|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Jul 26, 2003, 04:14 PM
|
#1 |
|
News Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,400
Rep Power: 0
|
Catalyst 3.6 and Omega 2.4.74 report at Dark][Tweaker
Dark][Tweaker has thrown up their Catalyst 3.6 and Omega 2.4.74 Driver report you'll be surprised to hear that Omega's Drivers beat the Catalyst's 3.6 drivers in the 3DMark2001 benchmarks! I haven't used google to translate the article as I'll let the benchmarks do the talking.
Catalyst 3.6 and Omega 2.4.74 report at Dark][Tweaker |
|
|
|
Jul 26, 2003, 07:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Recovering Beta Tester
|
Nothing against Omega, who has done great service for the 3dfx, Nvidia, and ATI communities, but concluding that anyone is a winner on any of those benchmarks is grossly inaccurate. Maybe when you scale graphs to .1 fps on the Y Axis you can make it look like a large difference on a particular benchmark but none of the differences appear to be within 1% of the next best score.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 26, 2003, 07:47 PM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0
|
I think it is accurate because his drivers were consistantly faster. If they won about as many tests as they lost it would be a draw, but they were always faster then the regular 3.6s. I'm not in it for the speed though, I'm in it for the image quality.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 27, 2003, 11:32 AM
|
#4 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
the omega release Vs orginal I experianced a LOWER score with the omega in 2001se over the defult with the sliders simply moved to performance .... I was  shocked ... too but mabe its my setup i am geting better results with the officals...I am running the latest beta nforce2 drivers and the latest sp2 beta... all the latest everthting I tweak my system to the max as well ... often re-tweaking for a few extra points |
|
|
|
|
