Go Back   DriverHeaven > Forums > Graphics Cards > ATI Radeon Drivers > Linux Radeon Display Drivers
Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 3, 2005, 04:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
Kombatant
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Kombatant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Athens, Hellas
Posts: 846
Kombatant is a glorious beacon of lightKombatant is a glorious beacon of lightKombatant is a glorious beacon of lightKombatant is a glorious beacon of lightKombatant is a glorious beacon of lightKombatant is a glorious beacon of light

What do you want to see from ATI's drivers in the future?

I am mostly asking feature-wise. What do you think should be the No.1 feature that should be implemented asap? A better control panel? Overclocking options? Something else? I am curious to what the community has to say about this
__________________
There is no spoon...
AMD // Kombatant's Lair

me != AMD ==> my posts != AMD's views
Kombatant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2005, 10:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
RIV@NVX
Freedom is a feature.
 
RIV@NVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
RIV@NVX is on a distinguished road

I like driver installer. However, there is a lot of stuff I would also like to see; from most important to least important:

* FreeBSD driver.
* Support for X.Org composite/damage extension.
* Better fglrxconfig. Perhaps it shouldn't generate entire xorg.conf, but only add the necessary stuff wherever needed. I never had luck with it and always had to edit xorg.conf by hand.
* Get rid of the internal agpgart if possible; submit patches to kernel in order to make the agpgart in kernel works as good as this one.
* Reduce installer size, if possible.
* Something similar or powerful as CCC or Windows CP. CCC is written in .net, which is C#, so it might be possible to port it.
* If that's not possible, perhaps an improved control panel with both GTK and QT frontends.
* OpenSolaris driver. Not nearly as important as FreeBSD, but would be nice.

Also, a question: How come that ATI always lists "we support 2.6.x kernel with this driver" in release notes? Is it really needed, since installer can now compile the driver for specific kernel automatically?
__________________
RIV@NVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2005, 09:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
BulletFx
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 32
BulletFx is on a distinguished road

in addition to what Riv@nvx said i'd really like an overclocking option something like radclocker for windows. it would be really appreciated.
BulletFx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2005, 07:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
RIV@NVX
Freedom is a feature.
 
RIV@NVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
RIV@NVX is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by BulletFx
in addition to what Riv@nvx said i'd really like an overclocking option something like radclocker for windows. it would be really appreciated.
Yeah, that would indeed be cool; but I would rather underclock than overclock
It would be even cooler if it would allow (automatic) downclocking to save some power on laptop battery. I think it's called PowerPlay on Windows Catalyst drivers.
__________________
RIV@NVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2005, 07:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
lcs
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7
lcs is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kombatant
I am mostly asking feature-wise. What do you think should be the No.1 feature that should be implemented asap? A better control panel? Overclocking options? Something else? I am curious to what the community has to say about this
framebuffer_object, pixel_buffer_object

EDIT: Oh I forgot: GLX_SGI_video_sync

Last edited by lcs : Aug 14, 2005 at 10:17 AM.
lcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2005, 10:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
mtippett
ATI Staff
 
mtippett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22
mtippett is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcs
framebuffer_object, pixel_buffer_object

EDIT: Oh I forgot: GLX_SGI_video_sync
pbuffers have been in for a while.

fbo's will come in a later release.

GLX_SGI_video_sync, I am not sure when.

Regards,

Matthew
mtippett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2005, 12:56 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moshroum
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Moshroum is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtippett
pbuffers have been in for a while.
Shouldn't "glxinfo |grep -i GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object" return something? Here it doesn't return anything (even when try "glxinfo |grep -i pixel_buffer" - when only non arb pixel_buffer_object is supported - i get nothing). So I would say that it maybe supports it (I haven't really tested it), but doesn't tell it via glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS).

I forgot some informations:
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON 9600 XT Generic
OpenGL version string: 1.3.5140 (X4.3.0-8.14.13)
__________________
I want YOU for the A.T.I ARMY

Last edited by Moshroum : Aug 15, 2005 at 01:42 PM.
Moshroum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2005, 06:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
=MaxiM=
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 7
=MaxiM= is on a distinguished road

1. Speed compared to windows version!
2. Speed compared to windows version!!
3. Speed compared to windows version!!!
4. Half-decent control panel that would replace fglrxconfig as much as it can.
5. Overdrive...
__________________
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it; it would be hell on earth.
~George Bernar Shaw
=MaxiM= is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2005, 05:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
RIV@NVX
Freedom is a feature.
 
RIV@NVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,339
RIV@NVX is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by =MaxiM=
4. Half-decent control panel that would replace fglrxconfig as much as it can.
I don't think you understand the point of fglrxconfig. It's simply ATI modified version of xorgconfig/xf86config. It is designed to generate xorg.conf. It's not (at least from what I understand) the tool to configure the card every time you want to start a game.
But I agree, it would be cool if the card settings could somehow be configured via control panel, by user that isn't necessarily root.
__________________
RIV@NVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2005, 10:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
lcs
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7
lcs is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtippett
pbuffers have been in for a while.

fbo's will come in a later release.

GLX_SGI_video_sync, I am not sure when.
Are we talking about the same thing? I mean EXT_pixel_buffer_object, similar to ARB_vertex_buffer_object but for memory-mapping textures.

GLX_SGI_video_sync: Being able to wait for vsync and draw a few pre-composed rectangles is nice, but one might be able to just swap buffers and draw to the front buffer. I've not tried yet.

EDIT: FBO: Never mind. (Another small test program works so I must have done something wrong in my code.)

Last edited by lcs : Aug 25, 2005 at 12:47 PM.
lcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2005, 12:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
DavoNogo
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 28
DavoNogo is on a distinguished road

How about all the HDTV and SDTV resolutions found in the Windows version BUT(!!!) with a refresh rate of 50Hz as well as the usual 60Hz

so that means 1024x576i @ 50Hz, 1024x576p @ 50Hz, 1280x720p @ 50Hz, 1920x1080i @ 50Hz, and the two ATi optimised resolutions of 1152x648p and 1776x1000i, also at 50Hz
DavoNogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2005, 02:59 AM   #12 (permalink)
ronnn
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
ronnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 622
ronnn is on a distinguished road

I would mainly like to be able to install the *&^%%$ things. I wish they could make it straight forward like windows.
ronnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2005, 04:52 AM   #13 (permalink)
Eman Resu
Blues man
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 35
Eman Resu is on a distinguished road

A working installer would be nice (It didn't work in ubuntu), becouse manually compiling kernel module and bla bla bla is a pain in the ass.

A nice control panel like the old windows control panel (not the bloated .net thingy).

RENDER, DAMAGE and COMPOSITE extension would be nice too.

Ahm, and some performance.

fglrxconfig should only touch the sections it needs, not the whole thing, or ask about it.
Eman Resu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2005, 10:33 AM   #14 (permalink)
ghost_zero
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 62
ghost_zero is on a distinguished road

The things are already said:
-) smaller installer
-) speed as the Windows drivers
-) stability as the Windows drivers
-) all features as the Windows drivers (TV-Output, ...)
-) a good Linux control-panel
ghost_zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2005, 11:14 AM   #15 (permalink)
knuth
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 75
knuth is on a distinguished road

Improved multi-monitor support. Right now it's extremely inconvenient (i.e still isn't working properly).
knuth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM. Copyright ©2008 DriverHeaven.net