|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jun 27, 2004, 04:16 PM
|
#1
|
|
Elite Motherf#$%er
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,833
|
Record for Nude Photo Shoot Broken
With 2,754 people disrobing on a chilly day in Cleveland, Ohio, artist Spencer Tunick broke the North American record for the number of people nude in a photo shoot. The previous record for the continent was 2,500 in Tunick's Montreal photo shoot.
This new record does not come close to the international record Tunick set when 7,000 people disrobed last year for his shoot in Barcelona, Spain. This time Tunick separated the groups by male and female. He took photos near a museum and stadium.
Art teacher Michael Costello, 54, said: I'm surprised to see so many people from other cities; I met three women from Tennessee. I guess it's like the Grateful Dead has Deadheads. This guy has Buttheads, I'd guess you call them."
--- 5,000th thread
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 04:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Everyones life has worth
Join Date: May 2003
Location: My Yellow Bug
Posts: 3,778
|
Glad to see you're keeping us up to date on nationwide news lol
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 05:58 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norway, Oslo
Posts: 72
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
Driverheaven brewmaster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,835
|
I seen that on the news as well...whole lotta saggy skin there!
At least in the shots that I seen.
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Elite Motherf#$%er
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,833
|
Hey Perfect, your sig is too big... max size is 400x100 
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:39 PM
|
#6
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,626
|
i just noticed that aswell mythical
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:41 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norway, Oslo
Posts: 72
|
I scaled it down to 450x100. Is that okey?
It would just look plain ugly any smaller. And if i were to customize it for just 50 pixels it will be an hour or so of work :/.
I hope its ok. Im not out to be lame or something.
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:42 PM
|
#8
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,626
|
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:47 PM
|
#9
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
BAM
400x100
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:56 PM
|
#10
|
|
Elite Motherf#$%er
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,833
|
He might not want the sides cropped... go into Photoshop or something and just change to 400x100... Make sure it's not a gigantic file size also 
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 06:59 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norway, Oslo
Posts: 72
|
As i said. It will look crappy :/...
I mean. It would understand if it was to high. But if its just 50 pixel wider. Thats like 3kb. :/
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 07:07 PM
|
#12
|
|
Elite Motherf#$%er
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,833
|
Well... unless you somehow get Zardon to give you that size you have to use 400x100 
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2004, 07:23 PM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Guys, it is not your job to regulate the rules. Doing so will just start a debate and bring the topic off track.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|