|
| Notices |
Welcome to the DriverHeaven.net forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
Aug 29, 2006, 11:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
The Paranoid Cook
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 626
|
Stupid question about AMD processors VS Intel...
I notice a lot of AMD processors are only like 2.2 or 2.4 or 2.8 GHZ.
Now P4 are like 3.2 3.0 3.0
how is it that AMD outperforms pentium though???
FSB?
|
|
|
Aug 30, 2006, 01:00 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
F.U.B.A.R.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 17,562
|
well, this was true up until Intel launched the Core 2 processors 'bout a week or two ago.
what was going on is that AMD processors were more efficient at making calculations per clock cycle, whereas, for Intel processors to make the same (or greater) amount of power, they had to make more cycles to be just as powerful. Thus making the p4 have the higher clock cycles.
The best way i can explain it, is like this; an AMD processor at 2.2Ghz (AMD 3500) does 10 calculations per clock cycle. An Intel 3.6Ghz processor does 6 calculations per clock cycle. The AMD processor is more efficient because it can do more at a slower speed.
|
|
|
Aug 30, 2006, 07:08 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
The Paranoid Cook
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 626
|
Still got to say the AMD's and Intels out now are still good, unless you have crazy money, which it seems some people do, I mean the systems are still really good. Yeah I got the 4600 and it's coming in the mail today it's the X2 4600 so now I understand what you are saying, where can you find the stats on the how many calculations the AMD does per cycle?
|
|
|
Aug 30, 2006, 10:46 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,533
|
A few things made the A64's faster than the P4 in most situations; the mentioned 11 vs. 6 ipc(instructions per clock), onboard memory controller, and larger and much faster cache are just a few. Intel learned from its mistakes and the new Core 2 cpus are able to best AMD clock for clock.
|
|
|
Sep 8, 2006, 05:32 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19
|
the other thing is the p4 used only 100mhz core while amd uses 200mhz (amd needs a lower multiplyer so its faster)
and the clocks that r advertized arnt the only clocks the advrage p4 uses 3.0ghz and 800mhz fsb while the advrage amd is 2.2 ghz and 2ghz fsb, so 4x the fsb will make a huge inpact
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|