|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Oct 1, 2004, 03:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
Intel 2.4c GHz vs. AMD 64 3200 --Which is best?
Hi, I have two option.
1. Buy Intel 3.0 processor which has H/T technology; or
2. Buy AMD 64bit 3200 processor which support 64bit
Price level of both processors are same in my country (App. $170).
Plz help me.
Last edited by rajun; Oct 3, 2004 at 01:48 PM.
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2004, 04:02 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
第3 子供
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nerv HQ
Posts: 1,322
|
In my opinion #2 ; no questions asked. You can't compare the performance between a 2.4 P4 and an Athlon 64 3200+.
The Athlon 64 3200 wins in my opinion.
__________________
Xfire: [Shinji1225 \ Status]
A7N8X-E Deluxe
Athlon XP 2500+ (@ 2.2 GHz 11x200 MHz FSB)
Corsair TwinX XMS 1GB PC3200 Dual Channel (2-2-3-5)
ATi Radeon 9500 Pro (@ 330\310) \ Omega Catalyst Drivers v2.5.90
Ultra X-Connect 500W PSU
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2004, 04:05 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
64 3200 wins , in games and bechmarks
intel wins in multi tasking
__________________
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2004, 06:08 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
So which one is more speedy.
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2004, 06:31 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Demonic
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the cold, dark north...
Posts: 5,094
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rajun
So which one is more speedy.
|
The A64 without a doubt, unless you're planning to overclock the P4 to hell and back. 
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2004, 12:08 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shinjikun
In my opinion #2 ; no questions asked. You can't compare the performance between a 2.4 P4 and an Athlon 64 3200+.
The Athlon 64 3200 wins in my opinion.
|
what he said
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI)
M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1
320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7
NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW
Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower
personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2004, 03:16 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
Thanks, I m reading the review.........
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 12:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
i'd go with the A64 unless you are into stuff like digital video/sound editing
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 02:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
I love to be a owner of AMD 64, but the main problem is that I want a MOBO which have builtin decent quality sound card and graphics card.
I have Tk. 20000 / $330 for upgrade my computer. And in my country AMD 64 3200+ is about Tk. 12000 / $200. So I only have $130 to buy a MOBO, sound card and AGP Card. Its a tight budget.
So if any one know a MOBO which have built in sound and AGP card (good quality) under $130 or atleast a MOBO that have decent quality sound card under $100 plz tell me.
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 03:34 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,475
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rajun
So which one is more speedy.
|
Its not really even close, No2. you would need to go to a P4 3200 to compare, or a 3000 overclocked 
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 03:35 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,475
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dipstick
|
Until you overclock 
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 04:23 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
I dont want to overclock (not now). so what u suggestion?
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 04:25 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rajun
Hi, I have two option.
1. Buy Intel 3.0 processor which has H/T technology; or
2. Buy AMD 64bit 3200 processor which support 64bit
Price level of both processors are same in my country (App. $200).
Plz help me.
|
I made some change. P4 3.0 processor instead of 2.4c
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2004, 04:40 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,475
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rajun
I dont want to overclock (not now). so what u suggestion?
|
from the choices you put up, I already said no2. With a P4 stock 3ghz id still say the AMD 64.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|