|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Athens, Hellas
Posts: 813
Rep Power: 47 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ATI Proprietary Linux x86 Drivers for Linux 8.16.20 (August 17, 2005) discussion
As expected, a new Linux driver was released today, version 8.16.20. Here are the release notes:
Quote:
Download: ATI Driver Installer XFree86 4.1 : Download XFree86 4.2 : Download XFree86 4.3 : Download X.Org 6.8 : Download |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Freedom is a feature.
|
Well, what else can I say than... THANK YOU ATI!
__________________
-- Vedran |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Installation failed on fedora core 4, x86_64, 2.6.12 while building the kernel module. But it installed enough of the drivers for 2d support. This is on a Compaq v2312 with the 200 Xpress. I opened a ticket with ATI; hopefully they can get it fixed..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,256
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
vsync doesn't work anymore - or the setting changed from
Code:
Option "Capabilities" "0x00000800" ![]() vsync howto
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts Last edited by UberLord; Aug 31, 2005 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
As for now i have one particular problem, pretty big for me: i'm using 1280x960 resolution since i got my LG Flatron, as it's the best and most optimal resolution for it (1280x1024 is not keeping 4:3 aspect ratio, therefore it utterly sux) and now after installing those damn drivers this resolution is not available for me
![]() Any suggestions? I tried doing something with xorg.conf for no avail. I really need that resolution, so any help appreciated. Thanks in advance.
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth. ~George Bernar Shaw |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Freedom is a feature.
|
Quote:
__________________
-- Vedran |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,256
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Does anyone elses system hang when they restart X?
EDIT: Issue with radeonfb - vesafb works fine
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts Last edited by UberLord; Aug 31, 2005 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
About that resolution: i forgot to mention i'm still pretty much linux noob, so if you could just point me in the right direction, 'cause i was trying to change resolution manually, but then X won't start saying that there's error in xorg.conf...
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth. ~George Bernar Shaw |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Dear ' MaxiM ' , Please elaborate that which driver you installed...... it is not possible to get the desired Resolution until a proper driver of the graphics Card is installed.
Please you tell me about your Distro and it's Version : is it x86 (32 BIT ) or x86_64 ( 64 BIT ) ? ? ? ? and also can you tell me is your system is based on 64 BIT architecture or not ? Without knowing these things i can't help you...... regards................ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Ok, so it's Mandriva 2005 LE x86 and i have installed driver for Xorg (as usual). Everything works fine, acceleration is OK and all other resolutions work with apropriate refresh rate, just not 1280x960 which dissapeared from my list of resolutions and setting it both by fglrxconfig and manually in xorg.conf doesnt help, switching my desktop to lower available resolution. Hope that clears things out a bit
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth. ~George Bernar Shaw |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
run , ' fglrxconfig ' , again , and put ' HSync & VSync' of your monitor your self. Don't use, existing sync ratio(s).
Second, did your Mandriva install your monitor. ? I hope it did. One thing to be noted about Hsync and Vsync , these two values are : which user supposed to put in himself , other wise, for every value ( while configuring 'fglrx' ) just press Enter , Entet and Enter. After putting these two values, there will be next option which show you the supported "Resolution" of the monitor with 24 BIT colors , and ask you id " DO YOU WANT TO CHANGE IT OR IT IS OK " CHECK CAREFULLY, if YOUR DESIRED RESOLUTION IS IN THE SEQUENCE, then Select " VALUE IS OK " if NOT then Choose " Change Value Option " Please do this and write the result of this ............ regards. - Be.Gurmeet.Be |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
D'oh! I should be more specific from the start - so, i'm not that noob :P
I do things exactly as you told me to, yes my monitor is OK, everything was fine with the previous drivers, yes i've set the correct resolution - well, i know what i'm doing in that matter to sum it up. But still this one particular resolution is not available, even tho it's configured correctly in xorg.conf and that's why i'm here (a bit frustrated). I hoped for some .conf trick to bring back my optimal res which is ignored by X right now. Maybe i should also reinstall Xorg?
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth. ~George Bernar Shaw |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello everybody.
