Asus P5K Premium vs Asus Maximus SE

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 10, 2007, 01:14 PM

Would anyone be interested in side by side comparisons of these boards?

The P5K Premium is P35, and the Maximus SE is X38.

I have both of them, the maximus is here on Friday, so if you guys can think of anything specifically you want to see lemme know.

I will be posting a few results/findings/impressions on both boards.

procupine14 · Oct 10, 2007, 03:45 PM

actually i may be switching to intel soon so yes I would definitely like to see some good and bad points on how user friendly they are and basically how their specs stack up

Mousey · Oct 10, 2007, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by procupine14

actually i may be switching to intel soon so yes I would definitely like to see some good and bad points on how user friendly they are and basically how their specs stack up

Dude there's no "i may" about it, Intel is the current market Dominator, unless AMD's Socket F takes off, which i severly doubt it will atm

I do really really hope it does though, then Intel will keep it's prices down

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 10, 2007, 08:00 PM

You guys want 3Dmark05/06 with PCmark05 as well as some Pi calcs, and Everest bandwidth testing?

mike2h · Oct 10, 2007, 08:07 PM

is that x38 board ddr3? if so i would be really interested in a mem comparison, especially oc'd.
either way, i would appreciate antything you offer up

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 10, 2007, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike2h

is that x38 board ddr3? if so i would be really interested in a mem comparison, especially oc'd.
either way, i would appreciate antything you offer up

Its DDR2

I wont go DDR3 till I see Dominator XMS3 DDR3 2000+ 7-7-7-14

Until then its DDR2 haha.

Test is looking to be-

Q6600 G0 Quadcore
Asus P5K Premium (P35)
Asus ROG Maximus Formula (X38)
Corsair Dominator 6400C3DF x 4GB
HD2900XT 1GB @ 875/1100
And a single WD Raptor 150gb 16mb cache

Vista x64 will be the OS of choice w/ readyboost on with Corsair Voyager GT 8GB.

=================
I will be doing clock/clock comparisons between them at following speeds.

Unless there is a need for stock comparisons? I wont be doing them.

400x9 - 3.6ghz DDR2 800 3-3-3-6/4-4-4-10
400x9 - 3.6ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10
450x8 - 3.6ghz DDR2 900 3-3-3-6/4-4-4-10
450x9 - 4.0ghz DDR2 900 4-4-4-10
500x7 - 3.5ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10
And max testable FSB? If it matters.

Using 3dMark05/06 and PCmark05 at 4ghz most likely DDR2 1000

Everest Engineer Edition with full benchmark suite, with comparisons between CAS3 and CAS4 (for those that can use that) I will also do 5-5-5-15 if there is a call for it.

Lemme know if I missed something.

procupine14 · Oct 11, 2007, 12:07 PM

nope I think thats pretty much covering everthing i want to see

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 11, 2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX

=================
I will be doing clock/clock comparisons between them at following speeds.

Unless there is a need for stock comparisons? I wont be doing them.

400x9 - 3.6ghz DDR2 800 3-3-3-6/4-4-4-10
400x9 - 3.6ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10
450x8 - 3.6ghz DDR2 900 3-3-3-6/4-4-4-10
450x9 - 4.0ghz DDR2 900 4-4-4-10
500x7 - 3.5ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10
And max testable FSB? If it matters.

Using 3dMark05/06 and PCmark05 at 4ghz most likely DDR2 1000

Everest Engineer Edition with full benchmark suite, with comparisons between CAS3 and CAS4 (for those that can use that) I will also do 5-5-5-15 if there is a call for it.

Lemme know if I missed something.

Reevaluated the scope of this review to be more practical for this type of review.

Will now be doing.....

400x9 DDR2 800 3-3-3-6 and 4-4-4-10
400x9 DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10
450x8 DDR2 900 4-4-4-10
450x8 DDR2 1080 4-4-4-10

PCmark05, 3D05, 3D06 with 4ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10 (very tight subtimings)

reworked to viable 24/7 layouts of board testing, as well as a max performance with pcmark, 3dmark and everest bench suite. Just rethank since I am only doing 2 boards, and not mutliples

mike2h · Oct 11, 2007, 08:11 PM

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 11, 2007, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike2h

lol.

Still works ey?

PangingJr · Oct 12, 2007, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX

4ghz DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10 (very tight subtimings)

since you will be testing a 4GHz DDR2-1000 4-4-4-10, i presume the FSB : DRAM will be 1:1,

i appreciate if you could... i like very much to see the below test results with the boards and 2GHz of RAM and the Q6600.

mine is with CAS4 (and with loose timings - CAS4-4-4-12 RRD=11 RFC=46)

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 12, 2007, 01:29 PM

Starting tonight

**ChaosMinionX** · Oct 12, 2007, 02:28 PM

Hey pang, TRFC of 46 is pretty loose, I generally run 20-25TRFC and all other subtimings on Asus boards at 3-4. I will see what I can do though, perhaps you can give me your BIOS settings instead of the memset image, sometimes it reads them wrong.

kris23 · Oct 12, 2007, 04:05 PM

you are a sick, sick man......

PangingJr · Oct 12, 2007, 04:23 PM

the Memset will only report the values that have already been calculated by the Intel chipsets, it is kinda normal that Memset reports higher values (in Windows) than the BIOS settings.

and no, you don�t have to waste your time going to match my DRAM settings, my Gigabyte board has different and less DRAM settings than the Asus's.
please run the timings the way you use to, and then run the everest, super_pi, etc. i just like to see the memory performance and the number difference from one board to the other.

and if you could, test the 5:6 and 4:5 as well.