compete for the sale. Unfortunately the markets aren't the same everywhere. Wages are different in different countries, which changes the cost of manufacturing a good. This gives third world and developing nations an edge when it comes to selling their goods.

Nowadays I am leaning a bit more towards a protectionist standpoint. I don't find it fair that countries put giant-sized tarriffs on the goods that my counrty produces then scream about it when we put the same tarriffs on theirs. I don't find it fair that my country is bleeding cash at an uproarious rate while countries that send their goods here are sucking it all up.

I know that no one said that life is fair, but that's actually one of the words that are used when we make trade agreements. "Fair Trade."

__________________
-----------------------------
Yousaif


Isaiah 1:23