|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Jul 25, 2003, 09:47 AM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
SerialATA RAID performance comparison
These are my PC Mark scores running regular ATA and SerialATA RAID 0 setups. The same drives where used for both tests(WD 80GB 8mb cache) with the regular ATA running off a Adaptec 1200A raid card and the serialATA running on the onboard Silicon Image controller using Serillel 2 adapters.
Silicon Image Serial ATA 1749 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1422629 Adaptec ATA 1418 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1373919 So, there you have it, the serialATA adapters work like a charm and are able to pull some more performance out of the same drives. |
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2003, 12:16 PM
|
#2 |
|
Car Audio Guy
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 499
 |
I`m dieing to get some of those western digital 10k rpm sata drives I want bigger than 36 gig though
 |
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2003, 01:26 PM
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
yeah, those things are screamers. Would love to see what two of those could do in a raid setup
 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2003, 05:07 PM
|
#4 |
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
|
Hell.... with my 2 Serial ATA 150 30gb drives... there IS a huge difference.... (going from the ide made drives to the sata is even huger)
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2003, 08:16 PM
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30, 2003, 12:32 PM
|
#6 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Wow, GREAT scores, those are the highest I have ever seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30, 2003, 10:51 PM
|
#7 |
|
DH's #1 Hustla and Pimp
|
how much more is it? i got a western digital caviar 8mb cache. i paid 140 for it (cdn). im thinkin bout an s-ata 200 gb HD next yr
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 02:24 AM
|
#8 |
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,111
|
Running two 80GB Maxtor DMP9 ultra series HDDs in RAID0 I get 1555 ... that isnt serial ATA, just stock IDE / ATA133
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 09:43 AM
|
#9 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
@BiGBrOWnPimpsta, Do you mean how much more do SATA drives cost? At the moment I know of one native SATA drive, the WD Raptor, which is limited to 36GB and costs about $135 online. In it's defence it does spin at 10k rpm but it's still pretty darn expensive for it's size. Next year, the prices, availability and sizes should be alot better. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 10:12 AM
|
#10 |
|
watching 1080i
|
Is 1260 a good score for a 40g 7200rpm ATA 100 w/ a 2mb cach on an old AMD 761/via 686b motherboard?
 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 11:57 AM
|
#11 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Yeah man, that's a sweet score. I couldn't break 1100 with a WD 8mb drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 12:22 PM
|
#12 |
|
watching 1080i
|
I've only run pcmark a few times- the time I got that 1260 was the day I got my HD last year and I had win98se all tweaked. I just ran it again and I only got 824
 - I'm sure I could improve on that if I wanted to, but It's just weird I got that really good score back then. 1260 824 Hmmm, weird. ***Does it test all your HD's? Because I have 1 slow one in there for extra storage. Last edited by BWX; Jul 31, 2003 at 12:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 12:27 PM
|
#13 | |
|
I Play NWN and UT2003
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
And mine are faster than yours...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31, 2003, 09:04 PM
|
#14 | |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
Quote:
I got 1311 about 6 weeks ago, with my IBM drive (2MB cache) on SiS735 mobo: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1352480 PS: Darksider, that score is insane  |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1, 2003, 12:08 AM
|
#15 |
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,111
|
my guess is that is two raptors in RAID....
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1, 2003, 07:24 AM
|
#16 | |
|
I Play NWN and UT2003
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
 I just wonder how they score when in RAID 0 off from something like the ICH5R Southbridge. Mine is off from a Promise Fasttrak 376 chip on my motherboard. |
|
|
|
|
