|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jul 23, 2008, 06:05 PM
|
#1
|
|
kX Project Lead Programmer and Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958
|
Poll!!! kX Router: do we need it? (24-bit stuff for audigy/audigy2)
hi guys,
a small poll:
do you need kX Router?
while it provides enhanced functionality, most recent changes to the driver (24 and 32-bit playback for all 10k2/audigy/audigy2 devices) require it to be completely removed from the system
1. Do you need kX Router?
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
--
current kX version allows to change FX amounts in two ways: by tweaking FXMix2 and by changing 'send amount'
FXMix2 is more flexible, so, no functionality is lost if kX Router is removed
MIDI users: default MIDI routings for Reverb and Chorus will still be available
FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
--
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
E.
Last edited by Eugene Gavrilov; Jul 23, 2008 at 07:01 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 23, 2008, 06:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 414
|
Usually, in my case:
1. No
2. No
3. No
4. Perfectly fine.
5. No
Quote:
|
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
|
Fine with me.
In all the setups I use, I make heavy use of the dsp mixer plugins instead, so it makes no difference to me, however, I think it will be good to still be able to change to which bus a source goes to, just in case... 
Last edited by JGSF; Jul 23, 2008 at 08:32 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 23, 2008, 08:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,104
|
2) I occasionally use kX Router to map different MIDI channels to different FxBusses.
3) Generally, I set the Synth FX Send levels (C and D) to full (and adjust as necessary in the DSP), and set all the other Fx Send levels (C and D for Wave, ASIO, etc) to zero.
4) Not sure, how would that effect panning with MIDI, etc? (i.e. re-assigning Send A but not Send B does not seem to make much sense with MIDI).
5) Occasionally.
1) I guess, but from the above, I pretty much only use kX Router for MIDI related stuff, the rest I really do not need.
Last edited by Russ; Jul 23, 2008 at 08:17 PM.
|
|
|
Jul 23, 2008, 08:17 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 445
|
i never use the kx router...
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008, 12:41 AM
|
#5
|
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 3,724
|
Quote:
do you need kX Router?
while it provides enhanced functionality, most recent changes to the driver (24 and 32-bit playback for all 10k2/audigy/audigy2 devices) require it to be completely removed from the system
|
I use kX Router to re-assign FXBus' for all kX Synth Sends.
Quote:
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
|
I am a little confused - I see ASIO uses Send B now (FXBus 32-47) - If 1 FXBus can transfer 16Bit audio streams (16 ASIO x2 = 32 FXBus lines - correct?) - doesn't that still leave FXBuss 48-63 open for our use? (even for 32 bit ASIO) If yes - please leave them accessible for at least the 2 synths.
I desire to assign All Synth Sends to any of the 16-32 & 48-63 FXBus. Or even better....
If you were to force ASIO to use FXBus 31-63 (remove ASIO assignments from kX router) but keep the Synths assignable with FXBus 0-31.
Quote:
|
FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
|
For anything but Synths is ok - I only re-assign synths sends.
Yeah, removing ASIO Sends C thu H would make kX router more intuitive - the additional sends (C-H) are useless with out kX Automatons (tho, kX automation 'ASIO X Send X Amount' on FXBus would make them *very* useful imho).
I would like to see: (my wish list)
1) Assignable use of FXBus 0-31 for any of the Synths Sends A-H
2) Force ASIO use FXB32-63 for 16/24/32 ASIO. And Remove FXBus2 plugin.
3) Remove assignments for Wave/AC3/D3D - slider 'amount' too .
4) Remove the 'Amount' sliders for Synths Sends C-H, and map MIDI CC91/93 & 16-17 to be direct 'amount' values for Sends C-H respectively for Synths - and just assign FXBus' for the synths and channels.
to me, would greatly simplify things from a users point of view, while keeping much of the flexibility.
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008, 01:32 AM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
hi guys,
1. Do you need kX Router?
|
In practice, no, it can be done with effects too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
|
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
|
Yes, but that can be done by a stdvol effect too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
|
Yes, chaining a stdvol/mx after that works just as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
|
In theory I could have (used to), but I use an mx6 for that now, so no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
current kX version allows to change FX amounts in two ways: by tweaking FXMix2 and by changing 'send amount'
FXMix2 is more flexible, so, no functionality is lost if kX Router is removed
|
I tend to favor MX6 and MX8 (I like peakmeters ;-))
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
MIDI users: default MIDI routings for Reverb and Chorus will still be available
|
Rarely use MIDI for sound anymore, but use automation allot (not related, I know).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
|
This also goes for wave/MIDI/3d positional I assume? I have remapped all the 3d stuff + MIDI + some asio channels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
|
Well, this is cutting it short a bit (by remapping ASIO and 3d, I use more then 32), but if that is the price to pay... then I guess the benefits outweigh the costs of overlapping some stuff by a huge amount. (Yay! 24bit! now if only I could change my dacs... ;-)
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008, 09:03 AM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: germany, sb0090
Posts: 106
|
so far i only needed it for routing midi.
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008, 11:55 AM
|
#8
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
|
i have never used kx router. DSP roulezz
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008, 06:25 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Montevideo, MN USA
Posts: 922
|
Quote:
|
1. Do you need kX Router?
|
I don't think so
Quote:
|
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
|
No
Quote:
|
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
|
No
Quote:
|
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
|
OK by me
Quote:
|
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|