|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jul 23, 2003, 02:06 PM
|
#1
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Level 2 cache?
I just noticed something that worries me...
In DH Full system info, my level 2 cache speed is listed as 540 mhz. My cpu is running at 1621. (I think it's really 1622)- But should my level 2 cache be that speed???? It s a Palamino 1800xp OC'ed a little. 1.84 volts, 43 degrees. Thanks.
Description: x86 Family 6 Model 6 Stepping 2
Processor ID: 0383FBFF00000662
Processor Type: 3
Status: OK
Manufacturer: AuthenticAMD
Availability: Running/Full Power
Load Percentage: 0%
Current Clock Speed: 1621 MHz
Maximum Clock Speed: 1621 MHz
Level 2 Cache Size: 256
Level 2 Cache Speed: 540 MHz
Power Management Supported: False
Revision: 1538
Socket Designation: Socket A
Status Information: 3
Stepping: 2
Version: Model 6, Stepping 2
Voltage Caps:
|
|
|
Sep 3, 2003, 02:27 AM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Senile Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Penthouse Basement
Posts: 619
|
L1 is usually full speed and L2 is usually half the speed of the processor atleast last time I payed attention to that kind of thing, which was backwith my P2 333mhz CPU but they might have lowered it to 1/3 the speed of the CPU or something like that
|
|
|
Sep 3, 2003, 03:02 AM
|
#3
|
|
Driver Cleaner Maker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,899
|
I will look into it and see if i can find out how that is by AMD cpu's.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2003, 08:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1
|
AMD Athlon XP CPUs run there L2 Cache at full speed.
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 09:10 PM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ThinkHarder
AMD Athlon XP CPUs run there L2 Cache at full speed.
|
if it did they would of made it level one
CPUS...
L1 FASTEST-(super expensive ram/cache/less of it) FULL CPU SPEED OR 2/3
L2 NOT AS FAST- (cheaper ram/cache/more of it) USEALLY 1/2 1/3 CPU SPEED
cpu cacheing is... explained here
http://www.systemlogic.net/articles/00/10/cache/
EDIT: oops well thats how it is on older cpu's
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 30, 2003 at 09:53 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 09:23 PM
|
#6
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
|
*Whips out WCPUID*
CPU speed: 2521.35
L2 cache: 256K
L2 cache speed:2521.35
(just found ome new stable overclocked setings, so I havn't updated my sig yet)
Same on my PIII and my P4.
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 09:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
Originally posted by craig588
*Whips out WCPUID*
CPU speed: 2521.35
L2 cache: 256K
L2 cache speed:2521.35
(just found ome new stable overclocked setings, so I havn't updated my sig yet)
Same on my PIII and my P4.
|
is that a slot pIII or the redesighned pga?
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 10:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
|
Thats on my AXP. No PIII chip could be that high.
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 10:41 PM
|
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Originally posted by craig588
Thats on my AXP. No PIII chip could be that high.
|
there are p3 chips with 256k of l2 cache...
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 10:44 PM
|
#10
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
|
I'm talking about speed....Lets see a PIII (Even a Tuly) hit even 2GHz.
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2003, 11:16 PM
|
#11
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
|
Quote:
Originally posted by craig588
Thats on my AXP. No PIII chip could be that high.
|
your confused....
the pIII your sig 933mhz.. slot or pga
and
celerons are acually redeighned PIII's now are they not?.....what you think thier based on pII's nope... they used to be untill the redesighn to the use of the p3 core when ever intel redid the like 1.5 / 2 ghz celerons .. they used the pIII CORE.... i have been told thats why the celeron even beats/or meats the p4 in a few benchmarks. ...
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2003, 12:24 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elysium
Posts: 328
|
So if the L2 runs a full clock speed, whats the difference between L1 and L2?
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2003, 12:53 PM
|
#13
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by craig588
I'm talking about speed....Lets see a PIII (Even a Tuly) hit even 2GHz.
|
Simply impossible. Highest OC-ing which I saw was around 1.6GHz on air. I doubt it can go much higher, even watercooled (because multiplier is locked).
|
|
|
Oct 3, 2003, 05:36 PM
|
#14
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
I'll have to retest now that I have a new MoBo- Maybe DH System info misread my speed because I had an old MoBo before.
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2003, 02:41 AM
|
#15
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BWX232
I'll have to retest now that I have a new MoBo- Maybe DH System info misread my speed because I had an old MoBo before.
|
Post here when you do 
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2003, 02:56 AM
|
#16
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
Aida32 say's about cpu level2 cache: 256kb(on die full speed) (palamino)
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2003, 03:41 AM
|
#17
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,663
|
.....full speedo here...
