|
| Notices |
DriverHeaven is currently recruiting for the AWOMO Beta Test / Elite Op Team. AWOMO is a digital download service for games, and we're looking to expand the beta team. If you're interested. Sign up as a member here at DriverHeaven and then head HERE to submit your details. Thanks
For more info on AWOMO visit their site HERE
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Jul 13, 2008, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
|
DH Administrator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 4,678
|
DH Preview: ATI R700 Preview
Read The Preview Here
____________________
For the past year and a half ATI have had a tough time competing with Nvidia at the high end of the graphics card market. Products such as the 2900 and 3800 series struggled to perform at levels comparable to the GeForce 8800, 9800 and GTX 280 however ATI did eventually work out a good pricing structure which made them attractive to consumers.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 06:48 PM
|
#2
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
|
Did ATI/AMD Choose which games you can show benchmarks for?
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 07:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,523
Rep Power: 58

|
I wonder how the upcoming die shrink for Nvidia could effect their release of a X2 of their own? Wonder what the price will be the R700 $450.00?
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 07:23 PM
|
#4
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cloaked
Posts: 2,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3DChipset
Did ATI/AMD Choose which games you can show benchmarks for?
|
We chose the games after testing our entire suite.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 07:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
DH's oldest Geek?
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,539
|
Damn...my 3870 X2 just wet itself, and is now over in the corner whimpering like a little girl
Sure would have liked to see a 'nekkid' side by side photo of the two X2s. It sure would be nice if the Koolance water block on my 3870 X2 would fit the 4870 X2. Probably not...but one can hope.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 07:30 PM
|
#6
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gefle, Sweden
Posts: 3,221
|
Good news on the idle/2D voltage being lowered for the final product. Have you seen any information from AMD/ATI regarding possible changes to idle/2D voltages for the existing 4850/4870 product line? Those are using up a bit much juice when idle.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 07:35 PM
|
#7
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cloaked
Posts: 2,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk
Good news on the idle/2D voltage being lowered for the final product. Have you seen any information from AMD/ATI regarding possible changes to idle/2D voltages for the existing 4850/4870 product line? Those are using up a bit much juice when idle.
|
No to go too off topic but i have seen 4 different bios versions kicking about for the 4870 and the more recent ones all had updated voltages.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 10:40 PM
|
#8
|
|
At Your Service...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,725
|
For those games that have the driver support I have just two words:
Holy Cow!
In between about the last year or year and a half, and with the growing maturity of the x2 architecture, we're seeing close to a tripling (!!!) of performance available at the highest end - and for, um, the same (or less) money? Way to go ATI - woot!
I think the purchase of a monitor with native res at 1920x1200 is now fully justifiable (meaning video smooth gaming at that res, with all of the recent games - except, well, you know...) for even value minded enthusiasts (yes, like me!).
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 11:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
In Fedor We Trust
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,974
|
Jumping Jesus Jehosaphat!
The 4850 was a good start but not quite enough and the 4870 was impressive but still only a hair better than Nvidia. Then the R700 comes along and annihilates everything else! I couldn't believe those World in Conflict benches that is some incredible power...just look at what it does to a 9800GTX+.
I was skeptical about AMD regaining the performance crown but this card settles it for me. If it's this good now it'll surely be even better with mature drivers.
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 11:39 PM
|
#10
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
|
Extremely impressed with those results.
But what's up with Crysis? How is it completely pounding the GTX280 in every benchmark and gets embarrassed in Crysis?
Just game/driver support?
|
|
|
Jul 13, 2008, 11:44 PM
|
#11
|
|
In Fedor We Trust
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa , Canada
Posts: 3,974
|
HardOCP has some great high res pics up from CoD4 and Oblivion too, apparently this card can use a custom AA which doesn't tax the bandwidth. Oblivion with 24xAA and Qarl's Texture pack
Please do some Medieval 2: Total War (or Kingdoms) benches in the full review! This card just might have enough memory to handle 10,000+ units on screen.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 12:42 AM
|
#12
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Uk
Posts: 8,333
Rep Power: 0
|
Sweet card, this is the card i will be ditching my 8800GTX for on my Formula Rampage x48 Board 
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 02:28 AM
|
#13
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
|
why the hell u make tests crysis...and with crappy 1280x1024 res?
all other games 2560*1600 and crysis 1280...
this isnt game(i call it benchmark) to play/test with newest gfx with such as low resolutions, try 1680*1050 at minimum please
and this card is beast, sadly i dont have enough power in my wallet/rig to put it in
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 02:29 AM
|
#14
|
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BOTSWANA
Posts: 330
|
Holy S***t  this card is totaly hard core makes me want to wait and not get the HD4870 just yet ! 
