DriverHeaven Photoshop V2 Benchmark - available for members - Page 4

Robert McClelland · Feb 26, 2005, 10:42 PM

Which is better higher or lower

?

toddsmack2k · Feb 26, 2005, 10:48 PM

Teh lower Teh better Robert.

Majin GeoDooD · Feb 27, 2005, 11:55 PM

AMD Athlon XP 2800+, MSI KT4VL, 512 MB PC2700 RAM (1x512), Windows 2000 Professional. Photoshop CS.

1: Texturiser Test (1)
8.9 seconds
2: CYMK Colour Conversion
7.7 seconds
3: RGB Colour Conversion
9.7 seconds
4: Dust and Scratches
7.4 seconds
5: Watercolour
88.3 seconds
6: Texturiser Test (2)
8.6 seconds
7: Stained Glass
15.3 seconds
8: Lighting Effects
7.4 seconds
9: Mosiac Tiles
29.1 seconds
10: Extrude
99.0 seconds
11: Smart Blur
78.4 seconds
12. Underpainting
54.4 seconds
Total time: 414.2.

udkjack · Feb 28, 2005, 06:37 AM

Photoshop CS, Mac OS X 10.3.8, PowerMac G5 1.6 GHz, 1.2 GB RAM PC333

Results:

Code:

01. Texturizer (1) ..... 9.9s
02. CMYK ............... 4.3s
03. RGB ................ 5.4s
04. Dust/Scratches ..... 9.3s
05. Watercolor ........ 47.2s
06. Texturizer (2) .... 13.5s
07. Stained Glass ..... 18.2s
08. Lighting .......... 11.2s
09. Mosaic Tiles ...... 51.6s
10. Extrude .......... 101.1s
11. Smart Blur ....... 100.8s
12. Underpainting ..... 60.5s
-----------------------------
Total ................ 433.0s

pr0digal jenius · Mar 1, 2005, 05:35 AM

Texturizer: 3.0
CMYK: 2.4
RGB: 3.5
Dust & Scratches: 4.1
Watercolor: 35.9
Texturizer: 4.6
Stained Glass: 9.1
Lighting Effects: 4.7
Mosaic Tiles: 22.0
Extrude: 53.6
Smart Blur: 41.2
Underpainting: 31.3
===========
TOTAL: 215.7

I'll try again tomorrow on a freshboot. I ran this right after some partition magicing and a total 18 hours uptime

Maybe we can dip below 200 tomorrow with a more agressive clock speed too...this was on my "warm weather" OC....and it's cold in my new apartment

I would try and catch Z, but that's useless

Oh, specs, I forgot:
====================
Dual Xeons @ 156x22(3.44GHz)
2GB Corsair XMS DDR333 TwinX (4x 512MB) @ 2-3-2-5
2x 160GB 8MB Cache Seagate SATA Barracuda drives in Promise Fasttrack 378 RAID-0
Asus PC-DL Deluxe mainboard
Photoshop CS 8.0
Windows XP Pro SP2

Danhill · Mar 1, 2005, 06:23 AM

Great score there PJ.

I belive I must give your stapler back.

6,9 seconds faster then me, maybe tommorow I'll get my stapler back

tzubak · Mar 1, 2005, 08:57 AM

Dual 2.5 ghz G5
2 gig DDR 400 ram
160 SATA 7200 HD
Nvidia 6800 Ultra
OS X 10.3.7
Photoshop CS

1: Texturiser Test (1)
10.1 seconds

2: CYMK Colour Conversion
2.3 seconds

3: RGB Colour Conversion
2.4 seconds

4: Dust and Scratches
3.5 seconds

5: Watercolour
31.1 Seconds

6: Texturiser Test (2)
9.2 seconds

7: Stained Glass
10.5 seconds

8: Lighting Effects
4.6 seconds

9: Mosiac Tiles
43.2 seconds

10: Extrude
66.4 seconds

11: Smart Blur
60.4 seconds

12. Underpainting
39.6 seconds

Total=283.3

***Zardon*** · Mar 1, 2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danhill

Great score there PJ.

I belive I must give your stapler back.

6,9 seconds faster then me, maybe tommorow I'll get my stapler back

A few tweaks here and there, you should be able to crack it.

Danhill · Mar 1, 2005, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zardon

A few tweaks here and there, you should be able to crack it.

Yes, I'm going to do my best

pr0digal jenius · Mar 1, 2005, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zardon

A few tweaks here and there, you should be able to crack it.

