|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jan 1, 2003, 04:14 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Dual Channel DDR boards
How do Dual Channel DDR boards fair against regular DDR boards? Is there a BIG difference? Are they worth it?
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2003, 04:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,479
|
Their quite faster especially if your processor can make use of the increased bandwidth like your P4.
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2003, 04:17 PM
|
#3
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
|
Well the ram has twice the bandwidth, so however fast your ram is now it will be twice as fast in a dual channel board, unless you one have one stick of ram in that case you wont notice a difference.
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2003, 04:20 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Does Dual Channel DDR work better w/ P4's or AMD's? i.e. a P4 2.4B or a Athlon XP 2600 333FSB?
|
|
|
Jan 1, 2003, 06:58 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,479
|
Hmm... I hate to say this but P4 has the advantage. The Athlons are setup to only access so much bandwidth. However, the Athlons do have some benefit from more memory bandwidth. Take the nforce2 boards for example.
|
|
|
Jan 2, 2003, 01:27 AM
|
#6
|
|
Driverage Snipe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada or NYC, USA
Posts: 372
|
Yep, in general, more bandwith is better, so supply it with whatever it needs 
|
|
|
Jan 2, 2003, 11:35 AM
|
#7
|
|
Flash Banner Hater
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,962
|
ISTR that for the Nforce and Nforce 2 chipsets (for AMD)
The most telling improvement with Dual-DDR was on the onboard graphics - logic also dictates that Dual-DDR would be required for full memory to AGP 8x bandwidth to be achieved.
Small improvemants were noted otherwise, but as the CPU itself only has a single DDR interface to the rest of the syatem, the most that dual-DDR can achieve in that respect is a bit of optimized prefetch.
Despite many saying that the Nforce 2 is NOT good with non-synchronous RAM/CPU. One test rated Dual-DDR (at 400 RAM, 333 CPU) above synchronous 333 working.
|
|
|
Jan 3, 2003, 11:03 PM
|
#8
|
|
Painlord of Ichor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bloinkin!
Posts: 1,610
|
sd
Using PC2100 ddr memory in dual channel mode on a P4 granite bay, it's almost exactly as fast as PC1066 rambus. Which is cool, because DDR is cheaper...especially 2100.
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2003, 04:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,479
|
So what would PC3200 do on a Granite Bay board??? Is there any reviews or test on the web for this?
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2003, 07:10 AM
|
#10
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
I don't think anyone has these boards done yet
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2003, 01:51 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Yeah,
no Granite Bay boards support PC3200 yet.
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2003, 01:55 PM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Intel is planing to release boards that support dual-channel DDR400 in mid-2003. They will be less expensive then the current dual-channel DDR266 boards, because they will be 4-layer instead of the current 6-layer.
|
|
|
|
|
|