|
 |
|
Aug 3, 2005, 04:13 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Athens, Hellas
Posts: 846
|
What do you want to see from ATI's drivers in the future?
I am mostly asking feature-wise. What do you think should be the No.1 feature that should be implemented asap? A better control panel? Overclocking options? Something else? I am curious to what the community has to say about this 
__________________
There is no spoon...
AMD // Kombatant's Lair
me != AMD ==> my posts != AMD's views
|
|
|
Aug 3, 2005, 10:30 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
|
I like driver installer. However, there is a lot of stuff I would also like to see; from most important to least important:
* FreeBSD driver.
* Support for X.Org composite/damage extension.
* Better fglrxconfig. Perhaps it shouldn't generate entire xorg.conf, but only add the necessary stuff wherever needed. I never had luck with it and always had to edit xorg.conf by hand.
* Get rid of the internal agpgart if possible; submit patches to kernel in order to make the agpgart in kernel works as good as this one.
* Reduce installer size, if possible.
* Something similar or powerful as CCC or Windows CP. CCC is written in .net, which is C#, so it might be possible to port it.
* If that's not possible, perhaps an improved control panel with both GTK and QT frontends.
* OpenSolaris driver. Not nearly as important as FreeBSD, but would be nice.
Also, a question: How come that ATI always lists "we support 2.6.x kernel with this driver" in release notes? Is it really needed, since installer can now compile the driver for specific kernel automatically?
__________________
|
|
|
Aug 5, 2005, 09:45 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 32
|
in addition to what Riv@nvx said i'd really like an overclocking option something like radclocker for windows. it would be really appreciated.
|
|
|
Aug 6, 2005, 07:01 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BulletFx
in addition to what Riv@nvx said i'd really like an overclocking option something like radclocker for windows. it would be really appreciated.
|
Yeah, that would indeed be cool; but I would rather underclock than overclock 
It would be even cooler if it would allow (automatic) downclocking to save some power on laptop battery. I think it's called PowerPlay on Windows Catalyst drivers.
__________________
|
|
|
Aug 14, 2005, 07:21 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kombatant
I am mostly asking feature-wise. What do you think should be the No.1 feature that should be implemented asap? A better control panel? Overclocking options? Something else? I am curious to what the community has to say about this 
|
framebuffer_object, pixel_buffer_object
EDIT: Oh I forgot: GLX_SGI_video_sync
Last edited by lcs : Aug 14, 2005 at 10:17 AM.
|
|
|
Aug 15, 2005, 10:24 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
ATI Staff
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lcs
framebuffer_object, pixel_buffer_object
EDIT: Oh I forgot: GLX_SGI_video_sync
|
pbuffers have been in for a while.
fbo's will come in a later release.
GLX_SGI_video_sync, I am not sure when.
Regards,
Matthew
|
|
|
Aug 15, 2005, 12:56 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mtippett
pbuffers have been in for a while.
|
Shouldn't "glxinfo |grep -i GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object" return something? Here it doesn't return anything (even when try "glxinfo |grep -i pixel_buffer" - when only non arb pixel_buffer_object is supported - i get nothing). So I would say that it maybe supports it (I haven't really tested it), but doesn't tell it via glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS).
I forgot some informations:
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9600 XT Generic
OpenGL version string: 1.3.5140 (X4.3.0-8.14.13)
__________________
I want YOU for the A.T.I ARMY
Last edited by Moshroum : Aug 15, 2005 at 01:42 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 18, 2005, 06:08 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
|
1. Speed compared to windows version!
2. Speed compared to windows version!!
3. Speed compared to windows version!!!
4. Half-decent control panel that would replace fglrxconfig as much as it can.
5. Overdrive...
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth.
~George Bernar Shaw
|
|
|
Aug 19, 2005, 05:19 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by =MaxiM=
4. Half-decent control panel that would replace fglrxconfig as much as it can.
|
I don't think you understand the point of fglrxconfig. It's simply ATI modified version of xorgconfig/xf86config. It is designed to generate xorg.conf. It's not (at least from what I understand) the tool to configure the card every time you want to start a game.
But I agree, it would be cool if the card settings could somehow be configured via control panel, by user that isn't necessarily root.
__________________
|
|
|
Aug 24, 2005, 10:25 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mtippett
pbuffers have been in for a while.
fbo's will come in a later release.
GLX_SGI_video_sync, I am not sure when.
|
Are we talking about the same thing? I mean EXT_pixel_buffer_object, similar to ARB_vertex_buffer_object but for memory-mapping textures.
GLX_SGI_video_sync: Being able to wait for vsync and draw a few pre-composed rectangles is nice, but one might be able to just swap buffers and draw to the front buffer. I've not tried yet.
EDIT: FBO: Never mind. (Another small test program works so I must have done something wrong in my code.)
Last edited by lcs : Aug 25, 2005 at 12:47 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2005, 12:48 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 28
|
How about all the HDTV and SDTV resolutions found in the Windows version BUT(!!!) with a refresh rate of 50Hz as well as the usual 60Hz
so that means 1024x576i @ 50Hz, 1024x576p @ 50Hz, 1280x720p @ 50Hz, 1920x1080i @ 50Hz, and the two ATi optimised resolutions of 1152x648p and 1776x1000i, also at 50Hz
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2005, 02:59 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 622
|
I would mainly like to be able to install the *&^%%$ things. I wish they could make it straight forward like windows. 
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2005, 04:52 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Blues man
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 35
|
A working installer would be nice (It didn't work in ubuntu), becouse manually compiling kernel module and bla bla bla is a pain in the ass.
A nice control panel like the old windows control panel (not the bloated .net thingy).
RENDER, DAMAGE and COMPOSITE extension would be nice too.
Ahm, and some performance.
fglrxconfig should only touch the sections it needs, not the whole thing, or ask about it.
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2005, 10:33 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 62
|
The things are already said:
-) smaller installer
-) speed as the Windows drivers
-) stability as the Windows drivers
-) all features as the Windows drivers (TV-Output, ...)
-) a good Linux control-panel
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2005, 11:14 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 75
|
Improved multi-monitor support. Right now it's extremely inconvenient (i.e still isn't working properly).
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|