Aug 20, 2003, 09:57 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Memory Conflicts among three 875/865 motherboards
Succotash is a traditional staple-food among the Pennsylvanian Dutch. Consisting of boiled green corn and lima beans, sautéed onion, bacon, and served in a cream sauce. It's what one makes, when the crop's fail, and one is desperate. What does this have to do with the memory conflicts I'm about to detail? About as much as the memory itself. I'm beginning to believe those early, nefarious rumours, describing the Springdale (865) chipset as being conceived in a conspiracy between Intel's marketing, and engineering. Claims have been made, Q&C tests performed on initial batches of 875 silicon (NB-MCH) where the NB silicon failed so many criteria, and a budget version had to be released. Intel, in an effort to save thousands of pieces from the dumpster, announced Canterwood's younger brother, Springdale. Has Intel taken sub-par silicon, and made Succotash? I sincerely hope not.
Full article at MadShrimps.be
|
|
|