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 02:54 AM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregix
why the hell u make tests crysis...and with crappy 1280x1024 res? all other games 2560*1600 and crysis 1280...
|
Dude where have you been for the last year? what is the point of DH testing Crysis at 2560x1600 when it will probably run at about 10fps? Crysis is a system killer (crap game too).
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:26 AM
|
#16
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 472
|
I am still not sold to be honest. Sure, the performance is great, but its a rather inelegant power consuming monster. I am positive the power draw will be lower when it hits retail however doesn't anyone else feel this is just a method to compete with another company who are producing faster hardware? I mean the end user is still going to be tied into crossfire drivers. This is a huge negative, because while the games on test all have crossfire drivers, they are firmly established on the market .... what happens when new games are released? Many people are going to running them in single card mode until ATI release updated driver support which can be frequently several months.
I am sorry, I just don't see how slapping an "extra card" onto a product is in anyway competitive or worthwhile to the end user especially as the performance will be basically halved when new games hit the scene (I know I waited for months for driver support on games I had just beaten!).
What if Nvidia release two 280's on a single card? It all just seems to me to be so sloppy and lazy. My view is either get a single card design out, or a "dual" core card that always uses both cores.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:38 AM
|
#17
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cloaked
Posts: 2,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregix
why the hell u make tests crysis...and with crappy 1280x1024 res?
all other games 2560*1600 and crysis 1280...
this isnt game(i call it benchmark) to play/test with newest gfx with such as low resolutions, try 1680*1050 at minimum please
and this card is beast, sadly i dont have enough power in my wallet/rig to put it in
|
Quite simply that would be pointless as the card just manages 12x7 (minimum FPS of 26).
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:56 AM
|
#18
|
|
Driverheaven Lover
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 21
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veridian3
Quite simply that would be pointless as the card just manages 12x7 (minimum FPS of 26).
|
Funny you mention that, I noticed Hardocp tested crysis at 1920 or something, but the frame rates are frequently hitting single digit! like 5-6fps. That is absolutely unplayable and pointless. So much for real world testing there! apples for apples my arse.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 04:06 AM
|
#19
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 0
|
lol, who uses Hardocp for accurate hardware reviews anymore anyway? Kyle is so far up his own ass and slagging other sites off in their threads that he doesnt realise that gamers dont actually play crysis at 10fps! Yes I read that page as well and they tested at a high res with unplayable frame rates.
Didnt they also test with "high" settings? which disables all the DX10 goodies? they are best just running the DX9 configuration mod to play it in full DX9 if they are going to do that.
Apples to Apples? more like Pears to Grapefruit.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:05 PM
|
#20
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 472
|
While we are on the subject of Hardocp I noticed that they mentioned some new mode called "custom filtering AA"? why didnt you guys mention it in this review? surely thats a breakthrough?
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:33 PM
|
#21
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cloaked
Posts: 2,853
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brutusmaximus
While we are on the subject of Hardocp I noticed that they mentioned some new mode called "custom filtering AA"? why didnt you guys mention it in this review? surely thats a breakthrough?
|
When I saw your comment I was a bit surprised so I've gone over and had a quick read at their article. It seems they have called that one wrong.
Custom Filtering AA has been present in the ATI drivers since the R600 (2900), in fact we covered it on this page: http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/...ewz/whatis.php about half way down.
About 3-4 months after that launch a 3rd mode was added (edge-detect) and since then all 2000, 3000 and 4000 products have been able to use this feature. Although, like any other demanding setting, you need faster cards to take advantage of the higher settings.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 03:40 PM
|
#22
|
|
Driverheaven Lover
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 21
|
Thanks Veridian3, your article was the best on the net by the way. You certainly know what you are talking about which is refreshing from the regurgitated crap I read on other sites.
|
|
|
Jul 14, 2008, 05:22 PM
|
#23
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
 | |