• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Hardware and Related Topics > Overclocking and Modding

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Aug 10, 2003, 10:54 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
craig588 is on a distinguished road

I just added a 92MM fan and got the same speeds as I had when watercooling

I just added a 92mm fan on the side of my HS, not the top. (This is the same HS and 92MM fan that I bought from Dom, thanks) I raised the voltage to 1.85 (1.87 effective) Now the system is running perfectly stable at 134MHz FSB and the cpu is back up to 2288MHz. I think I might even be able to take it higher because With my watercooling the temps were about the same, but now the volts are higher. I'm using a 60 to 80mm converter with 3 80MM 115CFM fans attached to each other connected to the top of the HS. Air cooling is so much more fun that water because of all of the different options.

Too bad my video card can only hit 365MHz with crystal orbs on both the front and the back of it.
craig588 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Aug 10, 2003, 11:03 PM   #2
confutatis maledictis
 
Vampyromaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
Rep Power: 0
Vampyromaniac is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Re: I just added a 92MM fan and got the same speeds as I had when watercooling

Quote:
Originally posted by craig588
I just added a 92mm fan on the side of my HS, not the top . . . I'm using a 60 to 80mm converter with 3 80MM 115CFM fans attached to each other connected to the top of the HS.
Can you draw a picture of that? (I know ya don't have a cam )
Vampyromaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2003, 11:21 PM   #3
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
brazilian is on a distinguished road

try 12.5 (20) x 133... I think you won't reach that without a7v vcore mod. but it's worth a try...., anyway, 9.5 (18) x 133 will be much better for your config, so go for it
brazilian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2003, 11:30 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
craig588 is on a distinguished road

I have no hosting, so would would have to contact me on AIM/MSN for the drawing.

AIM: craig5888 (not a typo)
MSN: craig588 (at) hotmail (dot) com


I'm a big fan of the FSB, I don't like multipliers, and I have no idea why. Ill work on increasing the FSB for now.

EDIT: I just tried running it at 136MHz and its completely stable, I bet I can still go higher.

Last edited by craig588; Aug 10, 2003 at 11:47 PM.
craig588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2003, 11:56 PM   #5
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
brazilian is on a distinguished road

Do you even see the difference about 130 to 140? =-o

I'd love go to 133x18 =-)
brazilian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2003, 12:16 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
craig588 is on a distinguished road

I can really tell the difference in FSB speed, even if the chips are the same speed.

EDIT: the highest I can get this thing up to is 138MHz FSB. The chips at 2345MHz or ~3000+ (!!) I really do love this chip, it has so much potential.

Last edited by craig588; Aug 11, 2003 at 12:50 AM.
craig588 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net