I'm quite a newbie in linux and hope someone can help me. Recently I got Radeon X800XL PCI-E instead of on-board video that worked fine on my FC-4. After trying few times to change video card in Display settings window to X800LE....X800XT (X-win failed each time I restarted it) I went to ATI site and downloaded their driver (.run file). What I did after: 1. run the installer (went fine) 2. rebooted 3. run the config tool leaving almost all options by default 4. rebooted Result: KDE started normally with 1280 resolution BUT... 1. ATI control doesn't want to start - it's button appears on the task panel for few seconds, then disappears. (btw, for some reason there're 2 "ATI Control" entries in main menu) 2. In KDE's Display settings window the possible resolutions are only 800 and 640, video card type is "unknown", as well as the monitor type. Could anyone help me with this? Thanx. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I just installed the latest driver version fglrx64_6_8_0_16.20, build the custom one for my system SUSE9.3 (up to here, everything perfect) , rebooted, started Xwindows and got a blank screen that does not even let me switch to console mode. so I guess I´ll need to switch off the laptop! Desperating, as lastest ATI release notes finally do list explicitly the Xpress200 as card this driver is valid for...On the other hand, if you issue rpm -qi with the new custom build rpm no reference to Xpress200 appears. This makes me thing it is still an unresolved issue.
following the instructtions, one should configure it with fglrxconfig. Weird thing about this is that fglrxconfig does not have any option for the Xpress200! So you can't use it for configuring it. Any way, I saved the xorg.xconf it generates after it complains that not valid graphic card was found, re-edited to fix things like pciid, screen section, etc. Still the same problem persists. Even using the xorg that worked with previous fglrx version (although I never got it working, but was always falling back to mesa). The funny thing is that I get no error nowhere, i.e., dmesg shows: Quote:
Quote:
Another detail, I have this laptop conected to the net and I just checkec it is still responding to an ssh. So I can still log in from my desktop. Just the screen remains blank and it does not recognize the combinations CRTL+ALT+Fn, with n=1-6... One gets the feeling I'd be close to get everything working fine, but there is still something missing. Any help, suggestions...? Where could I get a clue about what is going wrong (as neither Xorg.0.log nor dmesg give no complain)? thanks, Last edited by masanlop; Sep 6, 2005 at 10:32 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
The following (is there any way to send it attached?) xorg.0.log I got it after (partially) generating a new xorg.conf with fglrxconfig and re-editing it to add key sections that were missing. Quote:
Quote:
I'll leave the dmesg output for another posting if someone ask for it. I'd appreciate any help as I do need 64bits (someone said installing suse32 makes everything working flawlessly), SUSE (I got used to it; not the time right now to change) and 3D. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
once exiting root, fglrxinfo simply did not responded. A top showed that X was using 99.5% cpu as if X was trying to "finish" something, which might explain why I could access to any window ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
ATI Linux Staff
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Masanlop,
It is possible that the correct sync is not being set. Look for the following entries in /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
Next, you may want to find out the exact sync ranges for your laptop panel. I couldn't find them on Google (it seems others are looking too), but Compaq might be able to tell you. Anyway, the correct values should be entered in xorg.conf for HorizSync and VertRefresh Hope it helps
__________________
Regards, Robert Gregory Software QA Team Lead, Linux Software Engineering ATI Technologies Inc., Markham, Ontario, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
And now, no matter what I do, 1280x960 is gone. I've set out my sync rates properly to suit my monitor, and even other flaming resolution works except the one I use! If I run xrandr, it gives this result: Code:
SZ: Pixels Physical Refresh 0 1600 x 1200 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 60 *1 1152 x 864 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 85 *75 70 60 47 43 2 1024 x 768 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 85 75 72 70 60 43 100 90 3 800 x 600 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 85 75 72 70 60 56 120 100 90 4 640 x 480 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 85 75 72 60 120 100 90 5 1280 x 1024 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 70 60 47 43 6 640 x 400 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 60 7 512 x 384 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 8 400 x 600 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 60 9 320 x 480 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 60 10 320 x 400 ( 478mm x 359mm ) 75 60 ATI are evil. They killed 1280x960. I'm going back to the previous version, if I can find the installer. I'll let you guys know if 1280x960 works when I switch back. Edit: Just fired up 8.14.13... worked first time. Looks like I'll be sticking with this until ATI actually put the PROPER 1280 back in... Last edited by finite; Sep 19, 2005 at 10:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
i realize this was a few months ago, but i've been having the same problem and finally got it working. so maybe someone else will come across this thread like i did... first, in the Device section, like it says to do here: Code:
Option "NoDDC" Code:
# 1280x960 @ 85.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 85.68 kHz; pclk: 149.43 MHz Modeline "1280x960_custom" 149.43 1280 1376 1512 1744 960 961 964 1008 -HSync +Vsync Code:
Modes "1280x960_custom" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
I did the same for all the lower resolutions, so now fullscreen apps that use 800x600/640x480 run at 120Hz rather than 85Hz. (The 120Hz option for these was always there in xrandr, but wasn't default and most games/etc don't allow you to choose.) Happiness. ![]() Now to try out X.org 6.9/7.0 and see if the new drivers work with that. (My reliance on the old 8.14.13 drivers was preventing me from upgrading X.org...) Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|