|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Nov 16, 2004, 10:41 AM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seoul-Tokyo Connection
Posts: 235
Rep Power: 0
|
need help with DDR timing
i have a P4 2.8ghz 533FSB northwood and i overclocked it to 3ghz, but i don't know what to do with the DDR Timings, does tinkering with this help? my timings are 2-3-3-6, what's the best configuration for me? pls help coz im kinda new to overclocking, thanks
|
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2004, 01:05 PM
|
#2 |
|
Caffeine Machine
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hell is empty. All the devils are here.
Posts: 670
Rep Power: 0
|
You're already running at CAS2, so there's not much room for improvement. if the system is running stable, I wouldn't mess with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19, 2004, 12:39 PM
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 0
|
Hi!
You could set your ram timings for 2-2-2-5 1T. Perhaps your board supports CAS 1.5, then you could try that, but thats the top. Brisko007 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 19, 2004, 06:41 PM
|
#4 |
|
I Have lovely Breasts
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the closet...
Posts: 5,397
Rep Power: 39
|
i wouldnt mess with it. its a bad idea. besides, higher FSB ALWAYS is better than lower latencies.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2004, 09:22 AM
|
#5 | |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seoul-Tokyo Connection
Posts: 235
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2004, 12:59 PM
|
#6 |
|
I Have lovely Breasts
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the closet...
Posts: 5,397
Rep Power: 39
|
1T is better than 2T.
1.5 CAS is better than 2 CAS. let it be known that 1.5 CAS is nearly unheard of. In fact, I have NEVER met anyone who has ran their RAM stabally that way. And no RAM makers sell their ram at those latencies...so I wouldnt hold your breath for that. |
|
|
|
