|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Aug 7, 2003, 04:20 PM
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
OH MY GOD I LOVE THIS CHIP!!!!! (caps)
Thanks to brazilian I finnaly got my 2100+ AIUHB 1.5V chip working on this mobo. I brought the voltage up to 1.65 and its now clocked at 2125MHz! Its only at 39C under load! This is my first boot up with it and its at 125MHz FSB. It doesn't boot at 133MHz, or 130, but I think the MHz gained in the chip will make up for my lower FSB speed. (Right?) I think I'm gonna try raising the FSB a little higher, then I'll work on the multiplier.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 04:33 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
|
Awesome, now it's time to change your signature ;-)
I told ya it wouldn't be hard.
Stick with the same fsb you are, and only change the ram fsb (async.) and you will be just fine.
cheers
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 04:58 PM
|
#3
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 30,032
|
congratulations !!! and yes those chips rock craig ! keep us posted on performance and findings 
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 05:05 PM
|
#4
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
I just did a quick job for a customer and then I went back to work on this system. My FSB is at 128MHz now. The chips at 2176MHz now.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 05:08 PM
|
#5
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 30,032
|
if you get time, run a pcmark2002 bench, id be curious to see the results........
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 05:31 PM
|
#6
|
|
VETUS INFLATIO
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Red Lodge UK
Posts: 16,153
|
Another vote for Althon
I should have bought one.....sigh
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 05:40 PM
|
#7
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
Wow, this crucial ram is so nice. I dropped the FSB down to 120 so I could use the special ram devider and now the ram is running at 160MHz. The mobo can't go any higher. I think this is how I'll keep it. The chips at 2160MHz now (I raised the multiplier a bit more)
I started getting artifacting in UT2k3. The highest I can take it without artifacting is 157MHz, and the FSB is at 118MHz.
Last edited by craig588; Aug 7, 2003 at 05:59 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:21 PM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
|
no problem... actually good job. Crucial ones is a very good buy for pc133's / pc150's.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:21 PM
|
#9
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 30,032
|
is the performance good?
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:30 PM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
|
Performance on my computer is just amazing... I don't even think getting new mobo+ram before 64bit architeture.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:44 PM
|
#11
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
I tested it at various settings and the fastest/ most stable is at 127MHz FSB. Its pretty nice.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:54 PM
|
#12
|
|
F*&k The Police
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, US
Posts: 2,103
Rep Power: 0
|
sweet..
happy for ya man, your probably jumping out of your seat from excitement, hehe.. gaming is probably better now too.
RUN SOME BENCHIES 
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 06:59 PM
|
#13
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
I got 6003 CPU marks in PCmark. I'll try 3dmark2001 next. I can't run 2003 on my system for some reason.
EDIT: Hmm, I only got 12500~ 3dmarks in 2001. The omega drivers are kinda killing my benching performance, but I play games more than I bench.
EDIT2: Compare link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6855730
Last edited by craig588; Aug 7, 2003 at 07:14 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 7, 2003, 07:38 PM
|
#14
|
|
Courage68
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: My Bed ZzZzz
Posts: 132
Rep Power: 0
|
good job happy u love the proformance on it  good to see a nother amd athlon rightfully overclocked to its true power 
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 01:35 AM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hungary
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 0
|
that chip could easily run around 200mhz fsb
i think u should change board if u really want a perf increase
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 02:44 AM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
Rep Power: 0
|
with your hardware and components that is a very top notch outstanding! job man!! nice OC there craig 
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 04:30 AM
|
#17
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
can i ask, perhaps i missed the thread....how did Brazzilian help???
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 08:06 AM
|
#18
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
He helped me in ICQ. This board is crap and cant support Tbreds normally. He showed me some special settings that will let me boot it. The only problem is everything is a little odd in the bios now. It will only boot at a 9x multiplier, but because of the problems with the board the 9x multiplier gets converted into a 17X multiplier so thats the lowest I can go. (I can also use 12.5 which translates into a 20X multiplier) The board doesn't have any sort of devider after 120MHz so I'm stuck with the ram at a slow speed, but if I bring the FSB below 120 the performance is hit to greatly for the extra performance the ram devider could bring by bringing it up to 157MHz.
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 09:43 AM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
i see, so you actually forced the board to support the chip??
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 09:47 AM
|
#20
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
Yeah, and on another note....
I just got it to boot and run UT2k3 for about a half hour (Then I quit, it didn't crash) at 133MHz FSB. Both wcpuid and cpuz say that the bus is at 134MHz though, and the chip is now running at 2283MHz. I lowered the mobo I/O voltage to 3.45 (I used to be at 3.55 for the old 148MHz fsb I had) and I raised to CPU voltage to 1.75.
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 09:56 AM
|
#21
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
 wow~ congrates man........nice OC there, i wish my mobo would just be like yours.......the Agp/pci frequency arent locked at higher fsb's.....too bad....perhaps you can help????
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 10:04 AM
|
#22
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
Mine arn't locked either, thats why I needed to raised the I/O voltage.
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 10:10 AM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
I/O voltage??? awww....i dont think i have that option.....what a crappy mobo~  any other way?? i'm using P4S8X-X.......
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 10:23 AM
|
#24
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
You might want to ask Intel guys because I only know about AMD mobos and old Intels. (PIII and below)
Heres my newest 3dmark score at ~13000
compare link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6857980
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 10:33 AM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
Awesome man! congrates to you again~LOL;lol: 
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 11:35 AM
|
#26
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brazil - Sâo Paulo
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 0
|
Humn... interesting craig..... for a lot of ppl the I/O didn't help at all... but watch out, if you download a program called memtest86, you will see that will be more stable and with a lot less errors if you stick with I/O 3.3.
I even know a guy which don't have a jumper on it, and it's running just fine
Since u got watercooler system, did you tried the 9.5x? It will be converted to 18.
Maybe you will need to raise vcore.
this table translate the multipliers on the board, but not all settings will work:
15 7
16 8
16.5 8.5
17 9
18 9.5
19 11.5
20 12.5
22 7.5
23 10
24 10.5
btw, still can't get the www.oslama.kit.net/bios/bios.zip ?
Last edited by brazilian; Aug 8, 2003 at 11:41 AM.
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:12 PM
|
#27
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
Nope, I still can't get it.
EDIT: I just got 6342 PC marks in PCmark2002 with my new configuration.
EDIT2: For some reason I can now run 3dmark2k3. I got 5253 marks. Pretty cool.
EDIT3: I needed to lower my I/O voltage once more for stability in MOH, but I don't think it should matter when I'm only at 134MHz FSB.
Last edited by craig588; Aug 8, 2003 at 06:24 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 8, 2003, 08:35 PM
|
#28
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Maxxypoos
the Agp/pci frequency arent locked at higher fsb's.....too bad....perhaps you can help????
|
guys, will raising the AP voltage help????? or is there any other names for I/O voltage???
|
|
 | |