|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jun 28, 2006, 06:31 PM
|
#1
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
Oldie But Goodie
Hello All!
I'm new to these here parts, but I am wondering if any of you experienced types might give me a hand. There seem to be some many version of the SB line I'm not sure if there is a big difference? I need a good low-latency card, doesn't need to be the latest one. Only doing stereo, 16 and 24 bit with Kontakt.
Any suggestions- oh I gotta but 4 of these so I am trying to find a goodie but cheappie maybe ebay or something.
Thanks in advance-
Tom
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2006, 08:18 PM
|
#2
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,637
|
any of the cards listed under "supported" on this page should do the job
in/out will be 16/48, however any sampling done on the computer will stay at the original quality
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2006, 08:50 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
Ok so none have better latency than others? What do you mean by 16/48 in?
Sorry for all the details-
TS
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2006, 02:02 AM
|
#4
|
|
DH's Latest Mac Convert
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Basement of the first floor
Posts: 15,637
|
16 bit 48khz in and out (you can play samples at 24 bit, but they'll be heard in 16 bit
and no card has better latency than another, all the relevant hardware is pretty much the same (same DSP processor)
|
|
|
Jul 2, 2006, 10:18 AM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
Thanks much, man for clearly that up for me.
Tom
|
|
|
Jul 2, 2006, 01:55 PM
|
#6
|
|
VETUS INFLATIO
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Red Lodge UK
Posts: 15,742
|
shit I didnt know that...LOL
thanx DJ
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2006, 05:06 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brno, Czech Republic
Posts: 5
|
hmmm... a2/a4 cards with p16v+I2S onboard should make it possible to record and playback in 24/96 mode, shouldn't they?
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2006, 05:50 PM
|
#8
|
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 3,723
|
Not ASIO tho - so greater latency - but yes - WDM does work with 3528J with A2ZS.
edit: for clarity... 24/96 works in wdm for record and playback
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2006, 06:08 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brno, Czech Republic
Posts: 5
|
thanks for the answer
btw, a2zs/a4 cards with original creative drivers DO support 24/96 record and playback through ASIO, correct?
|
|
|
Jul 3, 2006, 06:42 PM
|
#10
|
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 3,723
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeaDruiD
thanks for the answer
btw, a2zs/a4 cards with original creative drivers DO support 24/96 record and playback through ASIO, correct?
|
I seen at least one version that DID work for 24/96 ASIO - yes.
edit - but on that machine - it contantly 'dropped out' in sonar - but it also did this in 16/48 as well... so.... IMHO it'll will be hit or miss...
Id be interested in hearing your feedback on it if you decide to give em a try.
|
|
|
|
|
|