NVIDIA & ATI GTK BenchmarksNVIDIA & ATI GTK Benchmarks @ Phoronix

Vikingod · Jul 31, 2007, 09:12 AM

Source: Phoronix
_____________
Since publishing our Avivo versus fglrx driver GtkPerf benchmarks that compared the GTK performance between the community open-source driver and ATI's official driver, we have received a number of requests for more of these 2D benchmarks with different graphics cards and different drivers. While this is not one of our formal articles, we have completed a few more GtkPerf tests with NVIDIA and ATI graphics cards to see how the GTK performance stacks up.

bug77 · Jul 31, 2007, 09:26 AM

Damn, now open source nvidia drivers are faster than the official ones?

caqde · Jul 31, 2007, 01:31 PM

Read the graphs carefully that is in seconds not fps..

Nvidia official are faster although we can't say the same for ATI's which seem to be about the same for the official and the open-source one's..

bug77 · Aug 1, 2007, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caqde

Read the graphs carefully that is in seconds not fps..

Nvidia official are faster although we can't say the same for ATI's which seem to be about the same for the official and the open-source one's..

Stupid me (*bangs head against wall*). Ok, so nvidia is still the Linux choice. Cool.

Jul 31, 2007, 09:12 AM	#1
Vikingod Int'l Fish Liaison Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type... Posts: 16,149 Rep Power: 85 System Specs	NVIDIA & ATI GTK BenchmarksNVIDIA & ATI GTK Benchmarks @ Phoronix Source: Phoronix _____________ Since publishing our Avivo versus fglrx driver GtkPerf benchmarks that compared the GTK performance between the community open-source driver and ATI's official driver, we have received a number of requests for more of these 2D benchmarks with different graphics cards and different drivers. While this is not one of our formal articles, we have completed a few more GtkPerf tests with NVIDIA and ATI graphics cards to see how the GTK performance stacks up. __________________ *How You Can Help DriverHeaven By Using Digg*

Jul 31, 2007, 01:31 PM	#3
caqde DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 437 Rep Power: 45	Read the graphs carefully that is in seconds not fps.. Nvidia official are faster although we can't say the same for ATI's which seem to be about the same for the official and the open-source one's.. __________________ AMD Phenom II X4 925 AM3/ Giga-byte MA790XT-UD4P XFX HD5770 1GB / 2x2GB of GSKILL DDR3 10666 8-8-8-23 Samsung SH-S182D DVD-RW drive / Samsung SH-S222A DVD-RW drive Western Digital 7500AACS(Primary)/Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320gb(Secondary)/Western Digital 3200KS 16MB 7200rpm SATAII HD(Secondary) Fortron AX500-A PSU / CoolerMaster CMStacker Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum EX / Creative Inspire 6600 6.1 speakers Samsuugn T200HD 20" LCD Monitor / Logitech Internet 350 Black Keyboard Logitech MX510 Mouse

Jul 31, 2007, 09:26 AM	#2
bug77 DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: around Posts: 792 Rep Power: 0	Damn, now open source nvidia drivers are faster than the official ones?