|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
Aug 26, 2003, 03:16 AM
|
#1
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
1280x1024 and max quality: 3DMark2001
OK, 1600x1200 was too high for some people, so let's have it at 1280x1024x32 . . . .
For 9700/9800-level cards, running 3DMark2001 at 1280x1024,
and D3D control panel set to 6xAA, 16xqAF, texture & detail sliders at max:
Post links/results for a full run (17 tests), if you can.
This ain't a contest, I just wanna see some results from diff setups, so please be honest.
And if it's not too much trouble, please start with your: - Video card, and core/mem speeds
- CPU, bus speed & multiplier
- RAM amount, type, speed, and timings
- Motherboard, and chipset it uses
- OS, what SP is installed, and Catalyst/Omega driver version
Thanks and happy benching
Last edited by Vampyromaniac; Aug 26, 2003 at 12:36 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 03:47 AM
|
#2
|
|
Seen my brain?
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: WA,USA
Posts: 760
|
Ooooh!! One I can partake in!
3DMark2001 ORB: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6923763
Specs are as below.
Last edited by Sharkims; Aug 26, 2003 at 04:22 AM.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 05:13 AM
|
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 169
|
sharkims, with your system specs.... should be one of the highest.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 05:15 AM
|
#4
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 169
|
oh yeah, you did with truform enabled...
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 05:49 AM
|
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 169
|
Hi Hi...
This is mine.
I have set 3DMARK2001 to enable AntiAliasing... 6X
And the control panel settings too.
And this is what I got. 59XX for system.

|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 09:58 AM
|
#6
|
|
Seen my brain?
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: WA,USA
Posts: 760
|
TruForm is just set to application prefference, 3dmark didn't have it turned on.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 11:50 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 12:50 PM
|
#9
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
cool, replies already
Heh, I was running these last night, but sleep called before I could post
all stock speeds... - AIW 9700 Pro @ stock speed (324/310.5)
- AthlonXP 1800 @ 1533 MHz (133 x 11.5)
- 256 MB pc2100 @ 133 MHz (cas2-3-4-6)
- ECS K7S5A (SiS 735 chipset)
- Windows 2000 (sp2), Catalyst 3.5
Result: 5733
vid card oc'ed... - AIW 9700 Pro @ 371/344
- everything else the same
Result: 6256
Nice numbers from the rest of you guys 
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 12:58 PM
|
#10
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cartman
my humble result....
|
Lol, cartman . . . I just noticed you left AA turned off, and Texture and Mipmap Detail at minimum! 
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 01:13 PM
|
#11
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cartman
my humble result....
|
Yeah, crank them settings up! (I'll be able to post tomorrow- or later today)
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 10:09 PM
|
#12
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
He has AA on in 3dmark, obviously, cuz of his score. BUt yeah, crank up the quality.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 10:20 PM
|
#13
|
|
Avril Fan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in colombia, okok, bogotá city :p
Posts: 1,252
|
mmm, someone did listen to me, thats new  Ill post my points later
Last edited by Shadow Lady; Aug 26, 2003 at 11:18 PM.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 10:22 PM
|
#14
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DriveEuro
He has AA on in 3dmark, obviously, cuz of his score.
|
If you click his compare link, you'll see:
FSAA         Disabled
Quote:
Originally posted by Shadow Lady
mmm, some did listen to me, thats new Ill post my points later
|
of course I listened to you  wise words
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 10:45 PM
|
#15
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
I have 3DMark2001 V330 installed. It won't run with DirectX9.0b installed on my system. I do recall modifying my registry to make it 'think' I had DirectX8 installed. But, why hasn't FutureMark posted a patch for DX9 yet? (Or have they? I can't find it.)
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2003, 11:28 PM
|
#16
|
|
Avril Fan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in colombia, okok, bogotá city :p
Posts: 1,252
|
ATI Radeon 9500pro (351/297mhz)
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ Stock speed (1530mhz 133*11.5)
384mb SDRam PC133 cas2-3-3-6
PCChips m810mlr (Sis730s)
Windows XP SP1 Omega 3.5 drivers
Ok, this are my points:
1280*1024x32 6xFSAA 16xAF Max Detail = 4940 marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6926791
1024*768x32 6xFSAA 16xAF Max Detail = 6120 marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6926794
mmm, I think its expected or somethen, but I noticed the Advanced Pixel Shaders test on 1280*1024 to disable FSAA, I wonder why only on this test, ohh well
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 12:12 AM
|
#17
|
|
Demonic
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the cold, dark north...
Posts: 5,098
|
Last edited by Cartman; Aug 27, 2003 at 12:47 AM.
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 12:17 AM
|
#18
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
did you close 3DMark while you were changing settings, then open 3DMark after saving the settings?
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 12:45 AM
|
#19
|
|
Demonic
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the cold, dark north...
Posts: 5,098
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Vampyromaniac
did you close 3DMark while you were changing settings, then open 3DMark after saving the settings?
|
Hehe...i propably didn't because i re-ran the test now...and got the blazing score 8129...still a bit weird that i got a higher score after dragging those quality sliders to the max...oh well..

|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 12:46 AM
|
#20
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
|
YOu need to change setting in radlinker or the ati control panel, THEN run 3dmark.
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 12:48 AM
|
#21
|
|
Demonic
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the cold, dark north...
Posts: 5,098
|
Yepp....i just did.. 
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 01:01 AM
|
#22
|
|
DriverHeaven Granddaddy
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 12,115
|
OK, here's mine. Finally found the correct 330 patch for 3DMark2001.

|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 02:20 AM
|
#23
|
|
confutatis maledictis
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somewhere dark
Posts: 5,952
|
Heh, that ain't 6xAA & 16xAF though is it? 
Glad you got it running though! 
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 04:47 AM
|
#24
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6927307
768MB PC2700ram @280mhz - 2.5,3,3,7- Dumb PNY ram won't run at anything tighter- it's going to be RMA'd-
Win XP pro
Amd xp1800 @ 1610
retail 9700p @342/320
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 05:23 AM
|
#25
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
System:
MoBo = Shuttle AK32a Via drivers: 449
PSU = Q-tec 550 watt
mem = 2x 256mb_cl2.5 Hyund. DDR266mhz
Cpu = Amd Athlon 1600xp+
HD = WD- 800JB 80Gb - Seagate Barracuda ATA-IV 80Gb
Vid = Ati9700 driver: 2.4.74a (Omega)
OS = W2000 sp4 DX9b
Sound = Hercules FortissimoIII 7.1
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2003, 05:40 AM
|
#26
|
|
watching 1080i
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: April 13th 2029
Posts: 19,432
|
Hawk I bet you could OC and get at least my score.
|
|
|
|