|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Sep 29, 2004, 01:52 PM
|
#31
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,116
|
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 01:54 PM
|
#32
|
|
DH News MOD
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 32,706
|
it works now..
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 01:54 PM
|
#33
|
|
Colour Commentator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 5,619
|
Kewl! I got 4547 4xAA 4xAF w/X800 500/540! 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 01:56 PM
|
#34
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wu Han, Hu Bei, P.R.China
Posts: 1,236
|
There are friends of mine tested, some modded drivers(which can be cheated drivers) of ATI are not able to cheat 3DMark05 to get "extra" makes by comparing Graphic card with Catalyst drivers!
Ati X800XT PE got 4162 with C4.9 driver. And it got 4175 with cheated drivers!
Last edited by classic_leon; Sep 29, 2004 at 02:43 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:00 PM
|
#35
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,664
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by classic_leon
There are friends of mine tested, cheated-drivers of ATI are not able to cheat 3DMark05!
On ATi X800XT PE, by using Catalyset 4.9 drivers, 3DMARK05 markes 4162; if use cheated-drivers,ATi X800XT PE markes 4175。
|
I can honestly say ive no idea what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:04 PM
|
#37
|
|
.:z0diac Knight:.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .:this is definitely not my timeline:.
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zardon
I can honestly say ive no idea what you are talking about.
|

|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:06 PM
|
#38
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
2352 for me
i spose as soon as this kinda graphics goes mainstream, a new video card will top my shopping list
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:10 PM
|
#39
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pr0digal jenius
2352 for me
i spose as soon as this kinda graphics goes mainstream, a new video card will top my shopping list
|
Buy me one while you're at it.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:14 PM
|
#40
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wu Han, Hu Bei, P.R.China
Posts: 1,236
|
New record: 7000
Graphic card: 6800U SLI core 651MHz/memory 639MHz(1024*768; disable AA/AF)
rig:
Asus SK8V
AMD Athlon 64
1G ram
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:22 PM
|
#41
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
|
hi guys, downloading it right now! im excited! i really dont have idea of how much score will i get! i have 9800pro(stock). any idea guys??
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:34 PM
|
#43
|
|
Burned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,664
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by classic_leon
New record: 7000
Graphic card: 6800U SLI core 651MHz/memory 639MHz(1024*768; disable AA/AF)
rig:
Asus SK8V
AMD Athlon 64
1G ram
|
Thats not the record, look higher 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:44 PM
|
#44
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,426
|
the highest score yet is 7726 w/ a x800xtpe
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:47 PM
|
#45
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Floatin'...
Posts: 4,958
|
my 9800 pro @ XT Speeds got 2714 3d marks and my athlon xp 2700+ got 3586... 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:49 PM
|
#46
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
|
@ deekey777
why you didn't OC your proc? maybe it could help.. your using barton 2500+?
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:49 PM
|
#47
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,426
|
my athlon 2800+ got something like 1680 marks, i think it was overheating or something. i got artifacts on the loading screen before the test, but not during the test.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 02:51 PM
|
#48
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wu Han, Hu Bei, P.R.China
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zardon
Thats not the record, look higher 
|
Yeah, you are right.
Just now I copied the information from a Malaysian website, and just pasted to post with my lazy translation. 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:08 PM
|
#49
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Darlington,UK
Posts: 11
|
First run with everything in sig at stock speeds 5422, not too shabby!
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:19 PM
|
#50
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 43
|
2500+ @ 2.3 (11.5*200)
BFG 6800GT OC at stock ( I dont really want to overclock my video card after i fried my 9700 Pro i jsut dont like doing it anymore.)
Useing the 66.70 beta drivers i got 4805
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=9044
I am going to run it with my cpu at 2.5 hoping to get close to 5k or over it.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:33 PM
|
#51
|
|
Colour Commentator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 5,619
|
Wheee!
With 4xAA 4xAF I'm getting 4547 and the demos are incredible in the full version!
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:39 PM
|
#52
|
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,676
|
people are getting scores on 05 that i can't get on 03 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:40 PM
|
#53
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 3,528
|
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:41 PM
|
#54
|
|
9500pro Forever
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 276
|
With my 9500pro at stock and XP2600+ @ stock, with omegas 4.9s i got 1702, not bad i dont think. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=8809
Now onto overclocking 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 03:44 PM
|
#55
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,942
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dipstick
|
Yeah, that is pretty low for your system.
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 04:05 PM
|
#56
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lorca (Spain)
Posts: 627
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by davidnsibs
|
I hope to beat that with my system as soon as my download finishes 
|
|
|
Sep 29, 2004, 04:12 PM
|
#57
|
|
9500pro Forever
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 276
|
Just ran another, can only have one online though, but my new score with my FSB @ 175 (350DDR - 2009mhz barton) and 9500pro @364/324 was 2118. I'm sure I can get this higher as I've got a virus scanner, nvmixer etc running in the background and I'll get higher overclocks. Just wondering, do you guys all leave mipmap detail and texture at high quality when benching (I always do cos that is what I have them on while gaming)? Does setting them to performance make much difference?
|
 | |