|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Dec 4, 2007, 01:17 PM
|
#1591
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
|
my friend got a few HyperX PC2 9600 (DDR2-1200) kits, they're direct import from oversea since it first out, right now it's available everywhere and it's very cheaper than before.
he kills a lot of D9's based RAM himself, i'm talking about 20 kits or more, but he is loving the HyperX a lot and and carefully use them, lol.
all of the kits he is having can run DDR-1150MHz CAS4-4-4 @ 2.3V on Gigabyte P35 and and DFI P965P boards, which is very good at this voltage use.
G.Skill GA DDR2-800 CAS3 2.2-2.4V 2x1GB kit can also run something similar to the HyperX DDR2-1200,
but it also seems not available anymore.
i don't know about the rest of DDR2's, but then again, all of them are a lot of hit and miss.
|
|
|
Dec 5, 2007, 09:19 AM
|
#1592
|
|
Stingy and Stubborn
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,322
Rep Power: 0
|
Wanted to get in the competition, but I've been wondering...
What's the difference between Intel Pro and Intel Super Modified? Any place I can find a description of the different categories? Thanks
|
|
|
Dec 8, 2007, 12:45 AM
|
#1593
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LHC
Wanted to get in the competition, but I've been wondering...
What's the difference between Intel Pro and Intel Super Modified? Any place I can find a description of the different categories? Thanks
|
Sorry for the delay on seeing this....
It would seem the page giving the official rules is down.
Basically
Intel Pro - Aircooling only, no volt mods or other crazy mods done, and OCing.
Intel Super Modified - Go wild with anything you can get to obtain the highest score. Volt mods, LN2/Phase/Water/Air Cooling, basically anything goes.
Also they are broken down between CF/SLI and Single GFX.
cheers
|
|
|
Dec 8, 2007, 05:05 PM
|
#1594
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
|
|
|
Feb 14, 2008, 10:32 AM
|
#1595
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denmark, CPH.
Posts: 587
Rep Power: 0
|
Am i the only one thinking water cooling isnt "super modified"? especially these days where cpus oc just as well on good air, as on water...
|
|
|
Feb 14, 2008, 11:45 AM
|
#1596
|
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 3,582
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsdsdk
Am i the only one thinking water cooling isnt "super modified"? especially these days where cpus oc just as well on good air, as on water...
|
agreed. I've always used watercooling on mid-range gear so I really can never compete
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2008, 05:37 AM
|
#1597
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denmark, CPH.
Posts: 587
Rep Power: 0
|
maybe I should get a cpu-heatsink/fan, bench, upload score and go back to watercooling (it's more quiet)... ok, maybe my E8500 will run 100mhz less, but hey, i'm in a lower catagory..
wouldnt it be easier if watercooling wasnt condisered "super modified" or "the extreme edge of entusiast oc"?
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2008, 02:15 PM
|
#1598
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsdsdk
maybe I should get a cpu-heatsink/fan, bench, upload score and go back to watercooling (it's more quiet)... ok, maybe my E8500 will run 100mhz less, but hey, i'm in a lower catagory..
wouldnt it be easier if watercooling wasnt condisered "super modified" or "the extreme edge of entusiast oc"?
|
The only reason your PCmark05 score is low is because your in XP.... it does much better on Vista because of the 3d accelerated windows, so your transparent windows test sky rockets. Also 3870s run better in Vista then they do in XP from my own experience.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2008, 01:38 AM
|
#1599
|
|
S-3D enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,497
|
I'm having trouble with pcmark05. Many tests fail. Here's the list of failing tests :
HDD - XP Startup
Web Page Rendering
HDD - General Usage
Text Edit
Image Decompression
File Compression
File Encryption
HDD - Virus Scan
Memory Latency - Random 16 MB
My system specs are under my name. I thought maybe it had to do with Windows Vista but it works for Judas so that's not the problem. Maybe this has been mentionned before in the thread but I haven't read it all.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2008, 01:41 AM
|
#1600
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tril
I'm having trouble with pcmark05. Many tests fail. Here's the list of failing tests :
HDD - XP Startup
Web Page Rendering
HDD - General Usage
Text Edit
Image Decompression
File Compression
File Encryption
HDD - Virus Scan
Memory Latency - Random 16 MB
My system specs are under my name. I thought maybe it had to do with Windows Vista but it works for Judas so that's not the problem. Maybe this has been mentionned before in the thread but I haven't read it all.
|
What kind overclock you running?
