|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Sapphire 9800 Pro 128 M vs Asus FX 5900 Ultra 256 M (3d mark results)
i had a chance to test both of these cards
![]() Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128 M Price: 499 $ CAN Asus FX 5900 Ultra 256 M Price: 699 $ CAN Pc config: Mobo: Asus P4PE Cpu: 3.06 Ghz Pentium 4 Intel with HTT 533 fsb Memory: 1 G pc2700 ddr 333 Video: Asus 5900 Ultra 256 M/Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128 M Sound: SB Audigy 1 Test config: Both video cards runs at stock speeds, nothing is overclocked, everything is stock! 3d mark 01/03 settings: DEFAULT 1024 x 768 x 32 no AA no AF 3d mark 2003 with latest patch Drivers: Radeon : CAT 3.6 FX 5900 Ultra: 44.03 here are screenshots: [Test 1] Asus FX 5900 Ultra 256 M (3d Mark 2001 SE) [Test 2] Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128 M (3d Mark 2001 SE) [Test 3] Asus FX 5900 Ultra 256 M (3d Mark 2003 with latest patch) [Test 4] Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 128 M (3d Mark 2003 with latest patch)
__________________
kms |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
![]() what a huge difference![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
DH News MOD
|
i would goe for the tti based on those screenshot scores.bit of a difference in the scores.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|