Geforce FX review! I'm defo keeping my Radeon!

gibbon565

look at this Geforce FX review http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDIx

What a Peice of Shit, look at the quality of the anti-aliasing and it can only do 8x filtering compared to the 16 of the Radeon
look at the FSSA quality! In most benchmarks it is about the same as the Radeon ..lol Sometimes the Radeon is slightly faster and vice versa. Personally I think all Nvidia has left is it's reputation for drivers and it's BiG! name. Most first time buyers or n00bs...hehe(computer iliterate)go for the big names and nvidia is one of those. So there is still a market, yet I think ATI is starting to break the crust tbh. Look at the quality of the Radeon 9700 compared to the Geforce FX, imo the Geforce FX is merely a rehashed and faster clocked geforce 4(like the geforce 4 was a faster geforce 3)
I mean why pay 2wice as much for a card that isn't even better or in many cases worsE!
Lets be honest ATI are going to come back and take the crown again from nvidia with the R350, Nvidia is taking the same downword spiral as 3Dfx and it's all because they missed a product cycle.

digitalwanderer

I don't read that site no more, my fave review of the FX so far is still AnananananandaTech's review entitled, "The FX is here, but is it any good?" (BTW-The answer is a very tentative "yes, but it's way too expensive and the 9700Pro is probably better"...IMHO )

But don't be in any hurry, their site is currently pretty jammed. (As is everyone else who put up their review today.)

gibbon565

Yeah Anandtech know there stuff tbh and what a harsh reality it is for Nvidia

serAph

haha - whats ironic is that nVidia's 8x AF is better than ATi's 16x AF - but dont take my word for it - test'em yourself. Ive seen the pictures that prove it on several sites - any of them that do a quality comparison.