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2008, 02:29 AM
|
#1601
|
|
S-3D enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,497
|
I'm running stock clocks on the cpu and the ram.
EDIT : I found a solution to my problem. I need to right click the link to the program and click "Run as administrator".
EDIT 2 : I'm giving up taking part in Roadee's Fastest Rig Competition (for now). I'm having overheating problems when overclocking. When I installed my cpu cooler (Zalman CNPS8000), I noticed that it touched one heatsink of my motherboard (ASUS P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP) slightly. Because of that, I was not sure if the cpu cooler was laying flat against the cpu. I gave it a try anyway and the computer ran fine at stock clocks. Now, when overclocking the cpu temps of the two cores climb very fast, very high so it looks like the heatsink is probably not perfectly flat against the cpu. I won't be able to overclock until I swap the cpu cooler with the stock Intel cooler (or another cpu cooler) and I don't think I'll do it for now (feeling too lazy today  ).
So my advice to anyone reading this : I don't recommend using a Zalman CNPS8000 with a ASUS P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP.
Last edited by Tril; Mar 10, 2008 at 07:11 PM.
|
|
|
Apr 15, 2008, 01:47 AM
|
#1602
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,428
Rep Power: 0
|
Anybody know why it's been three weeks and blitzen still doesn't have any award?
|
|
|
Apr 15, 2008, 02:04 AM
|
#1603
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son_of_Thunder
Anybody know why it's been three weeks and blitzen still doesn't have any award?
|
Allow Me to express my deepest apologies!
I have fixed his entry, and he has been awarded the Avatar
Between the broken Radiator that I had (got a crack in the welding around the inlet/outlet valves of the radiator) and the crappy couple of X3350 (45nm Q9450 equivalents) I havent been doing as much as I should.
I am back to business though 
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 11:26 AM
|
#1604
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX
Allow Me to express my deepest apologies!
I have fixed his entry, and he has been awarded the Avatar
Between the broken Radiator that I had (got a crack in the welding around the inlet/outlet valves of the radiator) and the crappy couple of X3350 (45nm Q9450 equivalents) I havent been doing as much as I should.
I am back to business though 
|
 woot, thanks for the title. unfortunately that thing is about as clocked out as it can get so if anybody tries to take it from me i can't defend lol.
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 01:05 PM
|
#1605
|
|
Resisting i7 Temptations
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzen
 woot, thanks for the title. unfortunately that thing is about as clocked out as it can get so if anybody tries to take it from me i can't defend lol.
|
Ahhh the downfalls of Phenom 
|
|
|
Apr 16, 2008, 04:50 PM
|
#1606
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0
|
i'm happy with the results i pulled out of that phenom. i raised it by 0.3GHz and it's a quad core. best yet is that it cost me considerably less than any intel that can keep up (unfotunatly there is a lot of intel CPUs that smoke it really bad)
|
|
|
May 6, 2008, 06:32 PM
|
#1607
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0
|
i want to clarify something with the intel stock single category, can I use a wolfdale and a dx10? the rules says E6600 at most. and dx9 cards only? Are the rules updated?
|
|
|
May 6, 2008, 06:49 PM
|
#1608
|
|
Like a Fish
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 19,785
|
probably so. rules haven't been updated in a while. they were updated shortly after the e6xx0 and q6xx0 CPUs were released.
|
|
|
|
|
|