|
| Notices |
DriverHeaven is currently recruiting for the AWOMO Beta Test / Elite Op Team. AWOMO is a digital download service for games, and we're looking to expand the beta team. If you're interested. Sign up as a member here at DriverHeaven and then head HERE to submit your details. Thanks
For more info on AWOMO visit their site HERE
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Mar 10, 2003, 04:17 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
A7N8X Dlx online!
Well, after recieving the first board broken, I'm glad to say I recieved my new one today. I'm using it now and it is working great! As you may remember last time I had problems with adjusting settings in the BIOS and CPU temp mis-readings. I had no problems what so ever, with anything this time around. All I can say about this board is, wow!  <-- Me likes this smiley.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 05:27 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,518
Rep Power: 57
|
Hey Dom!
Good to hear your back up and running with no glitches! Man that board must of really been hosed then....remember to read around for some "hints" about this board before you start OC'ing.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 05:46 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Thanks, man, I sure will.
I wanna run something by ya.
I notice something different on this board, two things actually. First is in the BIOS there is no option to disable SATA, seems it can only be done manualy, which is no problem. Second is there is no option to select sync mode for the RAM in the BIOS. I think this board is a new revision, but I havn't heard of it. Is there a new revision?
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 07:11 PM
|
#4
|
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,256
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dom
Second is there is no option to select sync mode for the RAM in the BIOS.
|
What do you mean by "sync mode"?
Do you mean options like buffered, un-buffered?
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 07:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by UberLord
What do you mean by "sync mode"?
Do you mean options like buffered, un-buffered?
|
It enabled dual-channel DDR, it had to do with the memory frequency or something (was in the same list as by SPD).
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
Rep Power: 0
|
You mean sync-mode, as in running RAM and CPU at same frequency, right?
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Vampyromaniac
You mean sync-mode, as in running RAM and CPU at same frequency, right?
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:43 PM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
Glad to hear this one is workin for ya, nothing worse than gettin broken hardware. But make sure you have the latest BIOS installed and to run your mem in sync, you have to run it at 100%. Is that even there?
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:49 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by kakarot
Glad to hear this one is workin for ya, nothing worse than gettin broken hardware. But make sure you have the latest BIOS installed and to run your mem in sync, you have to run it at 100%. Is that even there?
|
Yes, 100% is there. That's sync-mode?
Latest BIOS is installed.
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:52 PM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
Yep, that should do it. When set at 100% it will run at the same speed as the fsb 
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2003, 10:53 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by kakarot
Yep, that should do it. When set at 100% it will run at the same speed as the fsb
|
Cool, thanks!
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 02:13 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Seems the board don't like running the FSB and RAM at the same speed, won't let me boot. 
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:56 AM
|
#13
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
Rep Power: 0
|
 uhoh, I thought they LOVE sync.. . .. what speed are you trying?
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 09:32 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
I have 2x256 Corsair PC3200LL. I tried it at 133.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 10:47 AM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
Damn, that sucks. Is that mem the XMS low latency stuff? I've heard some bad stories about those with the NF2's. What mem timings are you using?
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 11:45 AM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,518
Rep Power: 57
|
Dom what processor do you have again?
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 02:55 PM
|
#17
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by kakarot
Damn, that sucks. Is that mem the XMS low latency stuff? I've heard some bad stories about those with the NF2's. What mem timings are you using?
|
Yea, my memory is low-latency. Not sure of the timings though.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 02:56 PM
|
#18
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Necrosis
Dom what processor do you have again?
|
2200+.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 03:55 PM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
This is weird. So you're saying you can run the fsb at 133 and the mem at 166, and that it don't work in sync at 133? You said it works async right? What settings do you use to have it stable? Mem timings are only configurable if you select 'expert' in the settings. MAybe you'll have to do that to specify some timings to get it stable.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:08 PM
|
#20
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Well, my CPU's FSB is 266, so the I tried running the RAM at 133, but I couldn't boot w/o clearing the CMOS.
The settings I have working now are, CPU interface = aggresive, memory timings = aggresive and memory frequence is at 150% (200Mhz).
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:17 PM
|
#21
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
That's definitely weird. Having it set at 150% though is having the ram run at 150% of the fsb, so there's no way it's at 200MHz right now. It's actually running at 400 the way you have it now(don't know if you were taking ddr). Is 200% the highest it can go?
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:36 PM
|
#22
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,518
Rep Power: 57
|
You definitely may want to back down on the timings since you are trying to run in dual mode. It can be tricky sometimes so everything has to be just right for the charge..discharge of the cells.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:54 PM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by kakarot
That's definitely weird. Having it set at 150% though is having the ram run at 150% of the fsb, so there's no way it's at 200MHz right now. It's actually running at 400 the way you have it now(don't know if you were taking ddr). Is 200% the highest it can go?
|
Yes.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 04:56 PM
|
#24
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Necrosis
You definitely may want to back down on the timings since you are trying to run in dual mode. It can be tricky sometimes so everything has to be just right for the charge..discharge of the cells.
|
When running in sync mode (100%), I don't use the same timings, I used optimal. Optimal forces me to run at 133.
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 08:35 PM
|
#25
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
Rep Power: 0
|
I'm stupid...
 RAM timings were too aggresive, all better now! Thanks, guys! 
|
|
|
Mar 12, 2003, 08:53 PM
|
#26
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
Rep Power: 0
|
Glad to hear you got it workin. You 're not stupid, it's tough until you find the timings your mem likes. If I only had a dime for every time I clear the CMOS 
|
|
|
|
|
|