Well, a fresh reboot just dropped me to 213.9...without runnign SeeSaw, so with some more OCing and cleaning out my taskmanager and such, I MIGHT make it under 200....MAYBE

davidnsibs · Mar 1, 2005, 05:10 PM

ive run this a few times now on 7 and on CS and I find that apart from stained glass where there is a big improvement there is little improvement or even an increase e.g. smart blur from 35.7 to 72.7!!! I'll post a more detailed comparison when I get around to it but I'm programming some nice Numerical Methods in Fortran at the moment .. coursewrok YAY

Also, another quick coment, I'm finding that on some of the tasks it takes quite a while (eg 10 secs) to start (well for the blue progress bar at the bottom to start counting up), and this is definitely increasing the time to complete. is this normal and what is it doing, cacheing something in the RAM or something?

pr0digal jenius · Mar 1, 2005, 06:29 PM

does that for me 2, and yes, I think it is caching the current image into RAM

***Zardon*** · Mar 2, 2005, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidnsibs

ive run this a few times now on 7 and on CS and I find that apart from stained glass where there is a big improvement there is little improvement or even an increase e.g. smart blur from 35.7 to 72.7!!! I'll post a more detailed comparison when I get around to it but I'm programming some nice Numerical Methods in Fortran at the moment .. coursewrok YAY

Also, another quick coment, I'm finding that on some of the tasks it takes quite a while (eg 10 secs) to start (well for the blue progress bar at the bottom to start counting up), and this is definitely increasing the time to complete. is this normal and what is it doing, cacheing something in the RAM or something?

This is why I said it will be also impossible to compare the time for this bench between versions of photoshop, specific filters tend to run faster on CS and yes a few even run a little slower. generally though CS is faster.
As for the blue progress bar, this is not specific to the bench, its just how photoshop handles the filter -it has started even before the bar appears, you will find in Version 7, the progress bar pops up immediately but will run slower once it does so.

loriel60 · Mar 2, 2005, 12:04 PM

Fantastic benchmark!!! This is exactly what i was looking for!!
Thank you and well done.

I'm " digital" photographer. I knew that my workflow would benefit from a computer upgrade.....well in this case is more a Complete new system.
Just for reference here is my result.......and DO not laugh

, i have this system for 4 years!!!

Dell 8100 pentium4, intel 850, 1.4Ghz socket 423, 640mb Rambus ( pc-800-ECC). NTFS file system,
Channel 1= master: ST,120Gg, 3 partitions
slave : WD, 80Gg, 3 partitions

Channel 2= master: WD,160Gg, 2 partitions
slave : DVDrw Liteon LDW 811s

Windows xp pro, access to the net through a router.
Photoshop CS.

1: Texturiser Test (1)
21.8 seconds

2: CYMK Colour Conversion
12.1 seconds

3: RGB Colour Conversion
16 seconds

4: Dust and Scratches
16.6 seconds

5: Watercolour
75 Seconds

6: Texturiser Test (2)
12.9 seconds

7: Stained Glass
22.8 seconds

8: Lighting Effects
22.3 seconds

9: Mosaic Tiles
54.8 seconds

10: Extrude
136.5 seconds

11: Smart Blur
103.1 seconds

12. Underpainting
81.5 seconds

Total : 575.4.....seconds!!!

This is after defrag of all the disk and shut down of all possible background services, NAV and firewall.
In normal use the average of 3 runs is 589 seconds.

Et voila......

G@MeBoY · Mar 3, 2005, 07:34 AM

I must stress that this test DOES NOT use 64-bit instructions since photoshop works with wowexec 32 bit code. Sorry folks, will have to wait for a new version of PS for 64 bit computing

My results:

XP2000+ TB-b @2100mhz (210x10) hynix d443 11-4-4-3 (trash memory)

1: Texturiser Test (1)
7.2
2: CYMK Colour Conversion
7.3
3: RGB Colour Conversion
9.3
4: Dust and Scratches
6.8
5: Watercolour
41.8
6: Texturiser Test (2)
7.9
7: Stained Glass
13.4
8: Lighting Effects
9.5
9: Mosiac Tiles
27.5
10: Extrude
77.3
11: Smart Blur
62.0
12. Underpainting
52.2

TOTAL:
322.2 s

I am currently using my friends memory and have watter cooling out for service so best memory can do is 210 with 3-4-4 timings. I will re-bench as soon as I get my V-Datas back (they do 230) and watter cooling back in (currently raptor cool) Then I will bench at 230x10.5