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2003, 03:51 AM
|
#18
|
|
Freedom is a feature.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Croatia, Rijeka
Posts: 4,404
|
WCPUID and CPU-Z say full speed too...
|
|
|
Oct 4, 2003, 03:53 AM
|
#19
|
|
DH's Dormant Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Location: IN Rem-Dormancy
Posts: 23,663
|
..... actually, i haven't checked since i overclocked..but there shouldn't be a change..... I can say that it's weird seeing a bigger jump in preformance going from 2800+ to 3000+ compared to 2500+ - 2800+
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2003, 11:07 PM
|
#20
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
CPU Properties
CPU Type AMD Athlon XP, 1680 MHz (5.75 x 292) 2000+
CPU Alias Palomino
CPU Stepping A5
L1 Code Cache 64 KB
L1 Data Cache 64 KB
L2 Cache 256 KB (On-Die, Full-Speed)
This is from AIDA on my 1800+ Palamino:
DH system info must have been reading it wrong.
CPU Physical Info
Package Type 453 Pin PGA
Package Size 4.95 cm x 4.95 cm
Transistors 37.5 million
Process Technology 6Mi, 0.18 um, CMOS, Cu
Die Size 128 mm2
Core Voltage 1.75 V
I/O Voltage 1.6 V
Typical Power 41.3 - 64.3 W (depending on clock speed)
Maximum Power 46.1 - 72 W (depending on clock speed)
CPU Manufacturer
Company Name Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Product Information http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...30_118,00.html
CPU Utilization
CPU #1 0 %
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2003, 11:26 PM
|
#21
|
|
Never forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rest In peace, Joe.
Posts: 2,202
|
5.75x 292??????? Say what??
How about something like 11.5x 145!!!
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2003, 11:39 PM
|
#22
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Roadee
5.75x 292??????? Say what??
How about something like 11.5x 145!!!
|
Yeah, I saw that- Kinda weird.
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2003, 11:45 PM
|
#23
|
|
Never forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rest In peace, Joe.
Posts: 2,202
|
You have something wrong....something is corrupt or bad maybe. 3DM 01 is reading your info correctly, but nothing else seems to be. You have an 1800, 9700 Pro, and the NFS-7 MB. What cooling and memory are you using? Also what BIOS version are you using, and when was the last time you flashed/updated it?
|
|
|
Oct 6, 2003, 11:59 PM
|
#24
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Roadee
You have something wrong....something is corrupt or bad maybe. 3DM 01 is reading your info correctly, but nothing else seems to be. You have an 1800, 9700 Pro, and the NFS-7 MB. What cooling and memory are you using? Also what BIOS version are you using, and when was the last time you flashed/updated it?
|
I have the latest bios- they installed it at ExcaliberPC before I bought it and tested the board. I do seem to have some weird problems, like on the boot screen it doesn't report the correct FSB speed,- it will say the mem is running at 290 even if it is running at 292 or 294mhz--
but when I set it a certain FSB that do not get reported correctly- it still is actually going at that speed. I dunno- I figured it was because I'm using a Palamino after they tested the MB for a 400mhz fsb Barton. I cleared the Cmos though- so that should have no affect now-
I am using a messed up ram config though- I blame it on that-
I got 512mb PNY pc2700 in slot one and 256mb Crucial pc2100 in slot 3- BUT, it works, and it gives me a faster rig, so I'm not going back to single controller config- but I am planning on getting some faster matched sticks soon.
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2003, 12:00 AM
|
#25
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Roadee
Yo You have an 1800,
|
Oh, but I am OC'ing, so it's running at this speed....
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2003, 12:21 AM
|
#26
|
|
Never forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rest In peace, Joe.
Posts: 2,202
|
The memory is most likely the problem. Since you are running 2700 and 2100 memory......your memory is limited by the lesser stick....the 2100. With your set up......if you were to run a single stick of 512 PC3200 or PC3500 memory and a Barton 2500+......your system would ROCK!!! You would gain 4000+ pts on 3DMark 2001 at least. Just running the faster memory would give you a nice boost. The NF2 board is very picky when it comes to memory. I would suspect that is the corruption problem.
You should run Sandra memory benchmark with both sticks in....then just the 2700 in......to see what the scores are when compared. Having mixed sticks is most likely playing havoc with your mother boards memory timings.
|
|
|
Oct 7, 2003, 01:49 AM
|
#27
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
| |