|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Apr 17, 2008, 01:57 PM
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
 |
Q9300 (333x7.5) @ 400x7.5 1.1125V (BIOS)
 444x7.5 1.2125V (BIOS), MCH +0.15V 
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 04:25 PM
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Quote:
however, as i've been seeing on the web that some thinks there will be some issues with Intel 45-nm chips degradation when using voltages too high, some just don't seem to really care at all (well, it's your money, it's your call). on my Q9300, as you can see, i can get quite a bit higher FSB, but right now i don't want to try this FSB with the default CPU multi, since the CPU will most likely need quite a bit of more volts, and i'm still using the stock cooler. 466 CPU FSB.  472 CPU FSB, FSB +0.15V MCH +0.30V. 
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) Last edited by PangingJr; Apr 17, 2008 at 04:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 05:39 PM
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
|
Hey ChaosMinionX, thanks for all the details. I'm gona try them out asap.
BTW, I had already tried flashing the bios to 0612 but I keep getting the error message: Rom size doesn't match existing bios size. But I'll find a fix for that.
__________________
- |
|
|
|
|
Apr 17, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
4870X2 Anyone??
|
@Pang - The X38/48 and P35 all have significant problems clocking the 45nm chips.... its a BIOS issue, the Asus Engineers are working on it as of today, a guy called them and spoke with the BIOS Engineers concerning this, a fix should be out by next week.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008, 04:32 AM
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008, 10:21 AM
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Q9300's and Q9450's Core temp.
 Q9300 Temps AnandTech - Q9300 Temps Q9300 voltage and temp question Q9300 voltage and temp question - Guru3D.com Forums Q9300 Retail BOX, am i reading my temps right? Q9300 Retail BOX, am i reading my temps right? - XtremeSystems Forums Q9450 - Stock speeds - Core Temps OK? Q9450 - Stock speeds - Core Temps OK? - [H]ard|Forum X3350 (Q9450) Core Temps? X3350 (Q9450) Core Temps? Q9450 - High Idle Temperature Q9450 - High Idle Temperature - Page 2 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
Apr 21, 2008, 12:40 PM
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Q9300 450x7.5
 BIOS settings... 
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
Apr 21, 2008, 03:27 PM
|
#54 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
wonder if this is the current WR on all the Yorkfield's
QX9775 LGA771 Yorkfield @ 6GHz Quote:
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 21, 2008, 03:35 PM
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 3,383
|
Pretty sure it was unless someone else was able to break it in the past 5 days since the results were posted.
__________________
essentials: Intel E8400 - eVGA 780i - Galaxy 8800GT SLI - 4GB Patriot Viper PC2-8500 storage: (3) WD6400AAKS - Dell Perc5/i RAID5 case & power: Tagan Black Pearl [under construction] - Gigabyte Odin GT - Silverstone CMD01-ESA cooling: DTEK Fuzion - (2) Swiftech MCW60 - Swiftech MCP355 w/ EK X-150 - Koolance Compression Fittings - Feser One Tubing |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22, 2008, 02:32 AM
|
#56 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Quote:
------------------------------------ my Q9300 @ 462x7.5 lol    BIOS settings... 
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) Last edited by PangingJr; Apr 22, 2008 at 04:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 23, 2008, 09:57 PM
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Q9300 @ 444x7.5
 BIOS settings (MCH, PCIe, FSB and DIMM at default volts)... 
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2008, 01:02 PM
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Everest Benchmark of Q9300 vs QX6700 (at the default clock frequency multipliers)
Intel Core 2 Quad Processor Q9300 (Yorkfield, 45-nm, 6MB L2 Cache, M1) 2.50GHz (333 x 7.5) Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9300 - SLAWE Intel Core 2 Extreme Processor QX6700 (Kentsfield, 65-nm, 8MB L2 Cache, B3) 2.66GHz (266 x 10) Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX6700 - SL9UL Except for the Memory Latency test, the higher score means the better performance.           
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) Last edited by PangingJr; May 1, 2008 at 01:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2008, 01:16 PM
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
my Q9300 is with DDR2, DRAM : FSB = 1.60 : 1 (or Memory Multiplier 3.20x CPU FSB 333), the DDR2 memory timing was no tweak.
 the QX6700 is also using a P35 board, but it's DDR3, DRAM : FSB = 2.00 : 1 (or Memory Multiplier 4.00x CPU FSB 266). If i run the Q9300 with DDR3 and use the same 2.00 : 1 (or Memory Multiplier 4.00x CPU FSB 333), then the memory would run at DDR3-1333, and i should get a better results (all around). However, these benchmarks are synthetic, ie. the results show only the theoretical (maximum) performance of the system. In contrast to application tests, synthetic benchmarks do not tend to reflect the "real world" performance of the computer. the benchmarks provide quick and easy comparison between computer states, e.g. when certain parameters (CPU clock speed, memory timings, etc) change in system configuration.
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
May 3, 2008, 04:02 PM
|
#60 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,771
|
Quote:
can i see some everest's results?
__________________
Q9300 @ 500FSB Q9300 @ 3.60GHz 4x1GB DDR2-1333 (PC2-10666) ------------------------------------------------- Don't worry overly much about whether a specific KB article exists for your version of Windows. Standard practice is to grab whatever's available and apply the principles. (I grabbed from the web. Written by someone, somewhere on the web) |
|
|
|
|
