• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Hardware and Related Topics > kX Project Audio Driver Support Forum > General Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Jul 23, 2008, 06:05 PM   #1
kX Project Lead Programmer and Coordinator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,952
Eugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of lightEugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of lightEugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of lightEugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of lightEugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of lightEugene Gavrilov is a glorious beacon of light

Poll!!! kX Router: do we need it? (24-bit stuff for audigy/audigy2)

hi guys,

a small poll:

do you need kX Router?
while it provides enhanced functionality, most recent changes to the driver (24 and 32-bit playback for all 10k2/audigy/audigy2 devices) require it to be completely removed from the system

1. Do you need kX Router?
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
--
current kX version allows to change FX amounts in two ways: by tweaking FXMix2 and by changing 'send amount'
FXMix2 is more flexible, so, no functionality is lost if kX Router is removed

MIDI users: default MIDI routings for Reverb and Chorus will still be available

FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
--
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?

E.

Last edited by Eugene Gavrilov; Jul 23, 2008 at 07:01 PM.
Eugene Gavrilov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2008, 06:41 PM   #2
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 413
JGSF is on a distinguished road

Usually, in my case:

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. Perfectly fine.
5. No

Quote:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
Fine with me.

In all the setups I use, I make heavy use of the dsp mixer plugins instead, so it makes no difference to me, however, I think it will be good to still be able to change to which bus a source goes to, just in case...

Last edited by JGSF; Jul 23, 2008 at 08:32 PM.
JGSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2008, 08:11 PM   #3
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,104
Russ has a spectacular aura aboutRuss has a spectacular aura aboutRuss has a spectacular aura about

2) I occasionally use kX Router to map different MIDI channels to different FxBusses.

3) Generally, I set the Synth FX Send levels (C and D) to full (and adjust as necessary in the DSP), and set all the other Fx Send levels (C and D for Wave, ASIO, etc) to zero.

4) Not sure, how would that effect panning with MIDI, etc? (i.e. re-assigning Send A but not Send B does not seem to make much sense with MIDI).

5) Occasionally.

1) I guess, but from the above, I pretty much only use kX Router for MIDI related stuff, the rest I really do not need.

Last edited by Russ; Jul 23, 2008 at 08:17 PM.
Russ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2008, 08:17 PM   #4
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 444
Chester01 is on a distinguished road

i never use the kx router...
Chester01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 12:41 AM   #5
Tail Razer
 
Maddogg6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 3,721
Maddogg6 will become famous soon enough

Quote:
do you need kX Router?
while it provides enhanced functionality, most recent changes to the driver (24 and 32-bit playback for all 10k2/audigy/audigy2 devices) require it to be completely removed from the system
I use kX Router to re-assign FXBus' for all kX Synth Sends.
Quote:
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
I am a little confused - I see ASIO uses Send B now (FXBus 32-47) - If 1 FXBus can transfer 16Bit audio streams (16 ASIO x2 = 32 FXBus lines - correct?) - doesn't that still leave FXBuss 48-63 open for our use? (even for 32 bit ASIO) If yes - please leave them accessible for at least the 2 synths.

I desire to assign All Synth Sends to any of the 16-32 & 48-63 FXBus. Or even better....

If you were to force ASIO to use FXBus 31-63 (remove ASIO assignments from kX router) but keep the Synths assignable with FXBus 0-31.

Quote:
FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
For anything but Synths is ok - I only re-assign synths sends.
Yeah, removing ASIO Sends C thu H would make kX router more intuitive - the additional sends (C-H) are useless with out kX Automatons (tho, kX automation 'ASIO X Send X Amount' on FXBus would make them *very* useful imho).


I would like to see: (my wish list)
1) Assignable use of FXBus 0-31 for any of the Synths Sends A-H
2) Force ASIO use FXB32-63 for 16/24/32 ASIO. And Remove FXBus2 plugin.
3) Remove assignments for Wave/AC3/D3D - slider 'amount' too .
4) Remove the 'Amount' sliders for Synths Sends C-H, and map MIDI CC91/93 & 16-17 to be direct 'amount' values for Sends C-H respectively for Synths - and just assign FXBus' for the synths and channels.

to me, would greatly simplify things from a users point of view, while keeping much of the flexibility.
Maddogg6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 01:32 AM   #6
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 210
Mata Hari is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
hi guys,
1. Do you need kX Router?
In practice, no, it can be done with effects too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
Yes, but that can be done by a stdvol effect too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
Yes, chaining a stdvol/mx after that works just as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
In theory I could have (used to), but I use an mx6 for that now, so no.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
current kX version allows to change FX amounts in two ways: by tweaking FXMix2 and by changing 'send amount'
FXMix2 is more flexible, so, no functionality is lost if kX Router is removed
I tend to favor MX6 and MX8 (I like peakmeters ;-))

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
MIDI users: default MIDI routings for Reverb and Chorus will still be available
Rarely use MIDI for sound anymore, but use automation allot (not related, I know).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
FXBuses will be kept selectable, however, at the moment you assign, say, 'ASIO 0' to send 0, f, c, d. In the next version, you will only be able to change '0' ('send a').
This also goes for wave/MIDI/3d positional I assume? I have remapped all the 3d stuff + MIDI + some asio channels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene Gavrilov View Post
10k2 users:
Also, is it OK to limit number of FXBuses to 32 (instead of 64: fxbus + fxbus2) - since higher values are used by 24-bit audio transfers internally and should not be used?
Well, this is cutting it short a bit (by remapping ASIO and 3d, I use more then 32), but if that is the price to pay... then I guess the benefits outweigh the costs of overlapping some stuff by a huge amount. (Yay! 24bit! now if only I could change my dacs... ;-)
Mata Hari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 09:03 AM   #7
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: germany, sb0090
Posts: 106
stylus02 is on a distinguished road

so far i only needed it for routing midi.
stylus02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 11:55 AM   #8
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
babinosman is on a distinguished road
System Specs

i have never used kx router. DSP roulezz
babinosman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 06:25 PM   #9
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Doug W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Montevideo, MN USA
Posts: 922
Doug W is on a distinguished road

Quote:
1. Do you need kX Router?
I don't think so

Quote:
2. Do you re-assign default buses?
No
Quote:
3. Do you change amounts in kX Router?
No

Quote:
4. Is it OK to allow only -one- bus for each source to be assignable? (instead of 4..8 - send a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
OK by me

Quote:
5. Do you use kX Router for modifying effect sends?
No
Doug W is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Poll!!! kX Router: do we need it? (24-bit stuff for audigy/audigy2)
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Install Audigy4 drivers on your SB Live!/Audigy/Audigy 2/Audigy2 ZS classic_leon Audio General and Technical Discussion 330 Aug 3, 2005 10:51 AM
whats the difference between Audigy2 ZS and Audigy 2 Value? Geminiwave Audio General and Technical Discussion 5 Dec 15, 2004 12:52 PM
Updated (19 Nov 03) Audigy/Audigy2 drivers.... Brian48 Audio General and Technical Discussion 3 Nov 26, 2003 08:14 PM
Live! vs Audigy vs Audigy2 markanini General Discussion 6 Jul 15, 2003 04:05 PM
Audigy2--->Audigy How to??!? lasrer Audio General and Technical Discussion 3 Feb 4, 2003 02:25 PM




 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net