Pentagon 911 video

OnDborder · May 16, 2006, 04:40 PM

Boy, from what I can see in those videos, that "plane" isn't very big.
In the first video, you can barely make out a nose cone, a very thin nose cone. You would think it would be a lot larger.
Judge for yourself.
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/index.html

SexPistoL · May 16, 2006, 04:58 PM

Sorry m8, but.............Not this again !!!!!!! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Falstaff · May 16, 2006, 05:12 PM

ditto....ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz

Nacht · May 16, 2006, 09:24 PM

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

I was going to dig up the old thread, and post this link there...but this will work just as well.

Trodas, read up

Zelig · May 16, 2006, 09:26 PM

It's not actually trodas who started the thread.

Nacht · May 16, 2006, 09:57 PM

I know, but I figured the thread title would attract him here. I was simply calling his attention to the link

TJ- · May 16, 2006, 10:10 PM

someone post the video, i cant find it.,

Nacht · May 16, 2006, 10:17 PM

http://www.judicialwatch.org/

OnDborder · May 17, 2006, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [Di]:Z!ON

someone post the video, i cant find it.,

It's down the page. 2 videos. http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/index.html

Sorry, I wasn't here during the last debate over this subject, neither were these videos.

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 07:22 AM

That is SOOO not a boeing...

bug77 · May 17, 2006, 07:57 AM

Never ceases to amaze me how people expect a plane to make a hole the size of it's own wingspan... That's not proof, that's cartoons!

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 08:20 AM

No what surprises me is the size of the plane... And I do expect to see damage from the wings... Why the hell would there be a hole to the size of the wingspan? I just want the impact marks... And debris while we are at it!

And is that the supposed boeing? Wtf? (yeah that tiny white thing...)

BWX · May 17, 2006, 08:27 AM

And the moon landing never happened.

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 08:32 AM

It did... Dude I totally believe 911 happened! Why do you all think that if you disagree with the goverment facts for 911 that I assume it never happened? It did but the pentagon story and all just doesn't add up.

Thank god some people actually are nosy and look in every nook and cranny. If everyone believed whatever the officals told us, we'd still be pumping Radium into our blood...

BWX · May 17, 2006, 08:43 AM

I still know that a plane hit the pentagon... all the people died, it is a tragedy.. the end.

No missile, no bomb, no conspiracy, except that of the terrorists who took advantage of out free society to kill us.

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 08:45 AM

Meh is all I can say mate... Till they release the videos from the Sharaton hotel and gas station right next to the pentagon which have full 25fps cams AND that all the eye witnesses agree on what they saw (since one saw a missile, another a small plane and another a boeing), I shall stay sceptical.

And you are just like my dad

BWX · May 17, 2006, 08:59 AM

Your dad must be a very smart and handsome man.

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 09:03 AM

He is BWX

Hey honestly I don't find it fun either and I do hope that the world never faces another even like the 7/7 or 911

BWX · May 17, 2006, 09:19 AM

The sad thing is, I am pretty sure there will be worse attacks on free countries... from terrorists. Just a hunch.. but I would bet in the next 10 years someone will set off a nuke somewhere.. or something else like a biological or chemical attack..

Just a matter of time..

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 09:20 AM

WW3 is a coming... Fast

BWX · May 17, 2006, 09:21 AM

-if not already here.

Sandok · May 17, 2006, 09:28 AM

Well it's a hidden war but the moment it becomes full scale, that'll be a scary time.

Nacht · May 17, 2006, 08:44 PM

Sandok, go to the first link I posted. It was def. a 757.

One of my pledge brothers at Uni saw it himself.

OnDborder · May 19, 2006, 11:58 AM

Ok, it was American Airlines 77. It was an airline.. A very big, cumbersome aircraft. Takes years of experience to even begin to handle one of these marvels of engineering... Right?

Are we suppose to believe someone, hani hanjour( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hani_Hanjour) , flew and controlled this aircraft "feet" above the ground for hundreds of yards before slamming into the Pentagon.
Ok, let's just take a few clippings out of this article..
"Leaving Oakland in September and moving to [color=#0000ff]Phoenix, Arizona[/color], Hanjour paid $4,800 for lessons at CRM Flight Cockpit Resource Management in [color=#0000ff]Scottsdale[/color]. He received poor marks from instructor Duncan Hastie"
"In [color=#0000ff]August[/color] [color=#0000ff]1998[/color], Hanjour requested to rent a small plane at the [color=#0000ff]Freeway Airport[/color] in [color=#0000ff]Bowie, Maryland[/color]. However, after three practise flights with an overseer, it was decided that he was not capable enough to allow him to rent"
"Hanjour failed UA English classes with a 0.26 GPA and a JetTech manager said “He could not fly at all.”"

"[Flight Academy] Staff members characterized Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet. But most of all, the former employee said, they considered him a very bad pilot. "I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon," the former employee said. "He could not fly at all." [[color=#0000ff]New York Times[/color]]"
"they found he had trouble controlling and landing the single-engine Cessna 172"
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hanjour.html

This, in my opinion, is what really smells of caca de toro.. How could someone that couldn't even handle a Cesna, handle that 757??

One other "oddity".. Wouldn't you assume/think that the Pentagon would have slightly more security cameras than a neighborhood Walmart? We get to see video from a guard station?
I am not a conspiracy nut

Just someone that is asking questions.

Sandok · May 19, 2006, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nacht

Sandok, go to the first link I posted. It was def. a 757.

One of my pledge brothers at Uni saw it himself.

Seen plenty of sites giving better proof than your link that it wasn't a 757 and a friend of ours, who was at the scene when it happened swears that it wasn't a commercial 757... And I'd rather believe sombody I know and not some "pledge" bro!

Actually, no two eyewitness agree so...

Anyways, I'm outta this thread, no need for more flaming on my part.

OnDborder · May 19, 2006, 12:30 PM

Just what if it was??
Don't you find it odd that this guy could fly this plane?
Here's another obsticle this "terrorist" had to overcome with his vast skill and knowledge.. "In fact, the real difficulty may be how the airplane managed to maintain this continuous downward flight path. If the pilot was trying hard to push the airplane down as close to the ground as possible, the craft would have encountered "ground effect", an increase of lift and decrease of drag experienced by low-wing aircraft operating a few feet above the terrain. This effect can make it very difficult to land an airplane until all excess speed has been "bled off". "
http://www.911-strike.com/quantum-path.htm

This Pentagon event is overlooked by the visuals of the Twin Towers..

NUCLEARWINTER · May 20, 2006, 02:03 AM

.....i h8 terrorists....they suk! there ought to be a shirt that says "Terrorists Are Gay" or "T.A.G" for short