|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,256
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
The next time an interview is done, how about showing the persons name when asking the question instead of "DriverHeaven".
While I appreciate it's a DH interview, giving credit to the people that asked the questions isn't too much to ask .... is it?
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
enchanted
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Driverheaven
Posts: 32,287
Rep Power: 3150 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have done this before but the process for interviewing has changed, why? well these interviews or parts of them get linked on other sites and the reason for using "driverheaven" is to ensure people reading it on other sites know the source with every question. If they see "bob" or "eric" asking the question then the source is less visible.
Driverheaven in this instance as its a public interview, means the site and its community, I doubt anyone will be offended because their particular name is not tied to a question - we all know the sources from the original thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
cheap philanthropist
|
It also makes it look better as an article as compared to a chat log, wich it typically isn't anyway. The questions are often also refined by DH staff before put before the interviewed. It would be different if there ever was a realtime IRC chat with some representatives, but after having partaken in some of those a while back I'm not sure that such are something to aim for either.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|