• Home
  • Reviews
  • Articles
  • News
  • Tools
  • GamingHeaven
  • Forums
  • Network
 

Go Back   DriverHeaven.net > Forums > Graphics Cards > ATI Graphic Cards

Notices

Poll: What do you think?
Poll Options
What do you think?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Feb 14, 2004, 05:38 PM   #1
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
pRAyNz is on a distinguished road

Need help from Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB owners

I got a new Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro 256 MB for replacement today, but I`m really irritated, it uses 8 chips of DDR(1) RAM (instead of 16 of DDR2), it`s BIOS is labeled: "R360 Hynix DDR BIOS W THERMAL CONTROL" (instead of "R350 Samsung DDR2"), the RAM is clocked at 337 MHz (instead of 351 MHz) and there are no RAM sinks, but a much more massive GPU-cooler than on my original card.

But the card itself is labeled "Radeon 9800 Pro" on its back, I don`t see an overdrive tab in the display config (like I expected because of the BIOS` title), there`s no dust or something and everything smells like "fresh from the fab" (otherwise I would have thought someone used it/RMA`d it before).

Please, if someone has the 9800Pro256 with DDR1-RAM have a look at it`s BIOS-title (using "Savebios" and "radedit" for example) and if it`s not "...R360 Hynix DDR BIOS W THERMAL CONTROL..." tell me and mail me the BIOS, if possible - which enables me to check if only this string has been changed or if this card could be a crippled Radeon 9800 XT...

Edit
I voted "It`s propably a crippled R9800XT" because I want it to show me the results without more clicking - and I`m still hoping...

Last edited by pRAyNz; Feb 14, 2004 at 05:55 PM.
pRAyNz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2004, 02:46 AM   #2
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 55
RebelWolf is on a distinguished road

Not sure this is going to be real helpful for you, but over on the OCFaq forums, there is a post up from someone who bought a 9800Pro with 256 meg of ram on it, and it's the XT PCB, with a R360 chip.

He claims his has a 9800 Pro bios on the board, but went into no details.

Personally, it makes me wonder if some manufacturers are "downgrading" XT's that either couldn't manage the clock rate, or had some other error like the thermal probe not working correctly, something on the same lines as how the 9800SE's came into existance.

RebelWolf
RebelWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2004, 04:43 AM   #3
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 6
Sire is on a distinguished road

rolleyes Pro

I had a pro but there was no overdrive tab at all that is only with the XT and the 360 chip is the XT chip. I got now the XT from Club. and its a great card
Sire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2004, 06:08 AM   #4
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
pRAyNz is on a distinguished road

@RebelWolf
Quote:
Not sure this is going to be real helpful for you, but over on the OCFaq forums, there is a post up from someone who bought a 9800Pro with 256 meg of ram on it, and it's the XT PCB, with a R360 chip.

He claims his has a 9800 Pro bios on the board, but went into no details.
Thanks a lot, I`ll have a look.
Uhm, BTW do you know if ATITool for example gets the chip version from the video BIOS or directely from the chip? - If its from the hardware my question is answered, because it reads "R350" which means it`s a common R9800Pro 256MB DDR1 with modified BIOS. - In this case something would still be strange...why should anyone flash a modified BIOS without tuning anything (I know of) but the BIOS string (the device ID is the regular one and I guess the clockings are standard for the DDR1 variant)
I think no matter what comes out I have to contact Sapphire to get some more information about this.

Quote:
Personally, it makes me wonder if some manufacturers are "downgrading" XT's that either couldn't manage the clock rate, or had some other error like the thermal probe not working correctly, something on the same lines as how the 9800SE's came into existance.
That was exactely what I was hoping and AFAIK it`s quite common too, to slow down processors if there`s need for low-end or mainstream (GeForce4 4200, Athlon TB 700, Barton 2500... )
Given a good cooling this could mean there`s an enormous overclocking potential compared with other 9800Pros

@Sire
Quote:
I had a pro but there was no overdrive tab at all that is only with the XT and the 360 chip is the XT chip. I got now the XT from Club. and its a great card
Sure, but ATM there`s still a chance that this here is not a R350/9800Pro but a slowed down R360/XT-chip like in the case "RebelWolf" wrote about.
(And maybe even useful parts of the hardware sensor are existing and only waiting for the right BIOS to be flashed...)
pRAyNz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2004, 06:48 AM   #5
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
The_Neon_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,122
The_Neon_Cowboy is on a distinguished road
System Specs

I'd remove the cooler and look at whats on the video chip
The_Neon_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2004, 06:52 AM   #6
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 29
pRAyNz is on a distinguished road

Yep, I`m going to do this. - Am just waiting for the Zalman heatpipe to arrive here.

Edit:
Just had a look at the ->report<- by the user who`s Radeon Pro 256MB is based on a XT-PCB and the picture of his card looks like my current card
From the linked posting:
Quote:
as u can see, it is a real 9800XT bios but with 9800pro frequencies (and certainly a modification to make windows detect a 9800pro and not a XT)
Quote:
i take here the bios from the original ATI 9800XT 256
[...]
i flash my card and ....... it is working like a charm, i restart windows, it detect a new card .... a 9800XT !!!!
now i have overdrive, temperature monitoring and a real 9800xt !!!!
That`s it! - Now everything fits - I`m really happy now!

Edit:

I flashed the ATI XT BIOS on it, installed the Zalman heatpipe and am running benchmarks since some hours. Everything I tried works, no flaws - Overdrive is showing up and reports 56 Idle and 63 load-temperatures

Last edited by pRAyNz; Feb 17, 2004 at 11:24 AM.
pRAyNz is offline   Reply With Quote
 

 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Artwork by Allan 'Zardon' Campbell, vBulletin implementation by Craig '5320' Humphreys based on original artwork by Ratchet.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM. Copyright ©2008 HeavenMedia.net