|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Dec 4, 2002, 07:54 PM
|
#1 |
|
E Pluribus Unum
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,203
Rep Power: 0
|
P4 @ 3.5GHz (AIRCOOLED!)
http://www.thecrucible.ca/reviews/DoGMaN.htm
Did I neglect to mention that this dude is in Canada and the ambient temperature was -10C? |
|
|
|
Dec 4, 2002, 08:03 PM
|
#2 |
|
Frikkin COmputer~!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kaysville, Utah
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 0
|
The extremes intel fans go too.......
 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 4, 2002, 09:04 PM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0
|
Intel....BAH! It's just great because an AMD CPU running at what....300 mhz less is actually equivalent to an Intel CPU.....Crazy. Oh and yeah...it costs less.... Intel 3.06 ghz 768$ at pricewatch.com
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 4, 2002, 10:17 PM
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 0
|
So many jealous/envious people...
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 4, 2002, 10:50 PM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0
|
Man, when I realized my Thunderbird 1.3 overclocked to 1.4 is equivalent to a P4 1.7 or 1.8, man, I smiled.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2002, 11:41 AM
|
#7 |
|
Painlord of Ichor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bloinkin!
Posts: 1,610
Rep Power: 0
|
dfg
Then you smiled realizing when that cruddy old processor was originally introduced it cose just as much as a 1.7ghz...right?
Or did you smile when you also realized that Sandra scores really don't mean crap for performance comparisons? Whatever, you'll never see an AMD hit 3.5ghz on air...hah, probably never even reach 3ghz. If a 3.06Ghz P4 is faster than a 2.26Ghz Athlon...who the hell cares about clock difference? Athlon can't scale to the speeds it needs to compete! ARGH! Yeah, it's cheaper...BUT SLOWER! DO YOU NOT SEE THE FUTILITY OF THESE ARGUMENTS? ARGH! |
|
|
|
